< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] luke-jr closed pull request #15421: torcontrol: Launch a private Tor instance when not already running (master...tor_subprocess) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15421
< satoshin>
If you want to know before who is Satoshi Nakamoto or you think is the best to not to share his identity I would like to read your arguments by email: contact@bitcoin.foundation (Satoshi Nakamoto is one person and he still lives until this day in the UK) I swear to God. Again the real reason why he used a Japanese name is because he loves Sushi! :)
< satoshin>
publications with JGAAP (Java Graphical Authorship Attribution Program) and it is confirmed that he wrote the Bitcoin white paper. Satoshi made a huge mistake when started promoting Bitcoin with Hal Finney and this allowed me Zoltan Konder to track him down. I will announce his identity on https://bitcoin.foundation in the coming days!
< satoshin>
Just to be clear actually Satoshi made a mistake in January of 2009 and I was able to track him down. I know who is him. He is over 50 now, lives in the UK and has children. He also loves Sushi. Beleive me I do know who is Satoshi Nakamoto and I can tell you that much that the Bitcoin white paper was not his first white paper. I did tested all his
< harding>
For Bitcoin nostalgia, #bitcoin is a better room.
< satoshin>
Actually at one point https://archive.org/details/bitcoin-a-peer-to-peer-electronic-cash-system was uploaded to Bitcoin.org according to his announcement. I actaully do have Bitcoin v 0.1.0 also which is compressed by Satoshi for release on 7 January 2009, 4 days after the genesis block.
< satoshin>
you basically saying we not going to develop a peer-to-peer electronic cash system on a peer-to-peer network which is absurd in my opinion. you make a decision about where Bitcoin will be developed like you own the copyright to Bitcoin or something
< luke-jr>
sorry, thought this was #bitcoin
< sipa>
for questions on how to use bitcoin core like your question above, i suggest https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com (some people here including me are pretty active there)
< sipa>
this channel is for technical discussion on bitcoin core development
< satoshin>
https://web.archive.org/*/hrf.org/donate-bitcoin is started in March of 2019 after that they failed to bully us with trademarks in EU and USA
< satoshin>
and we do accept Bitcoin for years pulicly
< satoshin>
the New York based ultra right-wing hrf in the other hand started they website for Bitcoin to attack our finances
< luke-jr>
the legitimacy or not of the Bitcoin Foundation is debatable, but they are the entity
< luke-jr>
well, first of all, you're not the Bitcoin Foundation
< luke-jr>
satoshin: "Donate Bitcoin to the Bitcoin Foundation by sending Bitcoin donations to the Human Rights Foundation."
< satoshin>
I actually trying to figure out the way to not to have Bitcoin node on public IP addresses at all. The real problem with Bitcoin is that nodes are stored on a IP address and not on devices of the participants. I did created a fork of ZeroNet (https://zeronet.io) but I did failed to share the blockchain between two nodes on this network.
< shesek>
it seems like `getblockstats`'s `txs` field does count the coinbase, despite the documentation saying otherwise? `bitcoin-cli getblockstats 644498 '["txs"]'` returns 1
< kallewoof>
sipa: don't wanna derail the thread, but in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19628#discussion_r473522167 you are saying it's UB, but if I read your code, the only difference is that you cast `a` to a uint8_t* in the `memcpy` call; or are you referring to my second option without `memcpy`?
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19710 | bench: Prevent thread oversubscription and decreases the variance of result values by hebasto · Pull Request #19710 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] dongcarl opened pull request #19764: depends: Split boost into build/host packages + bump + cleanup (master...2020-08-boost-build-pickup) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19764
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] vasild opened pull request #19763: net: don't try to relay to node that knows an addr (master...only_relay_to_unaware) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19763
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #19762: rpc: Allow named and positional arguments to be used together (master...pr/named) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19762
< satoshin>
You can send the list by email to: contact@bitcoin.foundation or post it here.
