[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10631: Use the override specifier (C++11) where we expect to be overriding the virtual function of a base class (master...overrides-ii) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10631
also if anyone is feeling generous, I'm trying allow 'chainActive' to be used in the interpreter, but I am having trouble figuring out how to exactly allow that to be reachable without bitcoin-tx failing to compile
and then you can use bitcoin-cli to run commands, this is more on topic for #bitcoin not bitcoin-core-dev
luke-jr: good idea. Though my bitcoin.it account looks authentic and it's public available that I am a co-founder of DigitalBitbox... though a tweet or pgp signed pastebin is a good idea.. will do
wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr btcdrak sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier jl2012 instagibbs achow101 : Sorry to ping you all, but since some dev are in Tokyo around end of july for some conferences, I thought it can be a good idea to have such occasion to have 1 or 2 days of pure bitcoin core
Thanks instagibbs. I'm just spinning up to speed with git. I made a deterministic vm description and a Ubuntu preseed file de novo and am now making a local git repository, then spinning up the deterministic bitcoin build. Lots of coffee and new thought patterns.
[bitcoin] practicalswift closed pull request #10597: scripted-diff: Make use of the improved handling of two consecutive right angle brackets in C++11 (master...right-angle-brackets) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10597
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10597: scripted-diff: Make use of C++11:s improved handling of two consecutive right angle brackets (master...right-angle-brackets) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10597
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #10595: Bugfix: RPC/Mining: Use pre-segwit sigops and limits, when working with non-segwit GBT clients (master...gbt_nosegwit_fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10595
txpending, rather than continue arguing, please move it to #bitcoin. If the answers aren't satisfying, the place to go next is github repo and file an issue
txpending, #bitcoin please, people will help
murchandamus: thanks for the pointers! However, I haven't found a way in the bitcoin core QT gui to "Send all your bitcoins from the addresses recorded in step 1 to a new address with the recommended or higher than recommended fee."
Hi I am using bitcoin core and accidentally only added 0.00000798 BTC as fee. Will this tx be processed by the miners? How can I either stop that transaction or add a fee? Are there other options?
unlike the other things there where views of most people are much too nuanced to categorized, segwit2x is a laughable affront to bitcoin's utility and the technical decisions they're making seem to be entirely based on deliberately ignoring people who tried to give them advice and a deep lack of understanding of the system they're changing