< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #19304: test: Check that message sends successfully when header is split across two buffers (master...2020-06-test-partial) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19304
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 343c0bf MarcoFalke: Merge #19304: test: Check that message sends successfully when header is s...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 80d4423 Troy Giorshev: Test buffered valid message
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jamesgmorgan opened pull request #19317: Add a left-justified width field to log2_work component for a uniform debug.log output (master...jmorgan-updatetipfmt) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19317
< sipa>
they're slower in adopting language changes than bitcoin core :p
< gwillen>
is this a feature of the particular annotations that happen to be available in the bitcoin core codebase? It's certainly not a feature of annotations in general.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] andrewtoth closed pull request #18941: validation: Persist coins cache to disk and load on startup (master...persist-coinscache) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18941
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] amitiuttarwar opened pull request #19316: [net] Cleanup logic around connection types (master...2020-06-conn-refactor) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] amitiuttarwar opened pull request #19315: [tests] Allow outbound & block-relay-only connections in functional tests. (master...2020-06-test-outbounds) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19315
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] renepickhardt opened pull request #19314: refactor: Use uint16_t instead of unsigned short (master...akh_uint16_t) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19314
< achow101>
I think the descriptor wallets project (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/12) can be closed. unless we want to add the sqlite stuff to it, but I think that would be better to go into it's own project
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #19302: test: Check that peer is disconnected for bad buffered message (master...2006-badBuffer) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19302
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] troygiorshev opened pull request #19304: test: Check that message sends successfully when header is split across two buffers (master...2020-06-test-partial) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19304
< achow101>
Anyone else seeing "/usr/bin/ld: bitcoin_wallet-bitcoin-wallet.o:(.data.rel.ro+0x8): undefined reference to `InitError(bilingual_str const&)'" on master?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #19302: test: Check that peer is disconnected for bad buffered message (master...2006-badBuffer) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19302
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #19301: build: don't warn when doxygen isn't found (master...no_warn_doxygen_missing) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19301
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #19295: refactor: Use AbortError in FatalError (master...2006-refactorAbortError) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19295
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa02b47 MarcoFalke: refactor: Use AbortError in FatalError
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 39bd9dd MarcoFalke: Merge #19295: refactor: Use AbortError in FatalError
< achow101>
e.g. HWI used to be achow101/HWI and achow101/HWI now permanently redirects to bitcoin-core/HWI
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18275: wallet: error if an explicit fee rate was given but the needed fee rate differed (master...2003-wallet-error-on-feechange) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18275
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 23b2a68 MarcoFalke: Merge #18275: wallet: error if an explicit fee rate was given but the need...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 44cc75f Karl-Johan Alm: wallet: error if an explicit fee rate was given but the needed fee rate di...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #18434: tests: add a test-security target and run it in CI (master...run_security_check_ci) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18434
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master f658c15 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #18434: tests: add a test-security target and run it in CI
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 968aaae fanquake: tests: run test-security-check.py in CI
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 9fe71a5 fanquake: test: use subprocess.run() in test-security-check.py
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #19251: [Do Not Merge] ci: Temporary Test Case for negative capabilities in the Clang Thread Safety annotations (master...200611-dnm-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19251
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] glowang opened pull request #19297: [test] WIP: rewrite generate() in test_node to gain determinism in test data (master...2020/05/21/rewrite_generate_in_testnode) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19297
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #19296: tests: Add fuzzing harness for AES{CBC,}256{Encrypt,Decrypt} (crypto/aes.h) (master...fuzzers-more-crypto) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19296
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #19295: refactor: Use AbortError in FatalError (master...2006-refactorAbortError) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19295
< wumpus>
that would be my personal preference at least, to have all active development happen under bitcoin-core and (lower traffic, but critical) "specs"/protocol work remain under bitcoin
< wumpus>
but all new repositories are created under bitcoin-core, at some point, if enough things split off from the main codebase, at some point maybe only the consensus code (and bips) will be left under bitcoin
< wumpus>
elichai2: because it seems better to keep bitcoin/bitcoin there for now
< elichai2>
wumpus: FYI, why is there still bitcoin and bitcoin-core as different orgs? (I mistype sometimes when I move between secp and bitcoin)
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto reopened pull request #18298: build: Fix Qt processing of configure script for depends with DEBUG=1 (master...20200309-depends-debug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18298
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #18298: build: Fix Qt processing of configure script for depends with DEBUG=1 (master...20200309-depends-debug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18298
< wumpus>
I've updated the bitcoin/frequent-contributors bitcoin-core/frequent-contributors to have the same people in it, so if you get a seemingly spurious invite that's the reason
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] ajtowns closed pull request #18238: net_processing: Retry notfounds with more urgency (master...202002-bump-notfound) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18238
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] pstratem opened pull request #19280: Verify the block filter hash when reading from disk. (master...2020-06-14-blockfilterindex-checksums) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19280
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #18361: build: Make the help string for --with-gui configure option unambiguous (master...20200316-with-gui) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18361
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #18297: build: Use pkg-config in BITCOIN_QT_CONFIGURE for all hosts including Windows (master...20200308-pkgconfig-mingw) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18297
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18297 | build: Use pkg-config in BITCOIN_QT_CONFIGURE for all hosts including Windows by hebasto · Pull Request #18297 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #19264: [tests] Don't import asyncio to test magic bytes (master...2020-06-magic-bytes-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19264
< jonasschnelli>
jamesob: I think a way would be: start in your own personal account (or a new entity), find (a) capable maintainer(s), find contributors. If there is acceptable development performance, migrate it to the bitcoin-core github organization.
< jamesob>
jonasschnelli: yeah, I agree - just might be good to have one that's clearly maintained by the bitcoin github org
< jamesob>
Curious - is there a compelling reason against pulling out all the indexes into a separate codebase/runtime, perhaps also in a repo under the bitcoin org? Only exception I can think of would be that `getrawtransaction` rpc would need to be moved into that codebase for txindex=1, but is there any other instance where existing core behavior relies on the existence of those indexes?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #19259: tests: Add fuzzing harness for LoadMempool(...) and DumpMempool(...) (master...fuzzers-mempool-io) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19259
< Kiminuo>
Hi, is there some consensus regarding migration from c++11 to c++17 in Bitcoin core? I mean it seems that c++17 is not as widespread as I thought. So the migration will happen in medium term horizon, right? Like maybe in a year or two, right?
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19216 | wallet: Remove first parameter to ScanForWalletTransactions start_hash by pstratem · Pull Request #19216 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< wumpus>
yes before upgrading bitcoin core (definitely the major version) you need to make sure your other software is compatible
< wumpus>
no changes to bitcoin coren eeded, at all
< yevaud>
jeremyrubin: it turns out that breaking up bitcoin into different daemons needs a comical amount of state exposed, sadly.
< jeremyrubin>
and bitcoin-node is the just network process
< dongcarl>
Perhaps a good topic for some day where there aren't many topics is: what things can we remove from bitcoin-core that would have a net-positive impact?
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19251 | [Do Not Merge] ci: Temporary Test Case for negative capabilities in the Clang Thread Safety annotations by hebasto · Pull Request #19251 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #19251: [Do Not Merge] ci: Temporary Test Case for negative capabilities in the Clang Thread Safety annotations (master...200611-dnm-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19251
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19249 | Add means to handle negative capabilities in the Clang Thread Safety annotations by hebasto · Pull Request #19249 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #19250: wallet: [move-only bugfix] Make RPC help compile-time static (master...2006-rpcWalletHelp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19250
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #19249: Add means to handle negative capabilities in the Clang Thread Safety annotations (master...200611-nc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19249
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #19243: banman: Limit resources consumed by misbehaving node deprioitisation (master...misbehaving_limit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19243
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto reopened pull request #19238: refactor: Replace RecursiveMutex with Mutex in CAddrMan (master...200610-addrman-mx) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19238
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #19238: refactor: Replace RecursiveMutex with Mutex in CAddrMan (master...200610-addrman-mx) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19238
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #19242: Add -uaappend option to append a literal string to user agent (master...uaappend) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19242