< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa07898 MarcoFalke: test: Properly log named args in authproxy
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master f3ecf30 MarcoFalke: Merge #15772: test: Properly log named args in authproxy
< tryphe>
luke-jr, i see, that makes sense. but i got the knack that bitcoin devs earned come income from donations somehow or some sort of community funding. not so?
< luke-jr>
tryphe: Bitcoin Core is an open source project many different people contribute to; there's no centralised entity accepting/distributing donations on everyone's behalf
< tryphe>
luke-jr, so where are the real bitcoin core donation addresses?
< luke-jr>
tryphe: either way, it's bitcoin.org you want to report any issues to
< luke-jr>
tryphe: that one is to support bitcoin.org, again not related to Bitcoin Core
< luke-jr>
tryphe: eh, the link doesn't say it's to donate to Bitcoin or Bitcoin Core
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MeshCollider merged pull request #15749: Fix: importmulti only imports origin info for PKH outputs (master...201904_importallorigins) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15749
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #15751: Speed up deriveaddresses for large ranges (master...201904_fasterderiveaddresses) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15751
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #15750: [rpc] Remove the addresses field from the getaddressinfo return object (master...2019_04_remove_address_from_getaddressinfo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15750
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #15749: Fix: importmulti only imports origin info for PKH outputs (master...201904_importallorigins) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15749
< achow101>
supay: can you try `bitcoin-cli listaddressgroupings` and see if your address is in there?
< gwillen>
if you are trying to import the master privkey, that is your problem -- bitcoin core does not know about bip 44, and won't try to derive the child keys automatically
< supay>
gmaxwell: i've done: bitcoin-cli importprivkey the_key "" true -- and i wait about 25 mins or so for the rescan, and when i run bitcoin-cli getwalletinfo, the balances are still 0
< supay>
i lost access to my bitcoin and scrubbed my system for any data i could find. found some bip32/44 paths. trying to import private keys into bitcoin core using importprivkey, but that isn't working. there aren't any errors either. any help?
< gmaxwell>
jl2012: there isn't a chinese version of bitcoin.org or something that only shows old links? I'm just at a loss as to what would be causing people to start new nodes using old code.
< wumpus>
fanquake: thanks for keeping an eye on changes to the release notes-if this keeps up we'll have to restrict edits to people in the bitcoin-core org (I'd prefer not to as this loses some potential documentation-only contributors), but this may well be accidental and they fixed it
< gmaxwell>
$ ./bitcoin-cli getblocktemplate
< gmaxwell>
I'm just ./bitcoin-cli getblocktemplate '{"rules": ["segwit"]}' | jq '.transactions | .[] | select(.hash != .txid)' |less and hitting / and pasting in the txid.
< gmaxwell>
I did: $ ./bitcoin-cli prioritisetransaction 35611cbad11967731aa122136bf90bd63c5224296c45c10a26885c3bb3fff6f6 0 100000
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #15721: validation: Check absence of locks at compile-time (LOCKS_EXCLUDED) in addition to the current run-time checking (AssertLockNotHeld) (master...negative-locking-annotations) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15721
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] scravy closed pull request #15715: Better support for mainframes and EBCDIC users in general (master...cater-mainframes-and-ebcdic-users) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15715
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] scravy opened pull request #15715: Better support for mainframes and EBCDIC users in general (master...cater-mainframes-and-ebcdic-users) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15715
< wumpus>
(there's nothing wrong with asking that question on twitter on your own personal accord, but having it come from "bitcoin core" is going to cause lots of noise)
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #15704: Move Win32 defines to configure.ac to ensure they are globally defined (master...win32_defines_globally) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15704
< sipa>
yeah, so your bitcoin core wallet will correspond to a union of several things that are (possibly) compatible with an electrum wallet individually