< satoshin>
I working on the https://BITCOIN.FOUNDATION domain and I need a list about the Bitcoin core developers (preferably with PGP public keys attached to the list)
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #19761: build: improve sed robustness by not using sed (master...maximum_sed_robustness) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19761
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #19759: [doc] Struct members should have m_ prefix (master...2020-08-struct-members) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19759
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #19758: Drop deprecated and unused GUARDED_VAR and PT_GUARDED_VAR annotations (master...200818-tsa) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19758
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] vasild closed pull request #18857: build: avoid repetitions when enabling warnings in configure.ac (master...avoid_repetitions_in_configure.ac) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18857
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #16641: refactor: Improve special member functions definitions (master...20190817-psbt-copy-ctor) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16641
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] JeremyRubin opened pull request #19757: net/net_processing: Convert net std::list buffers to std::forward_list (master...net-list-type) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19757
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] kallewoof opened pull request #19756: tests: add sync_all to fix race condition in wallet groups test (master...202008-wallet-groups-sync-all) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19756
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #19754: wallet: Move UpdateWalletSetting to wallet module and use from GUI interface (master...load-on-start-gui) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19754
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] slmtpz opened pull request #19752: test: Update wait_until usage in tests not to use the one from utils (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19752
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #19745: build: Drop back compatibility code for 32-bit x86 Linux binaries (master...200817-i686) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19745
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #19745: build: Drop back compatibility code for 32-bit x86 Linux binaries (master...200817-i686) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19745
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] meshcollider merged pull request #14582: wallet: always do avoid partial spends if fees are within a specified range (master...181026-try-avoidpartialspends) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14582
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master c831e10 Samuel Dobson: Merge #14582: wallet: always do avoid partial spends if fees are within a ...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 7f13dfb Karl-Johan Alm: test: test the implicit avoid partial spends functionality
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master b82067b Karl-Johan Alm: wallet: try -avoidpartialspends mode and use its result if fees are below ...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #19740: [0.20] wallet: Simplify and fix CWallet::SignTransaction (0.20...backport-17204-fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19740
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18115 | wallet: Pass in transactions and messages for signing instead of exporting the private keys by achow101 · Pull Request #18115 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17204 | wallet: Do not turn OP_1NEGATE in scriptSig into 0x0181 in signing code (sipa) by meshcollider · Pull Request #17204 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< shesek>
achow101, one unintended side-effect is that spending from that address reveals that you're using bitcoin core. but that can only be an issue if someone learns your xpub, which should not really happen normally anyway
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa6583c MarcoFalke: ci: Set increased --timeout-factor by default
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #19134: test: Replace global wait_until with BitcoinTestFramework.wait_until and mininode.wait_until (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19134
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #19731: net, rpc: expose nLastBlockTime/nLastTXTime as last block/last_transaction in getpeerinfo (master...add-eviction-criteria-to-getpeerinfo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19731
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #19730: ci: Set increased --timeout-factor by default (master...2008-ciTimeoutDefault) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19730
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #19728: Increase the ip address relay branching factor for unreachable networks (master...202008_increase_addr_branching) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19728
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] meshcollider merged pull request #17458: Refactor OutputGroup effective value calculations and filtering to occur within the struct (master...cleanup-outputgroups) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17458
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master f269165 Samuel Dobson: Merge #17458: Refactor OutputGroup effective value calculations and filter...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 9adc2f8 Andrew Chow: Refactor OutputGroups to handle effective values, fees, and filtering
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 7d07e86 Andrew Chow: Use real value when calculating OutputGroup value
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17458 | Refactor OutputGroup effective value calculations and filtering to occur within the struct by achow101 · Pull Request #17458 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14582 | wallet: always do avoid partial spends if fees are within a specified range by kallewoof · Pull Request #14582 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #17204: wallet: Do not turn OP_1NEGATE in scriptSig into 0x0181 in signing code (sipa) (master...201910_1negate_rebase) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17204
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 4d4bd5e Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #17204: wallet: Do not turn OP_1NEGATE in scriptSig into 0x0181 in s...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master e629d07 Pieter Wuille: Do not turn OP_1NEGATE in scriptSig into 0x0181 in signing code
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17204 | wallet: Do not turn OP_1NEGATE in scriptSig into 0x0181 in signing code (sipa) by meshcollider · Pull Request #17204 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< michaelfolkson>
It seems to me that the experiment has been very short. I will try to find out if there is genuine interest in contributing, reviewing on that Bitcoin Design Slack
< wumpus>
luke-jr_: that seems another issue, would make it imopssible to move bitcoin itself there
< luke-jr_>
also, while it used to be possible to have multiple forks under the same org (so bitcoin-core/gui and bitcoin-core/foobar), GitHub seems to have removed that possibility too
< wumpus>
then again if a lot of people feel like it would be easier if it's a bitcoin/bitcoin fork we could try asking github
< jnewbery>
if we delete bitcoin-core/gui and then recreate it as a fork of bitcoin/bitcoin, you'd be able to
< jnewbery>
wumpus: if you push a branch to <developer>/bitcoin , then you can't open a PR against bitcoin-core/gui because they don't share a common fork in gitub
< wumpus>
he wants to inherit it from bitcoin/bitcoin I think instead of having it as completely disparate repo
< luke-jr_>
Can we recreate bitcoin-core/gui so GitHub will let us do PRs from the same <user>/bitcoin forks instead of making a new remote for everyone?
< wumpus>
#topic Can we recreate bitcoin-core/gui (Luke-jr)
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11082 | Add new bitcoin_rw.conf file that is used for settings modified by this software itself by luke-jr · Pull Request #11082 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #19710: bench: Prevent thread oversubscription and decreases the variance of result values (master...200813-var) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19710
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #19070: p2p: Signal support for compact block filters with NODE_COMPACT_FILTERS (master...2020-05-node-compact-filters) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19070
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master f5c003d Jim Posen: [test] Add test for NODE_COMPACT_FILTER.
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 132b30d Jim Posen: [net] Signal NODE_COMPACT_FILTERS if we're serving compact filters.
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master b3fbc94 John Newbery: Apply cfilters review fixups