< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] 251Labs opened pull request #12050: Implements a virtual destructor on the BaseRequestHandler class. (master...patch/BaseRequestHandler-virtual-dtor) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12050
< bayatloo>
can i develop Bitcoin with c#
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] martinus opened pull request #12048: Use best-fit strategy in Arena, now O(log(n)) instead O(n) (master...faster_arena) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12048
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jeromer opened pull request #12042: Add hdenabled flag in getwalletinfo (master...getwalletinfo/hdenabledflag) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12042
< jonasschnelli>
meshcollider: heh.. yeah... but I'm happy if "Bitcoin Foundation" is gone in 0.16.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Zelest opened pull request #12041: doc: Rewrite the OpenBSD build instructions (master...openbsd-build-revamp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12041
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] lionello opened pull request #12040: fix: add support for CORS headers and pre-flight request (master...http-options-pre-flight) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12040
< karanlearns>
luke-jr: i cannot join bitcoin channel, i get switched to bitcoin-unregistered although i have registered. this question is in continuation of my discussion from yesterday do - please accomodate.
< luke-jr>
karanlearns: user questions in #bitcoin
< karanlearns>
arubi: on running make where is the bitcoin-qt so file made ? is it in /usr/bin or the one in src folder ?
< karanlearns>
when i run make - where is the so file bitcoin-qt generated . is it the one in /usr/bin or the one in src folder
2017-12-27
< gmaxwell>
cluelessperson: and which are unrelated to bitcoin core in any case. (they cause a desire for _import_ which we support, not export)
< cluelessperson>
gmaxwell: Currently, the only method that seems reliable for exporting private keys, is to get the bitcoin core binary, start it, and use the console to dumpwallet.
< cluelessperson>
sipa: I'm suggesting a framework to make life easier for users using bitcoin. Extracting and dealing with keys at this point is inevitable and currently painful. All those things you mentioned fit into this framework.
< cluelessperson>
outside of through bitcoin core itself
< zelest>
i dunno, i might lack the understanding of the bitcoin protocol, but having a whole database because a few single corner cases has to scale feels a bit bloated tbh :o
< provoostenator>
So does lnd I believe, although they currently don't support bitcoin core yet.
< helpplx>
its a issue of the wallet, it didint warn me. i selected "low fee, 24 hours", it created a transaction that the network doesnt accept. is not my fault, at least add a warning. where to ask? #bitcoin is sandboxed nobody replies its a joke
< rafalcpp>
helpplx: this channel is only about C++/etc developers who code bitcoin core client. Ask in #bitcoin. And as others say, you can NOT lose your money by sending it with too low fee.
< rabidus>
calm down. official channel is #bitcoin
< alf1>
okay, i try: i have transfer btcs from bitpanda.com to my bitcoin core wallet (0.15.1). (transaction ID 41354056bfe77f201d1aa098b2a2b34505aa9d4812935c44cf66a417abcde3ed). but i cant working with btc, because its still pending. i still waiting for "availible". i try -rescan, but it isnt working. can anybody help?
< helpplx>
thanks but its really a "yes" or "no" question, the devs here know this..i used bitcoin-core wallet, set the fee to low (24 hours) and this mess happend. balance is deducted but tx not broadcated. do i need to restart btc core to get those 25 btc (390k $) back into the sender wallet? thanks for the work.
