< June 2026 >
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1234567 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
2026-05-28
<darosior>
If it's a win for the Kernel library, and Bitcoin Core is no worse off, that seems fine?
<sedited>
not sure how interested people are in this split in the first place. The code-organizational benefits are kind of nice, but beyond that the utility for the Bitcoin Core software are a bit questionable.
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] rkrux opened pull request #35404: wallet: allow anti-fee-sniping in sendall RPC while not relying of RBF default (master...antifeesniping) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35404
<bitcoin-git>
[leveldb-subtree] fanquake merged pull request #52: Revert "Increase maximum read-only mmap()s used from 1000 to 4096 on 64-bit systems" (bitcoin-fork...2025-05-revert-mmap-increase) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb-subtree/pull/52
<bitcoin-git>
leveldb-subtree/bitcoin-fork fd8f696 laanwj: Revert "Increase maximum read-only mmap()s used from 1000 to 4096 on 64-bi...
<nkaretnikov>
speaking of nix, can we reach some decision here? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35375 i feel like i responded to a lot of concerns, made compromises, and i honestly don’t understand what the big deal is with getting this merged. there’s more discussion on that PR compared to the text in the PR itself. right now it sits at 1 ack and 1 nack and people are also discussing what to do with installation docs in
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #35395: doc: Improve test suite dependencies documentation (master...260527-ft-needed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35395
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] willcl-ark opened pull request #35394: test: remove unnecessary rpc calls from feature_dbcrash (master...faster-dbcrash) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35394
<dergoegge>
There are people (e.g. me) that spend a lot of their time on fuzzing. There is an irc channel (#bitcoin-core-fuzzing) for the fuzzing working group, although that chat is pretty quiet
<dergoegge>
Hi Nikita! We have ~250 harnesses in the main repo (bitcoin/bitcoin), there's fuzzamoto, and there's also https://github.com/bitcoinfuzz/bitcoinfuzz. All of these are fuzzing 24/7. The harnesses in the main repo get fuzzed on oss-fuzz and also on machines of various contributors.
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Sjors opened pull request #35392: test: add v31.0 and basic IPC backward compatibility check (master...2026/05/backward-v31-ipc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35392
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] maflcko closed pull request #34839: doc: remove unshipped doc references from help and warning text (master...doc/unshipped-doc-links-helptext) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34839
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] maflcko opened pull request #35391: test: Use operator for time_points instead of manual TickSinceEpoch (master...2605-test-iwyu-op-less-less) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35391
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Sjors closed pull request #34970: init: add -test=pause_load_mempool, test mempool save before loaded (master...2026/03/pause-mempool-load) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34970
<ekzyis>
how much interest is there still in adding honggfuzz: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/issues/267? the ticket is 2 years old, and I'm thinking, "maybe it's more important to review fuzzing PRs?"
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] optout21 reopened pull request #35229: refactor: Use CBlockIndex parameters as reference (master...2605-block-param-ref) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35229
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] optout21 closed pull request #35229: refactor: Use CBlockIndex parameters as reference (master...2605-block-param-ref) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35229
<eugenesiegel>
Uh I might be misunderstanding your question, but this interface would just allow mocking any calls to chainman. _aj_ mentioned a PeerManChainPoolInterface here (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27502#issuecomment-1681492139) and it's pretty much that. I had claude prototype the interface and use it instead of a TestingSetup in a fuzz
<bitcoin-git>
[gui] johnny9 closed pull request #933: [DRAFT] Introduce Qt test automation bridge and gui functional tests (master...qt-test-bridge) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/933
<abubakarsadiq>
dergoegge: 2140-dev/bitcoin is a fork of bitcoin-core where we at the 2140 team will marinate bigger, more intrusive ideas and have an e2e implementation that is well-tested and running in production. The plan is to take a move-fast-break-things approach and have most edge cases and ideas more thoroughly thought through before proposing to port them upstream to bitcoin/bitcoin.
