PSA: I've invited jonatack to the bitcoin and bitcoin-core orgs, seems a frequent enough contributor, also sipsorcery a few days ago (I was surprised the MSVC build maintainer wasn't in the org yet)
[bitcoin] jnewbery closed pull request #16682: p2p: Disconnect peer that send us tx INVs when we opted out of tx relay (master...2019-08-disconnect-blocksonly-violators) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16682
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #15888: QA: Add wallet_implicitsegwit to test the ability to transform keys between address types (master...test_wallet_implicitsegwit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15888
Here's a reductionist viewpoint: It's not worth jumping through too many hoops for apple users, because ultimately if the person shipping your kernel decides you don't want them running bitcoin, or a version of bitcoin, you're already, to put it lightly, fucked
provoostenator: it would be a bad idea for bitcoin, so for bitcoin we should reject it
dongcarl: yes, and that's inevitible. Because we ARE bitcoin core. You know, the thing they're scanning their binaries for :)
I've been rebasing a commit similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16681 for years (which is a bit annoying as new instances appeared) and people are still complaining because it is not complete and more instances may appear.
[bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #17304: refactor: Move many functions into LegacyScriptPubKeyMan and further separate it from CWallet (master...wallet-box-pr-3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17304