< jb55>
helpplx alf1: try asking on bitcoin.stackexchange.com
< helpplx>
im sorry too for asking a support question but its a 25 btc transaction. sendrawtransaction fails, i dont understand if the btc are still in my wallet if i restart the bitcoin core wallet..only this..thanks guys
< helpplx>
" Error sending transaction: insufficient priority and fee for relay. " blockcypher push tx shows, and blockchain pushtx shows Validation Error: Insufficient fee. Please try again with a higher fee... bitcoin console showsTX decode failed (code -22) when broadcasting with sendrawtx
< helpplx>
hi, i tried to send a tx from bitcoin core with too low fee it seems, it shows as 0/not broadcasted yet. trying to use pushtx services shows the fee is too low. it deducted the balance from the bitcoin-core wallet.. what should i do? restart the wallet? if so will the funds return there? thatnks, sorry
< rafalcpp>
sipa: no, released (Gitian) binary dynamically links libc, also librt, libgcc, libpthread, (and ld), and libm in bitcoind but not in -cli. (ldd bitcoin-cli shows)
< contrapumpkin>
I don't think it's all that different for bitcoin, unless you're concerned about someone injecting malicious code by swapping out a dynamically linked dependency. But if they're futzing with executable code on your computer, you're probably screwed anyway (they could do LD_PRELOAD, poke around in memory, and various other shenanigans to mess with your running node)
< rafalcpp>
contrapumpkin: I'm generally learning how Bitcoin chooses to use static vs dynamic linking and why so
< rafalcpp>
why Bitcoin chooses to link libc dynamically? any pros/cons?
< karanlearns>
copied to offline computer and bitcoin-qt gives error
< karanlearns>
and then copied the bitcoin-qt file from src folder first, then tried with bitcoin-qt under bin folder
< karanlearns>
now when i cloned from github,added one commit , make, install and then copied bitcoin-qt file from bin on offline computer - i got error
< karanlearns>
earlier - i had copied bitcoin-qt from bin/ of the release 0.15.1 on my offline computer and it worked fine.
< rafalcpp>
karanlearns: move this question to #bitcoin imo. How ever the problem seems to be that you do not have lib boost system installed (system wide) on the target offline computer
< karanlearns>
i get this error when i try to run latest source bitcoin-qt from offline computer
< karanlearns>
i then copied the bitcoin-qt file from bin folder to my other offline computer.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] honzik666 opened pull request #12007: [Doc] Clarify the meaning of fee delta not being a fee rate in prioritisetransaction RPC (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12007
< pwnagetool>
the original bitcoin idea was to be able to get rid of poverty, share easily and give everyone a chance in life and now it's turning into a big ass energy wasting infinitely complex hash solving greed machine doing the exact opposite, make bitcoin great again yo' life is about having fun together
< meshcollider>
pwnagetool: move to #bitcoin channel, not here...
< pwnagetool>
we have food growing on trees, there is no logic in having a debt based economy while people are starving really. simply share and care easy business, this has to do with bitcoin too
< meshcollider>
pwnagetool: you're off topic for this channel, please take this discussion to #bitcoin
< pwnagetool>
i do it with a bot on not only bitcoin, but all cryptocurrencies including the ones with instant transfer no fees
< meshcollider>
pwnagetool: bitcoin core is fully open source, feel free to start contributing to help improve it :)
< pwnagetool>
bitcoin as an idea is the original and thus the best, don't let other shitcoins lead the way
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jeffrade opened pull request #12001: [RPC] Adding ::minRelayTxFee amount to getmempoolinfo and updating help (master...update_mempoolminfee_help_details) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12001
< aj>
meshcollider: you need to do ./bitcoin-qt -help-debug and then click on Help/Command Line Options to see the results of utilitydialog.cpp
< meshcollider>
aj: qt/bitcoin.cpp calls RegisterAllArgs and utilitydialog.cpp imports init.h though? I tested it on ./bitcoin-qt -help-debug -? and it seems to work
< sufi>
hi could any one help me ... how do I create a blockchain after forking a bitcoin
< wumpus>
it would add another bitcoin.conf, bitcoin_rw.conf, which can be written by the software itself
< provoostenator>
Ah, so we don't have this "here's a setting, but if you use -blah it's overridden, unless you also have bitcoin.conf, unless you have another one" stuff?
< provoostenator>
I'm still reluctant about enabling RBF for RPC. Without having a long disucssion here, is there a list of known large services that use Bitcoin Core RPC to broadcast transactions? I'd like to know their take on this.