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #35377: wallet: Allow importing of descriptors without private keys when the wallet has the private keys (master...importdescriptors-without-priv) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35377
<bitcoin-git>
[gui-qml] johnny9 closed pull request #697: Have -disablewallet remove all walletmodels and validate node-only mode with a functional test (qt6...issue-691-disablewallet) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/pull/697
<bitcoin-git>
[gui-qml] johnny9 opened pull request #724: Node startup and runtime feedback (Errors/Warnings) (qt6...qml-node-runtime-feedback) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/pull/724
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] HusseinAdeiza opened pull request #35364: doc: Fix command in build-unix.md example (master...fix-typo-build-unix-docs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35364
<corebot>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/35321 | p2p: Misbehave on invalid compact block in optimistic reconstruction by ViniciusCestarii · Pull Request #35321 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] brunoerg opened pull request #35358: external signer: verify PSBT is reliable after signing it (master...2026-04-external-signer) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35358
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] ajtowns opened pull request #35355: Use atomics for determining whether trace logging is enabled (master...202512-log-atomic) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35355
2026-05-21
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] randomlogin opened pull request #35354: net: wait for validation queue flush for missing compact filter for an already known block (master...p2p-cbf-wait-for-indexed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35354
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sedited merged pull request #35017: mempool: remove all subsequent tx in pkg on failure (master...2026-04-remove_all_consensusscript) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35017
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master a56b4ea merge-script: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35017: mempool: remove all subsequent tx in pkg on f...
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master ac9aa71 Greg Sanders: mempool: remove all subsequent tx in pkg on failure
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sedited closed pull request #35352: wallet: Replace assert(false) with CHECK_NONFATAL(false) in EncryptWallet (master...fix/encryptwallet-assert-replacement) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35352
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] TianYuBaBg opened pull request #35352: wallet: Replace assert(false) with CHECK_NONFATAL(false) in EncryptWallet (master...fix/encryptwallet-assert-replacement) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35352
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hodlinator opened pull request #35351: net: Disallow invalid HeadersSyncState due to lagging clock (master...pr/35208_alt) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35351
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #35350: test: suppress ECONNABORTED in wait_for_rpc_connection on Windows (master...pr/connabort) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35350
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 merged pull request #35316: musig: Reject empty pubkey list in GetMuSig2KeyAggCache (master...reject-empty-pubkey-list) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35316
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 8ce8432 nervana21: musig: Reject empty pubkey list in GetMuSig2KeyAggCache
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 0553ce5 Ava Chow: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#35316: musig: Reject empty pubkey list in GetMuSig2K...
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] dxbjavid opened pull request #35347: dbwrapper: use RAII for Logv heap buffer and handle vsnprintf failure (master...dbwrapper-logv-raii-cleanup) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35347
<Murch[m]>
The CI workers seem to be very slow for the BIPs repository this morning. I assume that this also applies to the Bitcoin Core PRs. Anyone know what’s going on there?
<corebot>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/35182 | Replace libevent with our own HTTP and socket-handling implementation by pinheadmz · Pull Request #35182 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<johnny9dev>
Sorry I have to get going. Here is my qml update. https://github.com/orgs/bitcoin-core/projects/1/views/3 is updated. We're making steady progress and still on track to have the project in a state where we feel it is worthwhile to start getting feedback from a wider group in the middle/end of June.
<theStack>
The libsecp SP module PR https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1765 got some momentum and fresh reviewer eyes after coredev (thanks!). In core, Novo__ opened #35301 and #35302 now (second takes of previously #28122 and #28201, respectively) based on that. Review would be much appreciated.
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] HowHsu closed pull request #32791: checkqueue: implement a new scriptcheck worker pool with atomic variables (master...checkqueue_atomic) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32791
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #33841: cmake: Switch to `minisketch` upstream build system (master...251110-minisketch) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33841