< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] theStack opened pull request #21728: remove executable flag for src/net_processing.cpp (master...2021-remove-exec-flag-from-net_processing) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21728
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] JeremyRubin closed pull request #21721: [WIP][POC][DONOTMERGE] Flag Day ST Compatible Logic w/ Optional Mandatory Signalling (0.21...uasf) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21721
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] JeremyRubin opened pull request #21721: [WIP][POC][DONOTMERGE] Flag Day ST Compatible Logic w/ Optional Mandatory Signalling (0.21...uasf) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21721
2021-04-17
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21719: refactor: Add and use EnsureConnman in rpc code (master...2104-netConnman) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21719
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] MarcoFalke merged pull request #277: Do not use QClipboard::Selection on Windows and macOS. (master...210410-clip) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/277
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #21713: Refactor ProcessNewBlock to reduce code duplication (master...RefactorProcessNewBlock) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21713
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] promag opened pull request #21712: qa: Test default include_mempool value of gettxout (master...2021-04-gettxout) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21712
< achow101>
Signature appears to be valid, but opening the .app results in "Bitcoin Core.app was blocked from use because it is not from an identified developer"
< Kiminuo>
Hi guys, a quick question: I have this PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21244 and it got one ACK. Now, should I just wait patiently until somebody else will review the PR? Or am I supposed to do something else to increase the chance of merging it? I'm not in hurry. I would just like to understand the review process better.
< provoostenator>
I suspect most of the Lnd / Btcd based lightning wallets also use p2p to discover bitcoin peers.
< harding>
amiti: re your mailing list post, I know that in 2015 BRD wallet used addr messages to find nodes but I don't think it sent any messages. Obviously that was eons ago in Bitcoin time and I don't know what it does now.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #21697: DONOTMERGE test: drop cnetaddr link-local assert for all CIs except macOS 10.14 (master...cnetaddr-link-local-test-2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21697
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #21697: DONOTMERGE test: drop cnetaddr link-local assert for all CIs except macOS 10.14 (master...cnetaddr-link-local-test-2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21697
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #21696: DONOTMERGE test: drop cnetaddr link-local assert for macOS 10.14 to re-verify CI (master...cnetaddr-link-local-test-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21696
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #21695: Remove no longer used contrib/bitcoin-qt.pro from the repo (master...210415-pro) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21695
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #21694: build: Use XLIFF file to provide more context to Transifex translators (master...210415-xliff) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21694
< hebasto>
wumpus: I cannot see any way how the `contrib/bitcoin-qt.pro` is used in the translation process, neither in the main repo nor in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-maintainer-tools. Besides it looks outdated and unmaintained. May I ask you to confirm/deny my assumption?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21691: test: Check that no versionbits are re-used (master...2104-testVersionbits) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21691
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #21690: test: use higher value in cnetaddr_basic link-local test (master...cnetaddr-link-local-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21690
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #21689: test: Remove intermittently failing and not very meaningful `BOOST_CHECK` in `cnetaddr_basic` (master...remove-intermittently-failing-and-largely-meaningless-ipv6-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21689
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #21680: test: Use called_from_lib to point uninstrumented libs to TSan (master...210414-tsan) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21680
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21677: fuzz: Avoid use of low file descriptor ids (which may be in use) in FuzzedSock (master...avoid-open-fds-when-fuzzing) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21677
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 9712f75 MarcoFalke: Merge #21677: fuzz: Avoid use of low file descriptor ids (which may be in ...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 6262182 practicalswift: Avoid use of low file descriptor ids (which may be in use) in FuzzedSock a...
< amiti>
kanzure: it was very odd, my email address wouldn't subscribe to bitcoin-dev, so per ReubenSomsen's suggestion we debugged by using bitcoin-discuss
< kanzure>
amiti: also you may have sent to bitcoin-discuss instead of bitcoin-dev
< da2ce7_>
wumpus: "<bitcoin-git> [gui] laanwj merged pull request #260: Handle exceptions instead of crash (master...210326-ex) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/260" the merge script seems to have a bug...
< jonasschnelli>
#proposedmeetingtopic short info/update on the "Bitcoin Core Code Signing Association" status.
< BlueMatt>
plus voskuil *normally* disagrees very strongly on bitcoin fork activation stuff, so him agreeing is a pretty good "did we even slightly screw this up" check
< _Sam-->
Hi I just wanted to say thank you for doing all that work to make bitcoin. I appreciate you. I sit around and don't do anything, and make money just because of the work you did. Thanks dudes/girls. Have a nice day.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #21680: test: Use called_from_lib to point uninstrumented libs to TSan (master...210414-tsan) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21680
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] promag opened pull request #21679: rpc: Keep default argument value in correct type (master...2021-04-rpc-defaults) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21679
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #21677: fuzz: Avoid use of low file descriptor ids (which may be in use) in FuzzedSock (master...avoid-open-fds-when-fuzzing) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21677
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21676: test: Use mocktime to avoid intermittent failure in rpc_tests (master...2104-testFixMocktime) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21676
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21675: ci: Only cache depends/sdk-sources for macos task in cirrus (master...2104-ciSdkMacosOnly) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21675
< sipa>
you don't need to do anything in general; bitcoin core will try to make connections to the network automatically
< GarouDan>
Thanks for these suggestions (#bitcoin or on https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com), I'll try to reach these options later as well, for future interactions
< wumpus>
after the so-manieth spat with Cobra i was sick of it, no idea if it will continue hosting bitcoin core binaries at all, but i'm no longer going to upload them
< wumpus>
i do not have access to bitcoin.org anymore
< achow101>
harding: wumpus: can you make the same change to bitcoin.org that was done for bitcoincore.org to redirect users to download the 0.21-win-unsigned.exe? I'm seeing several users posting issues there about that.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21664: contrib: use LIEF for macOS and Windows symbol & security checks (master...macos_win_lief) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21664
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #21330: Deal with missing data in signature hashes more consistently (master...202103_missing_data_verify) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21330
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 497718b Pieter Wuille: Treat amount<0 also as missing data for P2WPKH/P2WSH
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 3820090 Pieter Wuille: Make all SignatureChecker explicit about missing data
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master b77b0cc Pieter Wuille: Add MissingDataBehavior and make TransactionSignatureChecker handle it