2016-08-11

< wumpus> not seeing anything here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/milestone/20
< luke-jr> on the off-chance there's no objection, I'd like to PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/5a716a3bc6621e4d2e2c1de5b6b5596d6877d589 for 0.13.0 mostly just to make #8459 uncontroversial
< wumpus> they probably write raw transactions in their head instead of using the bitcoin core wallet
< wumpus> they're not really coupled the same way in other software than bitcoin core
< jl2012> this is a conceptual PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8499
< gmaxwell> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr btcdrak sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier
< GitHub118> [bitcoin] jl2012 opened pull request #8499: [Untested] Check bad witness (master...badwitnesscheck) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8499
< GitHub196> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8481: Qt: Fix minimize and close bugs (master...fix-minimize-and-close-bugs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8481
< GitHub65> bitcoin/master 0d0abca Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8481: Qt: Fix minimize and close bugs...
< GitHub65> bitcoin/master 05242e9 adlawren: Fix minimize and close bugs...
< GitHub65> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/edebf425a2df...0d0abcac1efe
< wumpus> the wallet utxo index may be helpful here, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7823
< GitHub104> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #8498: Optimization: Minimize the number of times it is checked that no money... (master...0.13-consensus-inputs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8498

2016-08-10

< jtimon> kanzure: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8493 looks like a long branch (because it has many tiny steps commits that could be squashed) but it's only +373 −94 , please check it out
< GitHub7> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8495: [0.13] Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT) (0.13...bugfix_gbt_sigops_presegwit-0.13.x) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8495
< GitHub52> bitcoin/0.13 8b0eee6 Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates...
< GitHub52> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/8b0eee66e9c9057b6e53bb1f4a0a3821083e5df0
< GitHub177> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8477: [qa] Temporarily disable ipv6 in rpcbind test (master...Mf1608-qaIpv6) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8477
< GitHub120> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8495: [0.13] Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT) (0.13...bugfix_gbt_sigops_presegwit-0.13.x) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8495
< GitHub185> bitcoin/0.13 45c656b Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8465: [0.13] Document reindexing changes...
< GitHub185> bitcoin/0.13 b49d963 Pieter Wuille: Document reindexing changes
< GitHub185> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/edc2c700a75c...45c656b914f0
< GitHub30> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8465: [0.13] Document reindexing changes (0.13...docreindex) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8465
< jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: So using tor hidden service over 443 would probably allow bypassing firewalls (assume some large company firewalls where only 80,443 is open) to connect to the bitcoin network?
< GitHub28> bitcoin/0.13 edc2c70 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8438: [0.13] backport: Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them...
< GitHub79> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8438: [0.13] backport: Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them (0.13...btc-13-sigops) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8438
< GitHub28> bitcoin/0.13 3f65ba2 Pieter Wuille: Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them
< GitHub28> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/114f7e944b1c...edc2c700a75c
< GitHub114> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8489: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT) (master...bugfix_gbt_sigops_presegwit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8489
< GitHub4> bitcoin/master edebf42 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8489: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT)...
< GitHub4> bitcoin/master 239cbd2 Luke Dashjr: qa/rpc-tests/segwit: Test GBT sigops before and after activation
< GitHub4> bitcoin/master 160f895 Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates
< GitHub4> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/484312bda2d4...edebf425a2df
< jonasschnelli> Would ICE works for Bitcoin? Or would that require UDP? (maybe off-topic here)
< jonasschnelli> Does bitcoin-cores UPNP (or UPNP in general) uses nat traversal or ICE? Or is the only way to get connection from the outside if your router supports uPNP and opens the port?
< GitHub189> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8494: [init, wallet] ParameterInteraction() iff wallet enabled (master...Mf1608-initWalletParamInt) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8494
< GitHub86> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8467: [Trivial] Do not shadow members in dbwrapper (master...20160805_Wshadow_dbwrapper) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8467
< GitHub128> bitcoin/master 484312b Pieter Wuille: Merge #8467: [Trivial] Do not shadow members in dbwrapper...
< GitHub128> bitcoin/master 4a35e0f Pavel Janík: Do not shadow members in dbwrapper
< GitHub128> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6e6ab2c32382...484312bda2d4

