< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #18445: tests: Add fuzzing harnesses for functions/classes in chain.h and protocol.h (master...fuzzers-misc-3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18445
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #18444: Bugfix: RPC: Remove final comma for last entry of fixed-size arrays in RPCResult (master...bugfix_rr_arrfixed_comma) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18444
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] vasild opened pull request #18443: lockedpool: avoid sensitive data in core files (FreeBSD) (master...madvise) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18443
< cfields>
luke-jr: right, I was implying that the runtime check isn't actually all that concerning, as we should assume it's happening in the background as well. So just _having_ Bitcoin Core could cause you to leak :\
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #15600: lockedpool: When possible, use madvise to avoid including sensitive information in core dumps (master...lockedpool_dontdump) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15600
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 23991ee Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #15600: lockedpool: When possible, use madvise to avoid including se...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master d831831 Luke Dashjr: lockedpool: When possible, use madvise to avoid including sensitive inform...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke reopened pull request #15704: Move Win32 defines to configure.ac to ensure they are globally defined (master...win32_defines_globally) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15704
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #15704: Move Win32 defines to configure.ac to ensure they are globally defined (master...win32_defines_globally) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15704
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18434: tests: add a test-security target and run it in CI (master...run_security_check_ci) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18434
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] pierreN opened pull request #18433: serialization: prevent int overflow for big Coin::nHeight (master...fix-coin-serialize) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18433
2020-03-25
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #18432: util: Make current implicit C++ locale assumption in tfm::format(...) explicit (master...cpp-locale) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18432
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15600 | lockedpool: When possible, use madvise to avoid including sensitive information in core dumps by luke-jr · Pull Request #15600 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #18134: Replace std::to_string with locale-independent alternative (master...2020-02-to-string) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18134
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 2e97d80 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #18134: Replace std::to_string with locale-independent alternative
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master d056df0 Ben Woosley: Replace std::to_string with locale-independent alternative
< fjahr>
wumpus: that looks like the same issue that I saw here https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-maintainer-tools/pull/54 I think while there could be something wrong on travis side, Github should definitely not hide the check either way. I will report it to Github as a bug.
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15600 | lockedpool: When possible, use madvise to avoid including sensitive information in core dumps by luke-jr · Pull Request #15600 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15600 | lockedpool: When possible, use madvise to avoid including sensitive information in core dumps by luke-jr · Pull Request #15600 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #18402: gui: display mapped AS in peers info window (master...gui-peers-display-mapped_as) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18402
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 244e88e Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #18402: gui: display mapped AS in peers info window
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15704 | Move Win32 defines to configure.ac to ensure they are globally defined by luke-jr · Pull Request #15704 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17740 | build: remove configure checks for win libraries we dont link against by fanquake · Pull Request #17740 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2020-03-24
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] theStack opened pull request #18426: scripts: previous_release: improve behaviour on failed download (master...20200324-scripts-previous-release-show-error-message-if-download-fails) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18426
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #18425: releases: Update with new Windows code signing certificate (master...win-cert-3-20) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18425
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #18424: qt: Use parent-child relation to manage lifetime of OptionsModel object (master...20200324-options-model) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18424
< wumpus>
looks like i still have access to travis for bitcoin/bitcoin
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #18423: tests: Add fuzzing harness for classes/functions in blockfilter.h. Add integer {de,}serialization fuzzing. (master...fuzzers-misc-2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18423
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #18422: [consensus] MOVEONLY: Move single-sig checking EvalScript code to EvalChecksig (master...2020-03-evalchecksig) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18422
< achow101>
is anyone else missing bitcoin/bitcoin on the travis.org sidebar (under My Repositories)?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] naumenkogs opened pull request #18421: Periodically update DNS caches for better privacy of non reachable-nodes (master...2020_03_dns_cache_update) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18421
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #18417: tests: Add fuzzing harnesses for functions in addrdb.h, net_permissions.h and timedata.h (master...fuzzers-misc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18417
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] pierreN opened pull request #18416: Prevent num op overflows in ParseScript() helper (master...fix-parsescript-numop-overflow) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18416
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18415: scripts: add MACHO tests to test-security-check.py (master...add_MACHO_to_security_check) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18415
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] pierreN opened pull request #18413: script: prevent UB when computing abs value for num opcode serialize (master...fix-script-absolute) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18413
< fjahr>
stevenroose: You mean the genesis coinbase tx, right? It is not in the utxo set and it should also not be in txindex. It was never indexed by satoshis original software and changing it would be a change in consensus rules, however unlikely it is that that output is spent. So I doubt there were any changes, although I don't know. See also the discussion here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/3303
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #18410: Docs: Improve commenting for coins.cpp|h (master...2020-03-coins-comments) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18410
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #18402: gui: display mapped AS in peers info window (master...gui-peers-display-mapped_as) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18402
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #18397: build: Fix libevent linking for bench_bitcoin binary (master...20200321-libevent) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18397
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] theStack opened pull request #18396: rpc: add missing HelpExampleRpc for getblockfilter (master...20200321-rpc-add-missing-rpcexample-for-getblockfilter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18396
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18395: scripts: add PE dylib checking to symbol-check.py (master...pe_dll_checking) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18395
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] brakmic closed pull request #18394: test: added test for JSONRPC-objects (master...expanding-rpc-test-coverage) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18394
2020-03-20
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] brakmic opened pull request #18394: test: added test for JSONRPC-objects (master...expanding-rpc-test-coverage) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18394
< emilengler>
I think this question is probably a bit misplaced here. However maybe #7692 helps you. It was the PR when Bitcoin Core removed the alert system. AFAIK the alert field is still in the protocol but I'm not sure on this.
< dmos>
Why is Bitcoin Core sending an alert message? Is it really a breach of BTC protocol?
< dmos>
To be clear, client is bitcoinj and bitcoin core is the node being connected to.
< dmos>
Greetings from Bisq! Experiencing weird interaction between our (outdated) fork of BitcoinJ and Bitcoin Core 0.19.0.1. This log entry sums it up: `o.b.core.PeerSocketHandler: [127.0.0.1]:18444 - org.bitcoinj.core.ProtocolException: Received AlertMessage before version handshake is complete.`
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] glowang opened pull request #18391: doc: Update init and reduce-traffic docs for -blocksonly (master...update_blocksonly_docs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18391
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18386: doc: Temporary note that release notes should be edited in wiki (master...2020_03_relnot) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18386
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 5bf45fe MarcoFalke: Merge #18386: doc: Temporary note that release notes should be edited in w...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master b492684 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Temporary note that release notes should be edited in wiki
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #18386: doc: Temporary note that release notes should be edited in wiki (master...2020_03_relnot) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18386
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] gzhao408 opened pull request #18384: [test] more specific feature_segwit test error message (master...segwit-test-errormsg) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18384
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18383 | Check for overflow when calculating sum of outputs in a transaction by elichai · Pull Request #18383 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #18340: doc: mention MAKE=gmake workaround when building on a BSD (master...fixup_18129) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18340
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 527c398 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #18340: doc: mention MAKE=gmake workaround when building on a BSD
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 84a46a9 emu: doc: mention MAKE=gmake workaround when building on a BSD
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] elichai opened pull request #18383: Check for overflow when calculating sum of outputs in a transaction (master...2020-03-value-overflow) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18383
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] vasild opened pull request #18382: doc: note the costs of fetching all pull requests (master...note_fetch_all_cost) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18382
< sipa>
or create a new bitcoin-fork-old branch, and swap with it
< fanquake>
wumpus could you swap the default branch for the bitcoin-core/leveldb repo from "bitcoin-fork" to "bitcoin-fork-new" ?
2020-03-18
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift closed pull request #18308: depends: Make it possible to build Boost dependency using a clang toolset (./b2 toolset=clang) (master...b2-toolset-clang) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18308
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #18380: doc: Remove html comment in PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE (master...2003-docGitHubTemplateNoComment) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18380
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18300: fuzz: Add option to merge input dir to test runner (master...Mf1902-fuzzMerge) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18300