< bitcoin-git>
[gui] luke-jr opened pull request #230: Support backup to new text-based database dump format (master...gui_backup_formats) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/230
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21166 | Have SignatureExtractorChecker subclass MutableTransactionSignatureChecker by achow101 · Pull Request #21166 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2021-02-26
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] dongcarl opened pull request #21304: guix: Various user workflow improvements (master...2021-02-guix-clean-script) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21304
< MarcoFalke>
An organization owner has approved the following application to access private data in the Bitcoin Core organization:"Travis CI" from Travis CI GmbH
< wumpus>
the bitcoin organization does not have this policy enabled at all
< wumpus>
i think i understand now: bitcoin-core has a policy enabled where third-party applications (enabled by organization members) have restricted access to the repositories in the organization, by adding an exception to that page, they can at most get the same permissions as the member (but up to what they actually grant)
< wumpus>
neither bitcoin nor bitcoin-core has any private repositories at least
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] S3RK opened pull request #21302: wallet: createwallet examples for descriptor wallets (master...create_descriptor_help) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21302
< achow101>
strangely it was already available for the bitcoin org but not bitcoin-core
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20892 | tests: Run both descriptor and legacy tests within a single test invocation by achow101 · Pull Request #20892 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21083 | wallet: Avoid requesting fee rates multiple times during coin selection by achow101 · Pull Request #21083 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] hebasto opened pull request #228: Drop unused parameter in GUIUtil::get{Save|Open}FileName (master...210224-file) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/228
< amiti>
is the core reasoning to prevent the sorta attack mentioned in this comment: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21224#issuecomment-781741925, where a peer who sends a valid txn that activates lots of invalid orphans would take up our CPU time instead of the one who will eventually be punished?
< jnewbery>
my last proposal was to move orphan reprocessing to a global work queue: ttps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19364 , but moving it to the work queue of the peer who sent it also seems fine
< linkrage>
Hi, I've just compiled bitcoin-0.8.6 from source on Ubuntu 14.04 (on purpose). It doesn't build bitcoin-cli and looks like that's on purpose ? How dow I communicate with bitcoind to set a passphrase on wallet etc. - curl only ?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #21078: guix: only download sources for hosts being built (master...guix_selective_download) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21078
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 3371758 fanquake: Merge #21078: guix: only download sources for hosts being built
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master a6a1b10 fanquake: guix: only download sources for hosts being built
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21263: doc: Clarify that squashing should happen before review (master...2102-docSquash) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21263
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21202: [validation] Two small clang lock annotation improvements (master...2021-02-locks) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21202
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 34d7030 MarcoFalke: Merge #21202: [validation] Two small clang lock annotation improvements
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 25c57d6 Amiti Uttarwar: [doc] Add a note about where lock annotations should go.
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master ad5f01b Amiti Uttarwar: [validation] Move the lock annotation from function definition to declarat...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #20845: net: Log to net debug in MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect except for noban and manual peers (master...2101-netLogDisconnect) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20845
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 4b6ca4a MarcoFalke: Merge #20845: net: Log to net debug in MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect except...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa55159 MarcoFalke: net: Log to net debug in MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect except for noban and...
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] MarcoFalke merged pull request #206: Display fRelayTxes and bip152_highbandwidth_{to, from} in peer details (master...add-fields-to-peer-details) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/206
< wumpus>
i'm afraid as bitcoin gets more popular we're going to have to get used to a certain percentage of spam and nonsense PRs which are out of scopre of the project, let's leave it at that
2021-02-21
< michaelfolkson>
Regardless if there is no legal uncertainty with the bitcoin.org link we should probably just link to that. Or respond with a drafted statement to closed PRs to calm the anger
< luke-jr>
michaelfolkson: indeed, that's strictly abusive of Bitcoin and harms the entire network permanently.
< luke-jr>
michaelfolkson: shrug. I don't see any harm in a link to bitcoin.org, but it's also not worth fighting about if others disagree.
< michaelfolkson>
But if bitcoin.org is superior from a legal uncertainty perspective maybe we should add that? I'm not entirely sure what is going on behind the scenes with CSW nonsense and I'm certainly no legal expert
< luke-jr>
michaelfolkson: doesn't seem to be any basis for legal uncertainty if it's just a link, especially to bitcoin.org where Satoshi himself published it
< michaelfolkson>
"Thank you for your pull request to Bitcoin Core. We have received many similar pull requests to add a link to the white paper but due to legal uncertainty and in the interests of not taking up any more of reviewers' time we will be instantly closing any such pull requests."
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] theStack reopened pull request #21250: build: make HAVE_O_CLOEXEC available outside LevelDB (bugfix) (master...2021-02-build-pass-have_o_cloexec) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21250
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] theStack closed pull request #21250: build: make HAVE_O_CLOEXEC available outside LevelDB (bugfix) (master...2021-02-build-pass-have_o_cloexec) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21250
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21255: contrib: run test-symbol-check for RISC-V (master...riscv_test_symbol_check) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21255
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21254: test: Avoid connecting to real network when running tests (master...2102-testNoTelemetry) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21254
< wumpus>
i think what i need is a way to generate a *derived xpub* for a custom path in the wallet, i can do this with external tooling (e.g. darosior's bip32 python module), but afaik not from bitcoin core itself?