2016-08-09

< GitHub124> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #8493: Untested: libcosnensus: Expose VerifyHeader (master...0.13-consensus-header) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8493
< Chris_Stewart_5> What this documenation is describing is what really happens inside of `TraverseAndBuild` right? https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-reference#creating-a-merkleblock-message
< GitHub190> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #5916: add key generation type (master...2015/03/keygentype) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5916
< GitHub32> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8492: configure: Allow building bench_bitcoin by itself (master...conf_only_bench) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8492

2016-08-08

< GitHub30> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin reopened pull request #8464: "Lockfree" Checkqueue Implementation (master...lockfree-checkqueue-squashed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8464
< GitHub63> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin closed pull request #8464: "Lockfree" Checkqueue Implementation (master...lockfree-checkqueue-squashed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8464
< GitHub37> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8490: [0.13] release notes: Mention new relevance of non-mining nodes on network policy; s/HD/D/; and misc fixes (0.13...relnotes_013_misc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8490
< GitHub3> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8489: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT) (master...bugfix_gbt_sigops_presegwit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8489
< jonasschnelli> achow101: in case you want to compare the build log: https://bitcoin.jonasschnelli.ch/nightlybuilds/2016-08-08/build-win.log
< GitHub143> [bitcoin] maaku opened pull request #8488: Add deleteprivkey and forgetaddress RPC calls (master...forgetaddress-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8488
< GitHub104> [bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #8487: Persist the datadir after option reset (master...persist-datadir) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8487
< btcdrak> There is a website PR for the release, please can you review it https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/199
< GitHub19> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8486: [wallet] Add high transaction fee warnings (master...Mf1607-walletHighFeeWarn) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8486
< jonasschnelli> Adding something that could be called "detached signing" to bitcoin-core, would that require a BIP? Idea: during signing of a transaction, wallet can call/pipe a executable, send some transaction relevant information, wait for response, done.
< GitHub115> [bitcoin] mhughes30 closed pull request #8485: bitcoin_0.13 (0.13...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8485
< GitHub11> [bitcoin] mhughes30 opened pull request #8485: bitcoin_0.13 (0.13...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8485
< GitHub164> [bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #8484: More granular debug (master...MoreGranularDebug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8484

2016-08-07

< GitHub75> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8482: [qa] Use single cache dir for chains (master...Mf1608-qaCache) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8482
< GitHub173> [bitcoin] adlawren opened pull request #8481: Qt: Fix minimize and close bugs (master...fix-minimize-and-close-bugs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8481
< ebfull> cjd: probably more appropriate discussion for #bitcoin-wizards
< GitHub102> [bitcoin] unsystemizer opened pull request #8478: Ubuntu 14.04 server installs w/o curl (master...patch-3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8478

2016-08-06

< GitHub1> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8477: [qa] Temporarily disable ipv6 in rpcbind test (master...Mf1608-qaIpv6) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8477
< GitHub79> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8253: [TEST] [Travis] Remove hostname workaround (master...remove-travis-workaround) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8253
< GitHub58> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8474: 0 9 (master...0.9) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8474
< GitHub107> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8475: 0 10 (master...0.10) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8475
< GitHub74> [bitcoin] clickkarog opened pull request #8475: 0 10 (master...0.10) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8475
< GitHub83> [bitcoin] clickkarog opened pull request #8474: 0 9 (master...0.9) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8474
< GitHub185> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #8473: 0 9 (master...0.9) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8473
< GitHub87> [bitcoin] clickkarog opened pull request #8473: 0 9 (master...0.9) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8473
< GitHub160> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8472: Do not shadow LOCK's criticalblock variable for LOCK inside LOCK (master...20160806_Wshadow_LOCK) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8472
< GitHub43> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8471: Key origin metadata, with HD wallet support (master...keyorigin_hd) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8471
< sipa> this channel is about development of bitcoin core
< sipa> i doubt many people involved with bitcoin core development are interested in this
< sipa> sonlin: people were trying to innovate long before bitcoin had any value. increased value brought economic interest in influencing development with all associated politics
< sipa> sonlin: as a developer, i believe it would strongly undermine trust in bitcoin as an independent decentralized currency
< sipa> if bitcoin core were to introduce such a rule, i hope the community would refuse to run it
< sipa> also, bitcoin developers don't set the rules
< sonlin> But i was told by the developers that are making dsd that basically all bitcoin devs would switch over at once.
< sipa> kanzure: now you give bitcoin developers an incentive to go pump those altcoins :p
< kanzure> sipa: what about altcoins distributing payments to bitcoin developers as part of their protocol definitions?
< kanzure> the funny thing is that altcoins should probably hard-code their developer subsidies to pay bitcoin developers, so that the bitcoin developers continue to work, since altcoins benefit mainly from that development activity, and that subsidy doesn't interfere with the bitcoin protocol definition. however, iirc, developers in the past have said they would not touch any of those subsidy payments anyway.
< sipa> and we all want bitcoin to progress, but i don't think you do that by radically changing its economics
< sonlin> I just want bitcoin to progress.
< sipa> how do bitcoin holders decide?
< sonlin> Bitcoin holders and a combination of other methods.
< GitHub6> [bitcoin] Christewart opened pull request #8469: [POC] Introducing property based testing to Core (master...rapidcheck) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8469

2016-08-05

< paveljanik> cfields, self-assing: good catch. Look like I do not even understand the original code 8) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/net.h#L289
< NicolasDorier> jtimon: I think we shoudl talk about that in ##libconsensus on my side I'm still not decided whther I prefer the one flag approach of my approach (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8339/commits/a59f79dfb7a996e9b309aa43d699499339b1a7c4)
< GitHub14> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8468: Do not shadow member variables in serialization (master...20160805_Wshadow_serialization) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8468
< GitHub153> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8467: [Trivial] Do not shadow members in dbwrapper (master...20160805_Wshadow_dbwrapper) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8467
< jtimon> thoughts on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/master...jtimon:0.13-consensus-flags?expand=1 NicolasDorier btcdrak sipa should I open a PR?
< GitHub185> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8466: [Trivial] Do not shadow variables in networking code (master...20160805_Wshadow_net) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8466
< GitHub178> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8465: [0.13] Document reindexing changes (0.13...docreindex) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8465
< bsm117532> wizkid057, the exploding bitcoin spammer, somehow got op permissions on #bitcoin-wizards and is banning people. Can someone here take care of him?
< GitHub47> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin opened pull request #8464: "Lockfree" Checkqueue Implementation (master...lockfree-checkqueue-squashed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8464
< GitHub149> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8463: [qt] Remove Priority from coincontrol dialog (master...Mf1608-qtPrio) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8463
< GitHub188> [bitcoin] Mirobit opened pull request #8462: Move AdvertiseLocal debug output to net category (master...advertiselocal) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8462
< GitHub89> [bitcoin] Mirobit closed pull request #8283: Move AdvertiseLocal debug output to net category (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8283
< GitHub83> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #7865: [RPC] Add bumpfee command. (master...2016/04/rbf_combined) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7865
< gmaxwell> luke-jr: nothing held back blocksizes from growing from 250k to 1mb... not even the defaults in bitcoin core-- or large increases in orphaning rates.
< luke-jr> if they care about Bitcoin (but not per se enough to research their own opinion on block size limits), they should follow recommendations to set it lower.

2016-08-04

< GitHub92> [bitcoin] jlopp opened pull request #8461: document return value of networkhashps for getmininginfo RPC endpoint (master...rpcMiningHelp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8461
< GitHub193> [bitcoin] NicolasDorier opened pull request #8460: parametrize buried soft fork in regtest and refactor (master...buriedsf) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8460
< NicolasDorier> jtimon, I will soon make a PR similar to https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/6f98197634026e740a9172405386b15c3a79b5a5 along with another change to parametize buriedsf height for regtest
< jtimon> well, maybe the time for https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/6f98197634026e740a9172405386b15c3a79b5a5 is whenever bip113 activation is simplified from bip9 in the same way
< jtimon> if we knew we weren't doing it, we could have made https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/6f98197634026e740a9172405386b15c3a79b5a5 without bip34 directly in #8391...
< morcos> NicolasDorier: See this comment from sdaftuar: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8391#issuecomment-237584871
< NicolasDorier> I have a code question: I'm working on a commit similar to one from jtimon, he is removing one check here https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/compare/remove-ism...consensus-post-remove-ism#diff-7ec3c68a81efff79b6ca22ac1f1eabbaL2353 about BIP30, does somebody know if it is actually safe to do so ?
< luke-jr> #bitcoin-dev is also fairly quiet
< GitHub10> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8459: [0.13] release-notes: Do not encourage changing blockmaxsize to blockmaxweight (0.13...0.13_relnotes_remove_bad_advice) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8459
< GitHub168> [bitcoin] luke-jr closed pull request #8458: [0.13] release notes: remove bad advice to switch to blockmaxweight prematurely (master...0.13_relnotes_remove_bad_advice) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8458
< GitHub107> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8458: [0.13] release notes: remove bad advice to switch to blockmaxweight prematurely (master...0.13_relnotes_remove_bad_advice) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8458
< jonasschnelli> Yes. Maybe https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8438 + SW0.13 downgrade compatibility is worth a week delay
< * sipa> notes that we're only 3 days past the date in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7679
< jonasschnelli> ACK, I can live with https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8438 for 0.13.1 but don't know about others opinions.
< jonasschnelli> sipa: do you think https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8438 can wait for 0.13.1?
< kanzure> this isn't short-term development related but it's high signal-noise crypto content that a few developers recently participated in, http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/2016-july-bitcoin-developers-miners-meeting/dan-boneh/
< gmaxwell> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr btcdrak sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier
< wumpus> bitcoin is always without gmp
< GitHub127> bitcoin/0.13 114f7e9 MarcoFalke: Merge #8454: [0.13.1] Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior...
< GitHub182> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8454: [0.13.1] Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior (0.13...Mf1608-qaFeeFilter013) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8454
< GitHub127> bitcoin/0.13 cd0910b Suhas Daftuar: Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior...
< GitHub127> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d485a6c5a8d2...114f7e944b1c
< cfields> sipa: default passed down from bitcoin
< GitHub160> [bitcoin] pedrobranco opened pull request #8457: Add block height support in rpc call getblock (master...feature/add-get-block-by-number) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8457
< GitHub198> [bitcoin] mrbandrews opened pull request #8456: [RPC] Simplified bumpfee command. (master...ba-rpcbumpfee) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8456
< GitHub71> bitcoin/0.13 d485a6c Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Add list of new and removed RPC commands to release notes...
< GitHub71> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/d485a6c5a8d238cac5ad732ce9e744f4b121143c
< GitHub129> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8454: [0.13.1] Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior (0.13...Mf1608-qaFeeFilter013) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8454
< GitHub87> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8444: Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior (master...fix-feefilter-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8444
< GitHub189> bitcoin/master 6e6ab2c Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8444: Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior...
< GitHub189> bitcoin/master 2c517b3 Suhas Daftuar: Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior
< GitHub189> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f97d335942ae...6e6ab2c32382
< GitHub154> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8392: Fix several node initialization issues (master...fixactivatewait) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8392
< GitHub46> bitcoin/master 9d4eb9a Pieter Wuille: Do diskspace check before import thread is started
< GitHub46> bitcoin/master aa59f2e Pieter Wuille: Add extra message to avoid a long 'Loading banlist'
< GitHub46> bitcoin/master 0fd2a33 Pieter Wuille: Use a signal to continue init after genesis activation
< GitHub46> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/37d83bb0a980...f97d335942ae
< GitHub105> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8391: Consensus: Remove ISM (master...remove-ism) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8391
< GitHub18> bitcoin/master 37d83bb Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8391: Consensus: Remove ISM...
< GitHub18> bitcoin/master 122786d NicolasDorier: Consensus: Remove ISM
< GitHub18> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/5c7a5e1f66d8...37d83bb0a980
< GitHub30> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #8453: Bring secp256k1 subtree up to date with master (master...2016_08_update_secp256k1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8453
< sipa> there are certainly no regressions known that would make the current master less appropriate than the subtree in bitcoin currently
< GitHub106> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8452: Code simplification: inline CTxInWitness inside CTxIn (master...segwitinline) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8452
< GitHub184> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8451: Get rid of the const field in CTransaction (master...noconsttx) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8451

2016-08-03

< GitHub42> [bitcoin] pstratem opened pull request #8450: Remove rpc_wallet_tests.cpp (master...2016-08-03-remove-rpc-wallet-tests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8450
< GitHub139> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8449: [Trivial] Do not shadow local variable, cleanup (master...20160803_shadow_blockencodings) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8449
< GitHub43> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8316: [qa] feefilter: Clear mempool after each check (master...Mf1607-qafeefilter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8316
< GitHub152> bitcoin/0.13 b8b97c9 fanquake: [doc] Increase recommended memory in gitian build guide...
< GitHub152> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/b8b97c98e86f81cd11a3c582dcea1c201139f187
< GitHub39> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8439: [doc] Increase recommended memory in gitian build guide (master...gitian-guide-3000) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8439
< GitHub177> bitcoin/master 5c7a5e1 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8439: [doc] Increase recommended memory in gitian build guide...
< GitHub177> bitcoin/master 7fdbce9 fanquake: [doc] Increase recommended memory in gitian build guide
< GitHub177> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/194110fb911d...5c7a5e1f66d8
< GitHub195> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7914: [qa] Add optional unique coinbase generation (master...coinbase) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7914
< GitHub12> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7886: QA test fix: ensure unique coinbase transactions (master...rpctest_unique_coinbases) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7886
< GitHub171> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7568: Corrections to bad-chain alert triggering (master...fix_bad_chain_alert_trigger) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7568
< GitHub180> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8189: rename mapAddrCount to mapNetGroupNodes (master...mapAddrCounts) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8189
< GitHub171> bitcoin/master 657fc19 instagibbs: rename mapAddrCount to mapNetGroupNodes
< GitHub171> bitcoin/master 194110f Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8189: rename mapAddrCount to mapNetGroupNodes...
< GitHub171> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ced2d5ef7c3b...194110fb911d
< GitHub193> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8331: Fix three 'comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions' warnings. (master...fix-compilation-warnings) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8331
< GitHub148> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8377: [Wallet][Trivial] Rename usehd option to createhdwallet (master...2016-07-16-cwallet-createhdwallet) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8377
< GitHub95> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8446: [Trivial] BIP9 parameters on regtest cleanup (master...20160802_shadow_bip9params) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8446
< GitHub141> bitcoin/master ced2d5e Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8446: [Trivial] BIP9 parameters on regtest cleanup...
< GitHub141> bitcoin/master 0fc00be Pavel Janík: Do not shadow previous local variable
< GitHub141> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/fc93486d2a00...ced2d5ef7c3b
< GitHub141> bitcoin/master 115265b Pavel Janík: Trivial: bip -> BIP in help text and comment
< GitHub71> bitcoin/0.13 6c083ac Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8441: doc: Rewrite shell example to not leave secrets in the history file...
< GitHub53> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8441: doc: Rewrite shell example to not leave secrets in the history file (0.13...patch-17) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8441
< GitHub71> bitcoin/0.13 719208c paveljanik: Rewrite shell example to not leave secrets in the history file
< GitHub71> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ced6c940da35...6c083ac95c80
< GitHub68> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8428: Update README.md inside of src/test/ (master...imporve_test_readme) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8428
< GitHub86> bitcoin/master b8db185 Chris Stewart: Update README.md...
< GitHub86> bitcoin/master fc93486 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8428: Update README.md inside of src/test/...
< GitHub86> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/2eed09fe1e3d...fc93486d2a00
< GitHub7> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8442: [qa] Rework hd wallet dump test (master...Mf1608-qaWalletDump) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8442
< GitHub120> bitcoin/master 2eed09f Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8442: [qa] Rework hd wallet dump test...
< GitHub120> bitcoin/master fa4439d MarcoFalke: [qa] Rework hd wallet dump test
< GitHub120> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/63c03dd41cc0...2eed09fe1e3d
< GitHub153> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8448: Store mempool and prioritization data to disk (master...dumpmempool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8448
< Justinus> Hi, in the Bitcoin doc https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/doc, why does it say unpack and run bin/bitcoind ?

2016-08-02

< NicolasDorier> Actually, the bug I pointed out yestersday about time-too-new may really be a problem: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4vsvvm/bitcoind_stuck_at_block_422168_timestamp_too_far/.
< instagibbs> Sanakov, #bitcoin-otc
< GitHub15> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8436: Update release-notes.md (0.13...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8436
< wumpus> cfields: I don't get it, I don't manage to compile master for ARM anymore: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8447 however, in travis it's working. What could be the difference, that I'm compiling my own toolchain?
< GitHub103> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8446: BIP9 parameters on regtest cleanup (master...20160802_shadow_bip9params) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8446
< GitHub180> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8418: Add tests for compact blocks (master...cb-testing) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8418
< GitHub156> bitcoin/master a8689fd Suhas Daftuar: Tests: refactor compact size serialization in mininode
< GitHub156> bitcoin/master 9c8593d Pieter Wuille: Implement SipHash in Python
< GitHub156> bitcoin/master 56c87e9 Suhas Daftuar: Allow changing BIP9 parameters on regtest
< GitHub156> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 6 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ea268747b6d4...63c03dd41cc0
< GitHub23> [bitcoin] pstratem opened pull request #8445: Move CWallet::setKeyPool to private section of CWallet. (master...2016-07-01-cwallet-api-cleanup) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8445

2016-08-01

< GitHub99> [bitcoin] sdaftuar opened pull request #8444: Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior (master...fix-feefilter-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8444
< GitHub87> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #8443: [Wallet] Trivial cleanup of HD wallet changes (master...2016/08/hd_fixes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8443
< GitHub176> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8442: [qa] Rework hd wallet dump test (master...Mf1608-qaWalletDump) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8442
< GitHub172> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8419: Enable size accounting in mining unit tests (master...fix-mining-tests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8419
< GitHub132> bitcoin/master ea26874 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8419: Enable size accounting in mining unit tests...
< GitHub132> bitcoin/master 8bfd708 Suhas Daftuar: Enable size accounting in mining unit tests
< GitHub132> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/c7e05b35ab0a...ea268747b6d4
< GitHub90> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8440: Add warning about shell history file (master...20160801_clarify_stdin) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8440
< GitHub173> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8441: Add warning about shell history file (0.13...patch-17) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8441
< GitHub68> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8440: Add warning about shell history file (master...20160801_clarify_stdin) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8440
< GitHub76> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #8439: [doc] Increase recommended memory in gitian build guide (master...gitian-guide-3000) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8439
< GitHub7> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8432: Make CWallet::fFileBacked private. (master...2016-07-30-cwallet-encapsulation) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8432
< GitHub47> bitcoin/master c7e05b3 Pieter Wuille: Merge #8432: Make CWallet::fFileBacked private....
< GitHub47> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b9c1cd81848d...c7e05b35ab0a
< GitHub47> bitcoin/master 29c2d99 Patrick Strateman: Make CWallet::fFileBacked private.
< GitHub92> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8152: [Wallet] Remove CWalletDB* parameter from CWallet::AddToWallet (master...2016-06-06-cwallet-addtowallet-remove-cwalletdb) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8152
< GitHub12> bitcoin/master 5723bb4 Patrick Strateman: Remove unused pwalletdb from CWallet::AddToWallet
< GitHub12> bitcoin/master 867f842 Patrick Strateman: Remove CWalletDB* parameter from CWallet::AddToWallet
< GitHub12> bitcoin/master 00f09c9 Patrick Strateman: Split CWallet::AddToWallet into AddToWallet and LoadToWallet....
< GitHub12> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8ea7d31e3849...b9c1cd81848d

2016-07-31

< GitHub6> bitcoin/master 8ea7d31 Pieter Wuille: Merge #8413: Trivial: pass Consensus::Params& instead of CChainParams& in ContextualCheckBlock...
< GitHub59> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8413: Trivial: pass Consensus::Params& instead of CChainParams& in ContextualCheckBlock (master...0.13-consensus-last-params) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8413
< GitHub6> bitcoin/master c8664ee Jorge Timón: Trivial: pass Consensus::Params& instead of CChainParams& in ContextualCheckBlock
< GitHub6> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f798b891bcec...8ea7d31e3849
< GitHub126> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8346: Mempool: Use Consensus::CheckTxInputs direclty over main::CheckInputs (master...0.12.99-consensus-mempool-checks) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8346
< GitHub61> bitcoin/master f798b89 Pieter Wuille: Merge #8346: Mempool: Use Consensus::CheckTxInputs direclty over main::CheckInputs...
< GitHub61> bitcoin/master a6cc299 Jorge Timón: Mempool: Use Consensus::CheckTxInputs direclty over main::CheckInputs
< GitHub61> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/cf2cecb18779...f798b891bcec
< GitHub179> [bitcoin] dexX7 opened pull request #8438: [0.13] Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them (0.13...btc-13-sigops) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8438
< GitHub12> [bitcoin] jwilkins opened pull request #8436: Update release-notes.md (0.13...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8436
< GitHub53> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8400: [qa]: enable rpcbind_test (master...rpcbind-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8400
< GitHub163> bitcoin/master cf2cecb MarcoFalke: Merge #8400: [qa]: enable rpcbind_test...
< GitHub163> bitcoin/master 9bbb414 whythat: [qa]: enable rpcbind_test
< GitHub163> bitcoin/master 0ff4375 whythat: [qa]: add parsing for '<host>:<port>' argument form to rpc_url()
< GitHub163> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6caf3ee061a8...cf2cecb18779
< GitHub119> [bitcoin] blamb5 closed pull request #8435: Master (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8435
< GitHub71> [bitcoin] blamb5 opened pull request #8435: Master (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8435

2016-07-30

< GitHub0> [bitcoin] paveljanik closed pull request #8242: Check if the macro PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG was expanded. (master...20160622_check_pkg-config) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8242
< GitHub192> [bitcoin] pstratem opened pull request #8432: Make CWallet::fFileBacked private. (master...2016-07-30-cwallet-encapsulation) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8432
< GitHub134> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8238: [WIP][depends] ZeroMQ 4.1.5 && ZMQ on Windows (master...depends-zeromq-4-1-5) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8238
< GitHub114> bitcoin/master 6caf3ee Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8238: [WIP][depends] ZeroMQ 4.1.5 && ZMQ on Windows...
< GitHub114> bitcoin/master a615386 fanquake: [depends] ZeroMQ 4.1.5
< GitHub114> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ebefe7a00b46...6caf3ee061a8
< GitHub74> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8427: net: Ignore `notfound` P2P messages (master...2016_07_notfound) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8427
< GitHub102> bitcoin/master ebefe7a Pieter Wuille: Merge #8427: net: Ignore `notfound` P2P messages...
< GitHub102> bitcoin/master 5c9e49d Wladimir J. van der Laan: net: Ignore `notfound` P2P messages
< GitHub102> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/bbcb8fd88433...ebefe7a00b46

