<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master dc10ca3 Sjors Provoost: net: switch to signet DNS seed
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 68bbfcc W. J. van der Laan: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23021: net: switch to signet DNS seed
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #22579: doc: Add references for the generator/constant used in Bech32(m) (master...202107_bech32_doc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22579
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 16a5997 W. J. van der Laan: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22579: doc: Add references for the generator/constan...
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master b8cd2a4 Pieter Wuille: Add references for the generator/constant used in Bech32(m)
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] meshcollider opened pull request #23106: Ensure wallet is unlocked before signing in walletprocesspsbt (master...202109_walletprocesspsbt_unlocked) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23106
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #22892: doc: Clarify that change_cost cannot be negative in GetSelectionWaste (master...doc-change-cost-not-negative) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22892
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master d2eccac benthecarman: doc: Clarify that change_cost cannot be negative in GetSelectionWaste
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 07e743e W. J. van der Laan: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22892: doc: Clarify that change_cost cannot be negat...
<bitcoin-git>
[gui] meshcollider opened pull request #436: Include vout when copying transaction ID from coin selection (master...202109_coinselection_copy_vout) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/436
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #23102: test: Add missing re.escape() to feature_addrman test (master...2109-testWin) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23102
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa01f22 MarcoFalke: test: Add missing re.escape() to feature_addrman test
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master eabc2c4 W. J. van der Laan: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23102: test: Add missing re.escape() to feature_addr...
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #23104: log: Avoid breaking single log lines over multiple lines in the log file (master...2109-logCont) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23104
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #23103: ci: Enable feature_asmap.py test on native Windows (master...210927-asmap) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23103
<bitcoin-git>
[gui] jarolrod opened pull request #435: Move third-party tx URL setting from Display to Wallet options tab (master...move-3partytx-setting) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/435
<TallTim>
Sorry if not topical - but google searches only referred me to client pages with no detail. Is there a way to direct the Bitcoin Core client to pull its blocks from a full node I control on the same network? Just seems it would be faster.
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] katesalazar opened pull request #23100: Abort tests early upon filling the test logs drive (master...20210926) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23100
<shiza>
I'm taking that as "Bitcoin doesn't support running all of the functional tests suite on temporary directories so small".
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #23065: Allow UTXO locks to be written to wallet DB (master...202109_lockunspent_persistence) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23065
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master c527893 Samuel Dobson: Allow locked UTXOs to be store in the wallet database
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master f13fc16 Samuel Dobson: Allow lockunspent to store the lock in the wallet DB
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 719ae92 Samuel Dobson: Update lockunspent tests for lock persistence
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Shubhankar-Gambhir reopened pull request #23052: test: use miniwallet in test_rpc function in feature_rbf.py (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23052
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Shubhankar-Gambhir closed pull request #23052: test: use miniwallet in test_rpc function in feature_rbf.py (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23052
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] meshcollider opened pull request #23097: Run specified functional tests with all matching flags (master...202109_tests_matchall) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23097
2021-09-25
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] AaronDewes opened pull request #23096: util: Treat empty settings.json file as valid (master...allow-empty-settings-json) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23096
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] meshcollider opened pull request #23093: Add ability to flush keypool and always flush when upgrading non-HD to HD (master...202109_keypoolrefill) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23093
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #23089: ci: Increase the dynamic port range to the maximum on native Windows (master...210924-portrange) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23089
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] mjdietzx opened pull request #23091: fuzz: fix assertion on the number of required sigs in a bare multisig script (master...fuzz_extract_destinations_bug_fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23091
<prayank>
A user can lock 1 UTXO associated with some transaction to avoid using it. After few days user relaunches Bitcoin Core, forgets about lock being removed, sends some bitcoin to Binance in which this UTXO is used. Binance asks for source of funds etc.
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22009 | wallet: Decide which coin selection solution to use based on waste metric by achow101 · Pull Request #22009 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22009 | wallet: Decide which coin selection solution to use based on waste metric by achow101 · Pull Request #22009 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #23089: ci: Increase the dynamic port range to the maximum on native Windows (master...210924-portrange) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23089
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #23084: test: assert on result instead of log in asmap-addrman test (master...asmap-addrman-test-assert-on-result-instead-of-log) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23084
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke reopened pull request #23083: rpc: Fail to return undocumented or misdocumented JSON (master...2108-docRpc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23083
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #23083: rpc: Fail to return undocumented or misdocumented JSON (master...2108-docRpc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23083
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #23083: rpc: Fail to return undocumented or misdocumented JSON (master...2108-docRpc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23083
<bitcoin-git>
[gui] jarolrod opened pull request #430: Improvements to the open up transaction in third-party link action (master...3party-tx-links-cleanup) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/430
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] brunoerg opened pull request #23080: test: check abandoned tx in listsinceblock (master...2021-09-improv-test-listsinceblock) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23080
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] theStack opened pull request #23079: test: use MiniWallet for p2p_filter.py (master...202109-test-use_MiniWallet_for_p2p_filter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23079
<michaelfolkson>
fi3: There may have been advancements since this was discussed last but some context from previous discussions on Rust is here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17090
<michaelfolkson>
#proposedmeetingtopic (by fi3) rust library in bitcoin core (23049)
<sipa>
#proposedwalletmeetingtopic (by fi3) rust library in bitcoin core (23049)
<jonatack>
yes, on mainnet the most frequent contentions I see are the cs_vNodes ones, and many/most on them were replaced by only a handful of connman.cs_vNodes contention *per hour* instead...grep "connman.cs_vNodes" ~/.bitcoin/debug.log
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master d8b4b30 W. J. van der Laan: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23057: log: Consolidate timedata logging
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #23076: Pass CFeeRate and CTxMemPool in-params by reference to const (master...feerate-and-txmempool-fixups) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23076
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] darosior opened pull request #23075: refactoring: Fee estimation functional test cleanups (master...fee_est_test_cleanup) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23075
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #23054: Use C++11 member initializer in CTxMemPoolEntry (master...2109-cpp11MemberInitMempool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23054
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa08d4c MarcoFalke: Use C++11 member initializer in CTxMemPoolEntry
<jeremyrubin>
I think what we'd want is to remove the http support from Bitcoin core and then build a separate binary with a simple http proxy to it
<sipa>
you can also use bitcoin core RPC in a local trusted network
<sipa>
*anything* could have been chosen for bitcoin core's RPC interface, but the one that was chosen was json-rpc over http with user/pass authentication
<sipa>
michaelfolkson: c-lightning just calls bitcoin-cli
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #22966: doc: Improve documentation around the ACK statement (master...ack-documentation) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22966
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] meshcollider opened pull request #23065: Allow UTXO locks to be written to wallet DB (master...202109_lockunspent_persistence) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23065
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #23064: fuzz: Fix memory leak in system fuzz target (master...2109-fuzzMemLeakSys) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23064
<prayank>
paulo: There are lot of things to work on. You can start with https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22368 (It's less than 20 lines of code if correctly done but nobody wants to work on it for some reason)
<prayank>
paulo: if you have things in wishlist that improve privacy in bitcoin core but you don't feel like creating an issue in the repository, feel free to write them down in a gist and share the link here. Will be helpful.
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #23060: release: increase minimum compiler and lib(std)c++ requirements (master...23_0_min_compiler_libcpp_requires) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23060
<prayank>
instagibbs: 1. Not sure tbh how will things change if different mempool policies are used however it looks less likely in near future looking at the trend. Most users will run Bitcoin Core and they will use defaults. 2. Things are simple. There are blocks which get mined every few minutes. Blocks have limit based on vsize or weight. So everyone is bidding and competing to get their transactions confirmed. There is nothing to estimate or predict but
<dviola>
when I receive a tx in bitcoin core 22.0.0 the clock icon (before the date field) in the Transactions tab says I have 1 of 6 confirmations
<prayank>
If I want to buy bitcoin right now, I will look at the orderbook and create limit buy order at 42200. I won't check last 1000 trades because they don't matter if goal is to buy bitcoin asap.
<laanwj>
but sure, agree it makes sense to prefix, all the bitcoin-core channels were prefixed with bitcoin-core when moving to libera
<jeremy>
not sure who owns the #bitcoin namespace tho
<jeremy>
yes, aware of that. I think it's that they prefer whoever owns the #bitcoin namespace should encourage/assist allocating bip reviews as ##bitcoin-bip-review-<name> or something going forward.
<jeremy>
laanwj, not sure if you "own" the IRC, but as a general rule the #libera folk asked me to relay that they strongly prefer we not use channels like ##ctv-bip-review or ##taproot-bip-review in the future and instead namespace them in #bitcoin
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #22734: addrman: Avoid crash on corrupt data, Force Check after deserialize (master...2108-addrmanNoCrash) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22734
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fae5c63 MarcoFalke: move-only: Move CAddrMan::Check to cpp file
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa29897 MarcoFalke: Refactor: Turn the internal addrman check helper into a forced check
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #23054: Use C++11 member initializer in CTxMemPoolEntry (master...2109-cpp11MemberInitMempool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23054
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #23053: [fuzz] Use public methods in addrman fuzz tests (master...2021-09-addrman-fuzzer-public-methods2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23053
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Shubhankar-Gambhir opened pull request #23052: test: use miniwallet in test_rpc function in feature_rbf.py (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23052
<Kiminuo>
jonatack: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12677#pullrequestreview-759043318 - I don't really want to try to beat somebody in addressing these but I should have some time over the coming days to address that so I'll do it, ok? Saying that just because I don't want to compete with somebody
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #23050: log: change an incorrect fee to fee rate, and vice-versa (master...fee-vs-feerate) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23050