< provoostenator>
So I managed to install QT Creator and I'm able to use to run bitcoin-qt and edit C++ files. However what I'm trying to do is edit one of the .ui files. Unfortunately the Design tab is greyed out, and I don't see these .ui files in the project.
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11178 | Add iswitness parameter to decode- and fundrawtransaction RPCs by MeshCollider · Pull Request #11178 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #11936: [build] Warn that only libconsensus can be built without Boost (master...libcon-boost) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11936
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 3eb4d45 Varunram: [build] Warn that only libconsensus can be built without boost
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 483bb67 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11936: [build] Warn that only libconsensus can be built without Boost...
< mrannanay>
Oh alright :) It just occurred to me that in this setup ```$ bitcoin-cli generate 100``` executes in ~ 1sec - is this an indication of low difficulty?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hsjoberg opened pull request #11937: GUI: Setting for deciding address type (legacy, p2sh or bech32) (master...segwitwalletguioption) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11937
< echeveria>
promag: if you're losing ZMQ frames with a unix domain socket you've got other issues. there's sequence numbers in the messages that Bitcoin Core emits too, so you should be able to detect if you're getting messages lost.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #11936: [build] Warn that only libconsensus can be built without Boost (master...libcon-boost) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11936
< fanquake>
adam_ asdfasdf Yes, this channel is used for discussion specific to core development, as well as dev meetings. See https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/ for logs.
< Provoostenator>
Here we go: seed.testnet.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl - runs on EC2, I don't know if that's good enough for testnet (if you're seeing A 66.111... you need to wait a bit)
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #11886: Clarify getbalance meaning a tiny bit in response to questions. (master...2017-12-getbalance-docs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11886
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master df71819 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11886: Clarify getbalance meaning a tiny bit in response to questions....
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master c79d73d Matt Corallo: Clarify getbalance meaning a tiny bit in response to questions.
< Provoostenator>
Well, if you'd done that, maybe Bitcoin would never have taken off :-)
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #11616: Update ban-state in case of dirty-state during periodic sweep (master...2017/11/qt_ban) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11616
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 8585bb8 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11616: Update ban-state in case of dirty-state during periodic sweep...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 57ac471 Jonas Schnelli: Call BannedListChanged outside of cs_setBanned lock
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master c853812 Jonas Schnelli: Update ban-state in case of dirty-state during periodic sweep
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11616 | Update ban-state in case of dirty-state during periodic sweep by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #11616 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< wumpus>
heh that didn't go too well with the bitcoin foundation... anyhow off topic here
< meshcollider>
danklasson: I don't think bitcoin core counts as a charity ;)
< danklasson>
I don't know if you guys know. But supposedly this guy set up this fund where you can apply for 1 million dollars donation. Would you guys say that could be used to hire a bunch of devs working on several projects related to Bitcoin, such as segwit supported wallets and LN. What's your thoughts regarding this? https://pineapplefund.org/
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #11903: [trivial] Add required package dependencies for depends cross compilation (master...2017/12/depends_pkg) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11903
< wumpus>
then again, that would defeat its entire purpose for things like bitcoin and P2P programs, again requiring the users to manually change a setting
< sipa>
very early versions of bitcoin used whatismyip.com, no joke :)
< wumpus>
bitcoin wasn't the only affected program, but one of the worst, because it had the upnp structures on the stack
< gmaxwell>
sipa: in fact it would be perfectly useful in bitcoin for batch validation if but for the ecda reduction of R.x mod P and the lack of R's sign.
< Provoostenator>
Next time you go to a shop, they'll offer you a bitcoin payment option. Super convenient!
< jnewbery>
I've sent invites to everyone I think contributes regularly to Bitcoin Core or lightning implementations. If you think you should have got an invite and haven't, plese message me
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11639 | Rewrite the interface between validation and net_processing wrt DoS by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #11639 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11639 | Rewrite the interface between validation and net_processing wrt DoS by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #11639 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10839: Don't use pass by reference to const for cheaply-copied types (bool, char, etc.) (master...dont-pass-by-reference-for-cheaply-copied-types) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10839
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master c66adb2 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10839: Don't use pass by reference to const for cheaply-copied types (bool, char, etc.)...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 99ba0c3 practicalswift: Don't use pass by reference to const for cheaply-copied types (bool, char, etc.).
