< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #12582: Fix ListCoins test failure due to unset g_wallet_allow_fallback_fee (master...pr/listg2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12582
< sipa>
in normal operation, bitcoin core does not look up a specific transaction, ever
< cccattt>
hi, how does a bitcoin node look up a transaction by txid, as all transactions are linked in hash tree and it seems impossible to go through all blocks? And it also seems impossible to load all transactions in memory ?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] dooglus opened pull request #12580: Show a transaction's virtual size in its details dialog (master...show_vsize) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12580
< Randolf>
those settings are configured? I think this would also be beyond the scope of what Bitcoin does.
< Randolf>
provoostenator: Consider this: Windows 10 regulatly reboots to install updates without asking the user first. Should Bitcoin's instructions tell users how to change the settings in Windows 10 to stop this from happening? And then update those instructions every time Microsoft changes the way
< Randolf>
Again, power management is, in my view, beyond the scope of what Bitcoin does.
< Randolf>
If Bitcoin were to add options to manage power settings, then that would also be adding complexity to the project which I think would generally be beyond the scope of what Bitcoin is.
< Randolf>
provoostenator: There are some hardware configurations which can "wake up" the machine when network traffic is received, but since Bitcoin has a constant flow of data even this would in effect be pointless.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10387: Eventually connect to NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED peers (master...2017/05/node_network_limited) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10387
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #12549: Make prevector::resize() and other prevector operations much faster (master...prevector) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12549
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 5aad635 Evan Klitzke: Use memset() to optimize prevector::resize()...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master e46be25 Akio Nakamura: Reduce redundant code of prevector and speed it up...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master f0e7aa7 Evan Klitzke: Add new prevector benchmarks....
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] 532479301 opened pull request #12573: Consensus: Fix bug when compiler do not support __builtin_clz* (master...vs2017) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12573
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] kostaz opened pull request #12570: Add test cases for HexStr (std::reverse_iterator and corner cases) (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12570
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #12569: Increase signal-to-noise ratio in debug.log by adjusting log level when logging failed non-manual connect():s (master...logging-signal-to-noise) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12569
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #12567: Print timestamp strings in logs using ISO 8601 formatting (master...iso-8601) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12567
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Sjors opened pull request #12565: [qt] bumpfee: offer user to reduce output for transactions without change (master...2018/02/qt-bumpfee-reduce-output) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12565
< mlz>
michagogo, oh.. no, I do have a Vista, it doesn't have enough space for bitcoin :D
< rabidus>
Am I the only one who gets their top-bar written in chinese when clicking "use previously used address" in 0.16.0 @ windows? Binaries was downloaded from bitcoin.org. AVG detected something and moved quarantine, but I granted permission. Screenshot: https://pasteboard.co/H9zSGvJ.png
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] tamasblummer opened pull request #12556: [Trivial] fix version typo in getpeerinfo RPC call help (master...fix_version_typo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12556
< wumpus>
mistakenine: not here at least, it has nothing to do with bitcoin core development
< provoostenator>
CubicEarths: I know, I prefer the GUI myself. But technical people can use bitcoin.conf, so it's the less-technical users I'm trying to help here.
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/0.16 01f931b Wladimir J. van der Laan: test: Add missing signal.h header...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] eklitzke opened pull request #12549: Make prevector::resize() and other prevector operations much faster (master...prevector) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12549
< esotericnonsense>
Randolf: the PR is tracking patch-3, https://github.com/randolf/bitcoin looks to have the single commit on top of master I think?
< esotericnonsense>
this is kind of a bitcoin question but kind of not. what's the trick to make bitcoin-qt not appear as a postage stamp on ubuntu with high dpi screens?
< Randolf>
I have extra hardware and a Windows Vista license I could throw together to see if Bitcoin works on it.
< Randolf>
There probably are people using Bitcoin on Windows 7. Windows Vista, I suspect, likely isn't used for much these days.
< michagogo>
“Bitcoin Core is extensively tested on multiple operating systems using the Linux kernel, macOS 10.8+, and Windows Vista and later.”
