< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10251 | Add balances cache / GUI: use a signal instead of a poll thread by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #10251 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< TD-Linux>
by the way, the top Google results for "bitcoin transaction stuck" involve multi-step processes using web wallets that are much worse than overpaying
< TD-Linux>
phantomcircuit, is there fee bumping support in bitcoin core now?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #10583: [RPC] Split part of validateaddress into getaddressinfo (master...getaddressinfo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10583
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #10582: Pass in smart fee slider value to coin control dialog (master...fixcoincontrolfee) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10582
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10549: Avoid printing generic and duplicated "checking for QT" during ./configure (master...check_qt) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10549
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master ad1a13e Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10549: Avoid printing generic and duplicated "checking for QT" during ./configure...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 7222388 Timothy Redaelli: Avoid printing generic and duplicated "checking for QT" during ./configure...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 23fb9ad Luke Dashjr: wallet: Move nAccountingEntryNumber from static/global to CWallet
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 9d15d55 Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: wallet: Increment "update counter" when modifying account stuff
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master f28eb80 Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: wallet: Increment "update counter" only after actually making the applicable db changes to avoid potential races...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10488: Note that the prioritizetransaction dummy value is deprecated, and has no meaning (master...2017-05-dummy-api) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10488
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa1f106 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10488: Note that the prioritizetransaction dummy value is deprecated, and has no meaning...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 40796e1 Matt Corallo: Remove references to priority that snuck back in in 870824e9....
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] NicolasDorier closed pull request #10007: [QT] Remove SendToSelf, and break down its payouts (master...watchonlylabel2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10007
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] NicolasDorier closed pull request #9985: [QT] Show more descriptive label for pay to yourself entries (master...watchonlylabel) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9985
2017-06-11
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] gmaxwell opened pull request #10577: Add an explanation of quickly hashing onto a non-power of two range. (master...hashrange-comment) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10577
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10574: Remove includes in .cpp files for things the corresponding .h file already included (master...redundant) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10574
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10573: Remove unnecessary includes (master...remove-unneccessary-includes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10573
< instagibbs>
txpending, rather than continue arguing, please move it to #bitcoin. If the answers aren't satisfying, the place to go next is github repo and file an issue
< instagibbs>
txpending, #bitcoin please, people will help
< txpending>
murchandamus: thanks for the pointers! However, I haven't found a way in the bitcoin core QT gui to "Send all your bitcoins from the addresses recorded in step 1 to a new address with the recommended or higher than recommended fee."
< murchandamus>
txpending: You're in the wrong channel, this channel is about Bitcoin Core development. You might want to ask in #bitcoin. Meanwhile this might answer your questionhttps://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/41972/5406
< txpending>
Hi I am using bitcoin core and accidentally only added 0.00000798 BTC as fee. Will this tx be processed by the miners? How can I either stop that transaction or add a fee? Are there other options?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10566: [docs] Use the "domain name setup" image (previously unused) in the gitian docs (master...unreferenced-file) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10566
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 5d034ee Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10566: [docs] Use the "domain name setup" image (previously unused) in the gitian docs...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 7631066 practicalswift: Use the "domain name setup" image (previously unused) in the gitian docs
< BlueMatt>
unlike the other things there where views of most people are much too nuanced to categorized, segwit2x is a laughable affront to bitcoin's utility and the technical decisions they're making seem to be entirely based on deliberately ignoring people who tried to give them advice and a deep lack of understanding of the system they're changing
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #10571: [RPC]Move transaction combining from signrawtransaction to new RPC (master...combineraw-rpc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10571
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10566: Use the "domain name setup" image (previously unused) in the gitian docs (master...unreferenced-file) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10566
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #10565: [coverage] Remove leveldb, univalue, and benchmarks from coverage report (master...lcov-remove-extra) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10565
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #10559: Change semantics of HaveCoinInCache to match HaveCoin (master...haveunspentincache) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10559
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8498 | Optimization: Minimize the number of times it is checked that no money... by jtimon · Pull Request #8498 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sdaftuar reopened pull request #10357: Allow setting nMinimumChainWork on command line (master...2017-05-chainwork-commandline) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10357
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10545: Use list initialization (C++11) for maps/vectors instead of boost::assign::map_list_of/list_of (master...list_of) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10545
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 29f80cd Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10545: Use list initialization (C++11) for maps/vectors instead of boost::assign::map_list_of/list_of...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 3fb81a8 practicalswift: Use list initialization (C++11) for maps/vectors instead of boost::assign::map_list_of/list_of
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #10557: Make check to distinguish between orphan txs and old txs more efficient. (master...dontcheckoutputs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10557
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #10556: Move stop/start functions from utils.py into BitcoinTestFramework (master...testframeworkstopstart) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10556
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #10555: [tests] various improvements to zmq_test.py (master...zmqtestimprovements) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10555
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10548: Use std::unordered_{map,set} (C++11) instead of boost::unordered_{map,set} (master...unordered_map) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10548
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 35e7f13 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10548: Use std::unordered_{map,set} (C++11) instead of boost::unordered_{map,set}...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 246a02f practicalswift: Use std::unordered_{map,set} (C++11) instead of boost::unordered_{map,set}
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10547: [tests] Use FastRandomContext instead of boost::random::{mt19937,uniform_int_distribution} (master...remove-boost-random-dependency) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10547
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 71ab6e5 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10547: [tests] Use FastRandomContext instead of boost::random::{mt19937,uniform_int_distribution}...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 227ae9b practicalswift: [tests] Use FastRandomContext instead of boost::random::{mt19937,uniform_int_distribution}
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10553: Simplify "bool x = y ? true : false". Remove unused function and trailing semicolon. (master...minor-cleanups) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10553
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10477 | Use C++ initializer to initialze map and implement map comparator as const by cg31 · Pull Request #10477 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #10477: Use C++ initializer to initialze map and implement map comparator as const (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10477
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #10552: [Test] Tests for zmqpubrawtx and zmqpubrawblock (master...zmq-raw-tests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10552
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10279 | Add a CChainState class to validation.cpp to take another step towards clarifying internal interfaces by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #10279 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< wumpus>
bitcoin core compiles almost entirely without changes in c++17 mode, btw
< BlueMatt>
luke-jr: I absolutely do not believe it is false equivalency, actually. We're talking about what precedent is being set for Bitcoin's future and how changes are made in Bitcoin
< BlueMatt>
the idea that its a "bug" (or even an issue) for a user to *not* "upgrade" to enforce a soft fork is laughable...if that were the case, Bitcoin would pretty clearly have no long-term value
< sipa>
luke-jr: i don't "want" BIP148. I want segwit, as I think it's necessary for Bitcoin's future. BIP148 is a overly risky means of obtaining that. That does not mean I oppose it if there were tremendous support, but on itself I think it's a bad idea
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] drizzt opened pull request #10549: Avoid printing generic and duplicated "checking for QT" during ./configure (master...check_qt) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10549
< jnewbery>
no need to revert. I was just voicing surprise that it got merged without response to review comments or test cases for the new functionality in bitcoin-tx
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery closed pull request #10540: [WIP] Salvage wallet should not set the aggressive flag on Db::verify() (master...fixsalvage) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10540
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10548: Use std::unordered_{map,set} (C++11) instead of boost::unordered_{map,set} (master...unordered_map) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10548
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10547: Use std::random::mt19937/uniform_int_distribution (C++11) instead of boost::random equivalents (master...remove-boost-random-dependency) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10547
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10546: Remove unused Boost includes (master...remove-unused-boost-includes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10546
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #10523: Perform member initialization in initialization lists where possible (master...initialization-list) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10523
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master be3e042 Pieter Wuille: Merge #10523: Perform member initialization in initialization lists where possible...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 656dbd8 practicalswift: Perform member initialization in initialization lists where possible
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10545: Use list initialization (C++11) for maps/vectors instead of boost::assign::map_list_of/list_of (master...list_of) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10545
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10201: pass Consensus::Params& to functions in validation.cpp and make them static (master...consensusparams-receivedblocktransactions) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10201
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 1b708f2 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10201: pass Consensus::Params& to functions in validation.cpp and make them static...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 24980a3 Mario Dian: Make functions in validation.cpp static and pass chainparams...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #10540: Salvage wallet should not set the aggressive flag on Db::verify() (master...fixsalvage) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10540
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10539: doc: Mention update manpages in release process (master...2017_06_release_process_manpage_update) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10539
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #10539: doc: Mention update manpages in release process (master...2017_06_release_process_manpage_update) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10539
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/0.14 5e408d9 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Update manpages for 0.14.2