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10839 | Dont use pass by reference to const for cheaply-copied types (bool, char, etc.) by practicalswift · Pull Request #10839 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #11884: Remove unused include in hash.cpp (master...20171213-unneeded-include-hash-cpp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11884
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 66479c0 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11884: Remove unused include in hash.cpp...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 3f09e03 Karl-Johan Alm: Remove unused include in hash.cpp
< wumpus>
kabaum_: yes that is possible (might be better to ask in #bitcoin-wizards)
< wumpus>
bitcoin core's wallet is not optimized for handling huge numbers of transactions, for example it keeps them all in memory, and doesn't at the moment have an utxo index. There has been work in that direction but any help is welcome.
< JackH>
is there a limitation to how many addresses Bitcoin Core can generate for a given wallet? We issue about 500 new addresses per day, some which are used, some which are not, but is there a limit per wallet?
< fanquake>
I'm going to delete the "help me hard fork bitcoin for $500" comments and lock the threads they've been posted on. Seem to be kind of alt-coin related anyway.
< Nobody_>
Blockchain ECDSA Public Key (Bitcoin Compatible): 15oZ3FrhQJsVnpT6Ho1ZrQFQRnaaZF9gdS exists since Wed Oct 11 2017 19:09:57 GMT-0700 (Pacific Summer Time) Hash (In HEX) SHA3-384 23b81d863e9607f3416d14cb5913ee4e83cc7bf32ae3a6fab12c53e741ac7dda028c3dcc1d25950bb2f1122cacba10ba SHA3-512 cc7240e11c025e2411630ba97e2e7cf59aa684823a147d1a3972d7b4eaf3019af7d8c25dcb25a6c25cd7b5b9b7f72c944b0fd6e7bda4aa365f036cc4a188fc65 HMAC (In
< Nobody_>
Please update Satoshi Nakamoto & The Bitcoin Core Developers that the Blockchain is complete and Copyright Free for this Holiday Season
2017-12-13
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #11892: [Qt] Warn if fallback fee has been used (master...2017/12/qt_warn_fallbackfee) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11892
< ossifrage>
and 'bitcoin-cli listreceivedbyaddress 0 true | jq .[].address | grep <getrawchangeaddress>' does not return the address
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #11886: Clarify getbalance meaning a tiny bit in response to questions. (master...2017-12-getbalance-docs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11886
< ThemoonMoth>
And it's effect on bitcoin development in the US
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift closed pull request #11734: rpc: Work around Clang thread safety analysis quirks (master...clang-thread-safety-quirks) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11734
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jimhashhq reopened pull request #10922: New file-partition.md doc describing how to partition files to ensure fast initial blockchain synchronization.. (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10922
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10692 | Make mapBlockIndex and chainActive and all CBlockIndex*es const outside of validation/CChainState by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #10692 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gmaxwell>
well they design the rules, so ... well the really misleading part is to claim it is really related to bitcoin at all, it's just a massively premined dumb altcoin, where they happened to give a small portion to people who generated excess tx volume in the last week.
< Provoostenator>
I'm sure it will stabilize at 0. I personally don't find it very productive to try and get media to report bitcoin related thing correctly.
< Provoostenator>
Yes, which would include the bitcoin diamonds(?) person whose gitian signature was recently added to a PR.
< wumpus>
the only solution is to call everyone bitcoin core developer that contributed one patch, or heck even a translation message
< wumpus>
once someone is a bitcoin core developer you'll never leave, so beware :)
< Provoostenator>
If you click on the dropdown next to Bitcoin at the top, you shoudl see Organization Settings.
< wumpus>
I can't even find where to add you, I can go to https://www.transifex.com/bitcoin/teams/159/nl_NL/ and see your name under "translators" but I don't see how to move you to coorindator or reviewer
< wumpus>
maybe it's realistic now that bitcoin is so well-known
< sipa>
xmsx: sorry, this the dev channel for bitcoin core, a c++ bitcoin client
< xmsx>
I'm trying to generate segwit address in PHP but not sure if I got it right, and my bitcoin got corrupted database for some reason so I can't test it properly
< jnewbery>
If you're stop-starting nodes and expect them to pick up changes in bitcoin.conf, then I see no problem with changing it in run_test().
< jnewbery>
meshcollider: by default, the test_framework will start your nodes in self.setup_nodes(), which is called *before* run_test() begins. That means if you don't restart your bitcoin nodes, then they won't see any changes in bitcoin.conf that you make in run_test()
< meshcollider>
jnewbery: is there anything wrong with modifying bitcoin.conf in run_test() or should that only be done in setup_chain() ?
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10692 | Make mapBlockIndex and chainActive and all CBlockIndex*es const outside of validation/CChainState by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #10692 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10279 | Add a CChainState class to validation.cpp to take another step towards clarifying internal interfaces by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #10279 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub