< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9773: Return errors from importmulti if complete rescans are not successful (master...pr/multicheck) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9773
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master ba7220b Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9773: Return errors from importmulti if complete rescans are not successful...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master e2e2f4c Russell Yanofsky: Return errors from importmulti if complete rescans are not successful
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #9823: qa: Set correct path for binaries in rpc tests (master...Mf1702-qaPath) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9823
< cfields>
(i haven't read the logs yet, if bitcoin-qt launches at all obviously that's not the culprit)
< wumpus>
which is sort of a one-file randomness library. Idon't think it depends on any bitcoin specific things
< wumpus>
e.g. user created containers and chroots won't have the /dev/urandom device, some sandboxes (such as cluodabi/capsicum) don' t have file access at all (not that we can support those at the moment in bitcoin core). Direct system calls are the new way to get randomness from the OS.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] benma opened pull request #9822: Refactor: Split part of AppInitMain() into a new function (master...appinitmain) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9822
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #9821: util: Specific GetOSRandom for Linux/FreeBSD/OpenBSD (master...2017_02_osrandom) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9821
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #9820: Fix pruning test broken by 2 hour manual prune window (master...pr/prunewind) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9820
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #9819: Remove harmless read of unusued priority estimates (master...removeExtraRead) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9819
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #9818: Save watch only key timestamps when reimporting keys (master...pr/multirewatch) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9818
< jonasschnelli>
wumpus: cd into the git bitcoin repository/depends and download all soucres?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #9817: Fix segfault crash when shutdown the GUI in disablewallet mode (master...2017/02/sf_gui) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9817
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/0.14 e22c067 kirit93: Fix for issue #9775. Added check for open() returning a NULL pointer....
< jonasschnelli>
Ah. I think there is a dnsmasq conflict with the bitcoin dns-seeder
< fanquake>
Can anyone confirm this. src/qt/bitcoin-qt --reindex --dbacache=8192 --par=10 --blocksonly=1 --listen=0 --disablewallet=1 quiting after any amount of time gives a segfault.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #9813: Read/write mempool.dat as a binary. (master...20170220_mempool_binary) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9813
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9726: netbase: Do not print an error on connection timeouts through proxy (master...2017_02_intr_recv_error) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9726
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 7639d38 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9726: netbase: Do not print an error on connection timeouts through proxy...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 3ddfe29 Wladimir J. van der Laan: netbase: Do not print an error on connection timeouts through proxy...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 13f6085 Wladimir J. van der Laan: netbase: Make InterruptibleRecv return an error code instead of bool
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 279f944 Luke Dashjr: QA: Test GBT size/weight limit values
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master aa791e2 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9619: Bugfix: RPC/Mining: GBT should return 1 MB sizelimit before segwit activates...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 9fc7f0b Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: RPC/Mining: GBT should return 1 MB sizelimit before segwit activates
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] petertodd opened pull request #9805: Add seed.btc.petertodd.org to mainnet DNS seeds (master...2017-02-add-pt-mainnet-seed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9805
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] JeremyRubin opened pull request #9804: Fixes subscript 0 (&var[0]) where should use (var.data()) instead. (master...fix-subscript-0) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9804
< da2ce7>
if you decide now to remove it in the next version, state. "in version 0.15, getinfo will be removed from bitcoin-core". :)
< wumpus>
I implemented getinfo client-side at some point (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8843) so that anyone using bitcoin-cli would hardly notice the command being removed from the server
< Arvidt>
Wladimir J. van der Laan (Bitcoin Core binary release signing key) <laanwj@gmail.com> 01EA 5486 DE18 A882 D4C2 6845 90C8 019E 36C2 E964 is expired
< luke-jr>
wumpus: the original reason I brought it up, was translators confusing it for "About Bitcoin-Qt". but that has since been resolved in other ways, so
< gmaxwell>
I think all this is kind of pointless, user use of bitcoin is dying because of sync resource requirements.
< gmaxwell>
I think that would be dandy. I dunno what about Bitcoin would say.
< luke-jr>
so the menu would have About Bitcoin Core and About Bitcoin; and the former's dialog have a link for About Qt?
< gmaxwell>
luke-jr: It might be better to put the QT link though on the about bitcoin core page though.
< luke-jr>
re "About Qt": we're using "About %1" now anyway, so the translation issue is presumably gone, and Qt might actually be worth promoting anyway; thinking perhaps what would be an improvement there is to add an "About Bitcoin" :p
< cfields>
Binary files bitcoin-0.14.0-me/bin/bitcoin-qt and bitcoin-0.14.0-achow/bin/bitcoin-qt differ
< cfields>
achow101: can you drop your bitcoin-0.14.0-osx64.tar.gz somewhere?
2017-02-17
< sipa>
in past times, it seems "Qt" was even understood to refer to the bitcoin core program name
< * luke-jr>
wonders if we should remove "About Qt" from the menu. It seems (without knowing the languages) translators are interpreting "Qt" as "Bitcoin-Qt"
< Chris_Stewart_5>
The Chronicles of Bitcoin Core (TM)
< wumpus>
brg444 did a nice writeup on bitcoin core performance improvements
< wumpus>
i'm certainly in favor of publishing awesome developer changes in bitcoin core, but I'm not sure the release notes is the right place for that
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] theuni opened pull request #9783: release: bump gitian descriptors for a new 0.14 package cache (0.14...gitian-descriptor-bump) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9783
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/0.14 268c390 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Update manpages for 0.14.0
< gmaxwell>
If someone argued that adding encryption to Bitcoin would make some state actors hate bitcoin, I think that could be pretty easily refuted.
< luke-jr>
gmaxwell: or possibly scared of what State actors opposing encryption might do to them/Bitcoin
< jeremyrubin>
travis-gate was really a sad week for bitcoin ;)
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #9780: Suppress noisy output from qa tests in Travis (master...travislogging) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9780
< wumpus>
well if the first line contains python3 it should be run with python 3, lacking that there is no general way to detect whether code is python2 or python3. But believe me, the bitcoin core python scripts need to be run with python 3.
< wumpus>
you should run all the bitcoin core scripts with python 3
< jnewbery>
jonasschnelli: My preference would be to also move the bitcoin-util-test.py and bctest.py (and data for those tests) from src/test to whatever you rename qa to. Those tests seem much more like the integration tests in qa than the unit tests in src/test
< petertodd>
gmaxwell: re: VM image being snapshotted and restored, that's basically a case where reusing a secret is by itself harmful - is there an example in Bitcoin where that's the case, now that we do deterministic signing?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] gmaxwell opened pull request #9779: Update nMinimumChainWork and defaultAssumeValid. (master...update_chainparams) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9779
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9773 | WIP: Return errors from importmulti if complete rescans are not successful (on top of #9761) by ryanofsky · Pull Request #9773 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9619 | Bugfix: RPC/Mining: GBT should return 1 MB sizelimit before segwit activates by luke-jr · Pull Request #9619 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9761 | Use 2 hour grace period for key timestamps in importmulti rescans by ryanofsky · Pull Request #9761 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9761 | Use 2 hour grace period for key timestamps in importmulti rescans by ryanofsky · Pull Request #9761 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9773 | WIP: Return errors from importmulti if complete rescans are not successful by ryanofsky · Pull Request #9773 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub