< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18300: fuzz: Add option to merge input dir to test runner (master...Mf1902-fuzzMerge) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18300
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18371: test: use fs namespace in dbwrapper unicodepath test (master...dbwrapper_use_fs_namespace) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18371
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18364: random: remove getentropy() fallback for macOS < 10.12 (master...macos_remove_1012_fallback) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18364
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #18363: tests: Add fuzzing harness for HTTPRequest, libevent's evhttp and related functions (master...fuzzers-http_request) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18363
2020-03-16
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18350: test: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new block has the correct hash internally (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18350
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 7060d2d MarcoFalke: Merge #18350: test: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new bl...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 7a6627a Samer Afach: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new block has the
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #18346: rpc: Document an RPCResult for all calls; Enforce at compile time (master...2003-docAllRpcRes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18346
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 25424cf Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #18346: rpc: Document an RPCResult for all calls; Enforce at compile...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fac5225 MarcoFalke: rpc: Document an RPCResult for all calls; Enforce at compile time
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #18360: Bump transifex slug and update English translations for 0.20 (master...2020_03_translations_020x) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18360
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] TheQuantumPhysicist opened pull request #18350: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new block has the correct hash internally (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18350
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #18349: build: Fix quick hack for version string in releases (master...20200314-version-workaround) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18349
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17681 | wallet: Keep inactive seeds after sethdseed and derive keys from them as needed by achow101 · Pull Request #17681 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #18346: rpc: Document an RPCResult for all calls; Enforce at compile time (master...2003-docAllRpcRes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18346
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18340: doc: mention MAKE=gmake workaround when building on a BSD (master...fixup_18129) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18340
< sipa>
if 6 MB is a problem, you probably shouldn't be running bitcoin core
< ysangkok>
luke-jr: bitcoin doesn't use "all of Qt". for example, my libqt5core is only 6 MB. and given that the default desktop isn't qt-based, qt may be loaded solely for bitcoin in case it is dynamically linked
< luke-jr>
and changing bitcoin/bitcoin to a notice of some sort explaining the upgrade paths
< wumpus>
yes +1 with adding a notice to bitcoin/bitcoin at least, no matter if there's any new PPAs
< luke-jr>
would be nice if we could come to some agreement here to present to BlueMatt.. maybe "two new PPAs, and bump bitcoin/bitcoin with a notice"?
< luke-jr>
MarcoFalke: I don't know how BlueMatt setup the Launchpad stuff - I suspect the account is his personal account, and ~bitcoin is just a team with only him
< luke-jr>
achow101: currently only BlueMatt has a monopoly on the 'bitcoin' name
< achow101>
I think we have to keep bitcoin/bitcoin just to keep existing docs working and not confusing existing users further
< luke-jr>
back to the original topic though, bitcoin/bitcoin seems like a bad URI IMO
< luke-jr>
hebasto: 2019-09, there were still around 8000 users of the PPA at bitcoin/bitcoin
< luke-jr>
anyway, how about adding a disclaimer to the effect of "These are built by Canonical, not the Bitcoin Core project"?
< luke-jr>
bitcoin/bitcoin has always been system libs
< MarcoFalke>
bitcoin/bitcoin would be deterministic and luke-jr/bitcoin is built with system libs
< sipa>
bitcoincore.org or bitcoin.org linked to it as a way of installing
< wumpus>
well the "bitcoin" PPA is his so as for maintining that that's his decision, if you maintain youre own somewhere else that's fine, but we likely won't link to it
< achow101>
I think it should remain at 'bitcoin' as that's where a bunch of docs that mention the ppa point to
< luke-jr>
the only question in my mind is whether it should remain at 'bitcoin' as some have suggested, or move to my own launchpad
< vasild>
provoostenator: I found out that https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp#L151 is very close to what's needed to reproduce the out-of-order block feeding wrt #17994. I am now replacing its random multi-threaded call of ProcessNewBlock() with a signle-threaded deterministic out-of-order block supply. Lets see what happens...
< vasild>
kallewoof: I am going to test https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17994 today and I wonder if there is a better way than just start it to download blocks and try to observe how it behaves. Is there a way to test in a controlled environment where we feed out-of-order blocks to it deterministically?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #18285: test: Check that wait_until returns if time point is in the past (master...2002-debugBoost) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18285
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master d20d5dc Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #18285: test: Check that wait_until returns if time point is in the ...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fab7d14 MarcoFalke: test: Check that wait_until returns if time point is in the past
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke reopened pull request #18300: fuzz: Add option to merge input dir to test runner (master...Mf1902-fuzzMerge) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18300