< tr4vis220202>
When sending a bip-70 payment, bitcoin core sent to regular address instead of p2sh, hexdump of script is 76A9142AFD057FD359FC1C180B177D05F1B4191867471A88AC
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Empact opened pull request #12545: test: Extend wait time by .1 seconds to ensure ping goes out (master...ping-timing) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12545
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #12542: Remove redundant includes. Conform to header include guidelines. (master...include-guidelines) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12542
< wumpus>
And if you want to change the bitcoin logo to a purple elephant and denominate coins in 'fluppydoodleblurz' from now on, go ahead and release a wallet that does that, use that on your sites, make a BIP, etc. By nature, bitcoin is permissionless.
< wumpus>
if you want a serious answer: some things (such as naming, branding) are too trivial to be concerned with here. There's as many opinions on it as bitcoin users. You can fork the source code today and change the name (it's a constant in configure.ac FWIW) or use luke-jr's Bitcoin Knots. If there is no agreement on changing something, the best thing is just to stick with what is there.
< booyah>
wumpus: speaking about the future, will the bitcoin wallet be returning to name "bitcoin" instead "bitcoin core"?
< esotericnonsense>
bitcoin 0.8 was not 'bitcoin core' :D
< echeveria>
booyah: let’s take this to #bitcoin please.
< wumpus>
if their point is that bitcoin core's contributors make mistakes, then they are right
< booyah>
it is also the most known security event (or 1 of like 3) used NOW to prove that bitcoin core is incompetent
< echeveria>
ie, you could create unlimited bitcoin out of thin air and spend anybodies bitcoin.
< echeveria>
satoshis bitcoin 0.1 was more vulnerable in a pile of ways. there’s lots of things that aren’t understood well.
< booyah>
I'm asking also since there're idiots in -otc claiming that is "bitcoin core fault"
< booyah>
wumpus: so all released versions of Bitcoin, including Satoshi's release, were vulneable?
< j0hnson2412>
all this work to figure out why a billion dollar payment gateway with no contact doesn't work, bitcoin is the future
< j0hnson2412>
finally got the bitcoin script extracted from the paymentdetails, but it's in some weird python mix of ascii and escaped octal..
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] kallewoof opened pull request #12537: [arith_uint256] Make it safe to use "self" in operators (master...uint-safe-self-op) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12537
< sipa>
yes, bitcoin core will prefer using the payment protocol over the raw address
< j0hnson2412>
does the bitcoin: uri scheme work ok with segwit addresses? i sent a payment with it and the actual transfer goes to a different address
< eklitzke>
so i don't quite understand what is the situation where you would get 1024 network sockets in your bitcoin process
2018-02-25
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #12055: Prepare version scheme for upcoming release [take 2] (master...Mf1712-versionDropRedundantZero) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12055
< stevenroose>
"For example, in Bitcoin Core 50KB within blocks are reserved for high priority transactions." Is this still the case?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #12534: tests: Specify skipped flake8 warnings (rather than enabled warnings) (master...lint-python-invert) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12534
< achow101>
ken2812221: that's interesting. That's the same error showing up here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12515 I think a dependency might have changed/updated which is now breaking that
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] ken2812221 opened pull request #12527: gitian-build.sh: fix signProg being recognized as two parameters (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12527
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] shigeya opened pull request #12526: Docs: Minor description fix to build procedure on Debian wrt BerkeleyDB (master...debian9-build-hint-update) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12526
< AndyS2>
if I have a CPubKey via GetPubKey() and I do a Hash(pubkey.begin(), pubkey.end()) on it I'm not getting the right hash (I'm using http://gobittest.appspot.com/Address to compare). What function should I use to hash a pubkey with SHA256, like bitcoin core does it for addresses (in the first step)?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #12486: [test] Round target fee to 8 decimals in assert_fee_amount (master...round-assert-fee-amount-target-fee) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12486
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 8c33961 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #12486: [test] Round target fee to 8 decimals in assert_fee_amount...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 42e1b5d Karl-Johan Alm: [test] Round target fee to 8 decimals in assert_fee_amount...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] khorben opened pull request #12513: Scripts and tools: Portability fix for the configure scripts generated (master...khorben/configure-portability) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12513
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Empact opened pull request #12512: Don't test against the mempool min fee information in mempool_limit.py (master...fix-min-fee-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12512
< Randolf>
I'm trying to squash my commits in Pull Request 12501 ( https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12501 ), but when I attempt to do this the "git rebase -i HEAD~1" command seems to be working on the wrong Pull Request (which was already merged a while ago).