2016-07-29

< GitHub108> [bitcoin] Christewart opened pull request #8428: Update README.md (master...imporve_test_readme) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8428
< GitHub72> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8403: Process "notfound" messages, and safeguard against unreasonably long … (master...ProcessNotfound) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8403
< GitHub141> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #8427: net: Ignore `notfound` P2P messages (master...2016_07_notfound) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8427
< GitHub139> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8417: [QA] Add walletdump RPC test (including HD- & encryption-tests) (master...2016/07/dump_test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8417
< GitHub38> bitcoin/master bbcb8fd Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8417: [QA] Add walletdump RPC test (including HD- & encryption-tests)...
< GitHub38> bitcoin/master 54af51d Jonas Schnelli: [QA] Add walletdump RPC test (including HD- & encryption-tests)
< GitHub38> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/7a2d40272717...bbcb8fd88433
< GitHub181> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8274: util: Update tinyformat (master...2016_06_update_tinyformat) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8274
< GitHub12> bitcoin/master 7a2d402 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8274: util: Update tinyformat...
< GitHub12> bitcoin/master a5072a7 Wladimir J. van der Laan: util: Remove zero-argument versions of LogPrint and error...
< GitHub12> bitcoin/master 695041e Wladimir J. van der Laan: util: Update tinyformat...
< GitHub12> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b77bb95b3cb4...7a2d40272717
< GitHub55> bitcoin/master 7e87033 Cory Fields: httpserver: replace boost threads with std...
< GitHub56> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8421: httpserver: drop boost (#8023 dependency) (master...http-thread) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8421
< GitHub55> bitcoin/master d3773ca Cory Fields: httpserver: explicitly detach worker threads...
< GitHub55> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/842bf8d2c5af...b77bb95b3cb4
< GitHub55> bitcoin/master 755aa05 Cory Fields: httpserver: use a future rather than relying on boost's try_join_for
< GitHub72> bitcoin/0.13 ced6c94 Wladimir J. van der Laan: qt: Translations update pre-rc2
< GitHub72> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/ced6c940da35fcf33160d1c7f2f54a99dc7eedb1
< GitHub65> bitcoin/0.13 b06808c Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Release notes update for rc2
< GitHub65> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/b06808c58eb7a997c42b55cba63688aec448a0ea
< GitHub2> bitcoin/0.13 b7e2011 Suhas Daftuar: Prevent fingerprinting, disk-DoS with compact blocks...
< GitHub2> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/b7e201181bcc0f6328e0a499803f1dbb2c2dbd28
< GitHub16> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8408: Prevent fingerprinting, disk-DoS with compact blocks (master...cb-misbehaving) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8408
< GitHub182> bitcoin/master 842bf8d Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8408: Prevent fingerprinting, disk-DoS with compact blocks...
< GitHub182> bitcoin/master 1d06e49 Suhas Daftuar: Ignore CMPCTBLOCK messages for pruned blocks...
< GitHub182> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ad087638ee48...842bf8d2c5af
< GitHub182> bitcoin/master 1de2a46 Suhas Daftuar: Ignore GETBLOCKTXN requests for unknown blocks...
< GitHub87> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8424: merge (0.8...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8424
< GitHub151> [bitcoin] PrinceofOrange opened pull request #8424: merge (0.8...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8424
< GitHub111> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #8423: [depends] expat 2.2.0, ccache 3.2.7 (master...expat-ccache-jul) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8423
< NicolasDorier> cfields: when you feel like reviewing cached hashes : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8422
< GitHub146> [bitcoin] NicolasDorier closed pull request #8259: Hash Cache (master...cachedhashes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8259
< GitHub165> [bitcoin] NicolasDorier opened pull request #8422: Cache hashes (master...cachedhashes2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8422
< morcos> but my goal here is to optimize current bitcoin core performance