< provoostenator>
In theory you could feed the client any sha256 hash from any source and it couuld figure out how much went into it. So you can feed it headers from anything that's completely different from Bitcoin, as long as it has a trustworthy timestamp, and it only cares aobut estimating total work in the world.
< luke-jr>
jonasschnelli: but for example, if 50% of miners switch to BCH, we wouldn't want to false flag this as a security problem in Bitcoin
< arubi>
goatpig, alright, but I don't think I understand the usefulness if it's targeted at bitcoin specifically
< goatpig>
arubi: im not saying that, this is based on Bitcoin, i dont care about other networks/chains
< luke-jr>
goatpig: that contradicts the "undiscrimnately" part.. invalid blocks aren't Bitcoin
< webuser8434>
The only label there is is Bitcoin. Maybe use a section of bitcoin.org to communicate development .. whatever, details are not import. Core needs to die for Bitcoin to live!
< webuser8434>
Hey I just wanted to say that I think maybe at some point in the future you guys might want to consider dissolution of the "Core" brand thing. As much I support everything you do and how you do it the whole "Core" idea is Bad and you'll never stop paying price for it and by extension the entire Bitcoin community. It's divisive in its nature and it gives opponents a tangible target. Unless of course it goes away. It was
< goatpig>
luke-jr: this is targetted at Bitcoin, i dont do alts
< luke-jr>
goatpig: so that assumes the blockchains in question are minimally compatible with Bitcoin in some way?
< jonasschnelli>
what is a lite bitcoin node?
< goatpig>
thinking of a hybrid mode where clients bootstrap on a public supernode then run off of a lite bitcoin node
< SomeBuggyCode>
I just wanted to ask and see if there might be anywhere to start besides reading the bitcoin docs. Is there any good way to start contributing? Thank you
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #11966: clientversion: Use full commit hash for commit-based version descriptions (master...ver_full_commit_hash) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11966
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #11965: qa: Note on test order in test_runner (master...Mf1712-qaTestRunnerOrder) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11965
< MarcoFalke>
jonasschnelli: Think of the tests as a layer around bitcoin-core, not the other way round ;)
< maaku>
I've moved some discussion regarding implementation of BIPs 98, 116, and 117 to #bitcoin-mast
< provoostenator>
Right, but how does script prevent Bitcoin Core nodes from bootstrapping with a BCash peer and then getting stuck in August 2017 if none of those peers know of any Bitcoin Core peers? Not sure what the odds of that are.
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 88411e9 MarcoFalke: Squashed 'src/univalue/' changes from fe805ea74f..07947ff2da...
< wumpus>
make builds the binaries in the build directory, which is where you invoke make. This will be src/bitcoin, src/qt/bitcoin-qt, src/test/test_bitcoin etc
< fanquake>
wumpus does everyone inside the bitcoin org have 2FA turned on?
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11359 | Add a pruning high water mark to reduce the frequency of pruning events by esotericnonsense · Pull Request #11359 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #11958: Update README.md to let people know about (((Bilderberg))) and HIGH FEES! (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11958
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fockkboy opened pull request #11958: Update README.md to let people know about (((Bilderberg))) and HIGH FEES! (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11958
< meshcollider>
bob___: try #bitcoin channel, this one is not for support
< bob___>
having an issue with bitcoin core changing the transaction fee to a lower amount?
< echeveria>
not really. at the moment there's a load of suboptimal ways of getting work updates from Bitcoin Core, adding a GBT endpoint means you don't need to poll or do any roundtrips to RPC.
< DrBenway>
is bitcoin core going ahead with segwit? there's been so much back and forth that im not sure anymore
< sipa>
DrBenway: i'm currently working on segwit wallet support in bitcoin core, reviewing many other changes, and longer term i'm working on a signature aggregation proposal and a few further out cryptographic constructions