< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #18402: gui: display mapped AS in peers info window (master...gui-peers-display-mapped_as) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18402
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #18397: build: Fix libevent linking for bench_bitcoin binary (master...20200321-libevent) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18397
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] theStack opened pull request #18396: rpc: add missing HelpExampleRpc for getblockfilter (master...20200321-rpc-add-missing-rpcexample-for-getblockfilter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18396
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18395: scripts: add PE dylib checking to symbol-check.py (master...pe_dll_checking) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18395
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] brakmic closed pull request #18394: test: added test for JSONRPC-objects (master...expanding-rpc-test-coverage) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18394
2020-03-20
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] brakmic opened pull request #18394: test: added test for JSONRPC-objects (master...expanding-rpc-test-coverage) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18394
< emilengler>
I think this question is probably a bit misplaced here. However maybe #7692 helps you. It was the PR when Bitcoin Core removed the alert system. AFAIK the alert field is still in the protocol but I'm not sure on this.
< dmos>
Why is Bitcoin Core sending an alert message? Is it really a breach of BTC protocol?
< dmos>
To be clear, client is bitcoinj and bitcoin core is the node being connected to.
< dmos>
Greetings from Bisq! Experiencing weird interaction between our (outdated) fork of BitcoinJ and Bitcoin Core 0.19.0.1. This log entry sums it up: `o.b.core.PeerSocketHandler: [127.0.0.1]:18444 - org.bitcoinj.core.ProtocolException: Received AlertMessage before version handshake is complete.`
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] glowang opened pull request #18391: doc: Update init and reduce-traffic docs for -blocksonly (master...update_blocksonly_docs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18391
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18386: doc: Temporary note that release notes should be edited in wiki (master...2020_03_relnot) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18386
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 5bf45fe MarcoFalke: Merge #18386: doc: Temporary note that release notes should be edited in w...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master b492684 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Temporary note that release notes should be edited in wiki
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #18386: doc: Temporary note that release notes should be edited in wiki (master...2020_03_relnot) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18386
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] gzhao408 opened pull request #18384: [test] more specific feature_segwit test error message (master...segwit-test-errormsg) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18384
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18383 | Check for overflow when calculating sum of outputs in a transaction by elichai · Pull Request #18383 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #18340: doc: mention MAKE=gmake workaround when building on a BSD (master...fixup_18129) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18340
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 527c398 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #18340: doc: mention MAKE=gmake workaround when building on a BSD
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 84a46a9 emu: doc: mention MAKE=gmake workaround when building on a BSD
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] elichai opened pull request #18383: Check for overflow when calculating sum of outputs in a transaction (master...2020-03-value-overflow) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18383
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] vasild opened pull request #18382: doc: note the costs of fetching all pull requests (master...note_fetch_all_cost) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18382
< sipa>
or create a new bitcoin-fork-old branch, and swap with it
< fanquake>
wumpus could you swap the default branch for the bitcoin-core/leveldb repo from "bitcoin-fork" to "bitcoin-fork-new" ?
2020-03-18
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift closed pull request #18308: depends: Make it possible to build Boost dependency using a clang toolset (./b2 toolset=clang) (master...b2-toolset-clang) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18308
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #18380: doc: Remove html comment in PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE (master...2003-docGitHubTemplateNoComment) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18380
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18300: fuzz: Add option to merge input dir to test runner (master...Mf1902-fuzzMerge) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18300
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18371: test: use fs namespace in dbwrapper unicodepath test (master...dbwrapper_use_fs_namespace) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18371
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18364: random: remove getentropy() fallback for macOS < 10.12 (master...macos_remove_1012_fallback) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18364
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #18363: tests: Add fuzzing harness for HTTPRequest, libevent's evhttp and related functions (master...fuzzers-http_request) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18363
2020-03-16
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18350: test: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new block has the correct hash internally (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18350
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 7060d2d MarcoFalke: Merge #18350: test: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new bl...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 7a6627a Samer Afach: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new block has the
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #18346: rpc: Document an RPCResult for all calls; Enforce at compile time (master...2003-docAllRpcRes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18346
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 25424cf Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #18346: rpc: Document an RPCResult for all calls; Enforce at compile...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fac5225 MarcoFalke: rpc: Document an RPCResult for all calls; Enforce at compile time
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #18360: Bump transifex slug and update English translations for 0.20 (master...2020_03_translations_020x) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18360
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] TheQuantumPhysicist opened pull request #18350: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new block has the correct hash internally (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18350
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #18349: build: Fix quick hack for version string in releases (master...20200314-version-workaround) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18349
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17681 | wallet: Keep inactive seeds after sethdseed and derive keys from them as needed by achow101 · Pull Request #17681 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #18346: rpc: Document an RPCResult for all calls; Enforce at compile time (master...2003-docAllRpcRes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18346
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18340: doc: mention MAKE=gmake workaround when building on a BSD (master...fixup_18129) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18340
< sipa>
if 6 MB is a problem, you probably shouldn't be running bitcoin core
< ysangkok>
luke-jr: bitcoin doesn't use "all of Qt". for example, my libqt5core is only 6 MB. and given that the default desktop isn't qt-based, qt may be loaded solely for bitcoin in case it is dynamically linked
< luke-jr>
and changing bitcoin/bitcoin to a notice of some sort explaining the upgrade paths
< wumpus>
yes +1 with adding a notice to bitcoin/bitcoin at least, no matter if there's any new PPAs
< luke-jr>
would be nice if we could come to some agreement here to present to BlueMatt.. maybe "two new PPAs, and bump bitcoin/bitcoin with a notice"?
< luke-jr>
MarcoFalke: I don't know how BlueMatt setup the Launchpad stuff - I suspect the account is his personal account, and ~bitcoin is just a team with only him
< luke-jr>
achow101: currently only BlueMatt has a monopoly on the 'bitcoin' name
< achow101>
I think we have to keep bitcoin/bitcoin just to keep existing docs working and not confusing existing users further
< luke-jr>
back to the original topic though, bitcoin/bitcoin seems like a bad URI IMO
< luke-jr>
hebasto: 2019-09, there were still around 8000 users of the PPA at bitcoin/bitcoin