2016-08-16

< sipa> Chris_Stewart_5: the sighash type is something bitcoin specific
< GitHub26> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8527: Take minRelayTxFee into account in FEEFILTER messages (master...clampfeefilter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8527
< GitHub50> [bitcoin] jl2012 opened pull request #8526: Make non-minimal OP_IF/NOTIF argument non-standard for P2WSH (master...minimalif) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8526
< GitHub8> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8525: Do not store witness txn in rejection cache (master...nowitnessreject) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8525
< GitHub76> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8524: Precompute sighashes (master...noprecomputecachedhashes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8524
< NicolasDorier> sipa: yep, just reviewed it, now I would prefer you make a new PR which supersede mine with https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commits/noprecomputecachedhashes, you can squash the two commits as well.
< GitHub136> bitcoin/0.13 2f58589 Pieter Wuille: Mention dump/import support for HD wallets
< GitHub136> bitcoin/0.13 fe20b83 Pieter Wuille: Remove refactors from list of changes
< GitHub136> bitcoin/0.13 7f84015 Pieter Wuille: Inline mempool RPCs and feefilter into misc sections
< GitHub97> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8519: [0.13] A few small improvements to the 0.13 release notes (0.13...relnotes-0.13) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8519
< GitHub136> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 4 new commits to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b52c67c4b188...4374f0ee35f8
< GitHub99> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #8521: qa: Remove duplicate `hash160` implementation (master...2016_08_hash160_dupe) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8521
< Lightsword> sipa, ugh…I have that because sendrawtransaction doesn’t have an option like this https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7533
< GitHub26> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8516: [trivial] remove no-longer-used InitError logic (master...deadiniterr) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8516
< GitHub37> bitcoin/master 2c2d471 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8516: [trivial] remove no-longer-used InitError logic...
< GitHub37> bitcoin/master edb6cf1 instagibbs: remove no-longer-used InitError logic
< GitHub37> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/bbd9740f534f...2c2d471e18f0
< GitHub58> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #8520: build: Remove check for `openssl/ec.h` (master...2016_08_remove_openssl_ech_check) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8520
< GitHub169> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8519: [0.13] A few small improvements to the 0.13 release notes (0.13...relnotes-0.13) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8519
< GitHub125> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8058: [Doc] Add issue template (master...docPRT) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8058
< GitHub162> bitcoin/master bbd9740 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8058: [Doc] Add issue template...
< GitHub162> bitcoin/master 3897668 CryptoVote: Adds issue template. [skip ci]
< GitHub162> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6e5e5abba6f8...bbd9740f534f

2016-08-15

< GitHub176> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #8517: [Qt] show wallet version and HD state in debugwindow (master...2016/08/hd_gui) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8517
< GitHub30> [bitcoin] instagibbs opened pull request #8516: [trivial] remove no-longer-used InitError logic (master...deadiniterr) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8516
< GitHub68> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8270: Tests: Use portable #! in python scripts (/usr/bin/env) (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8270
< GitHub119> bitcoin/master 6e5e5ab MarcoFalke: Merge #8270: Tests: Use portable #! in python scripts (/usr/bin/env)...
< GitHub119> bitcoin/master 7b01ce2 Matthew King: Favour python over python2 as per PR #7723
< GitHub119> bitcoin/master 873e81f Matthew King: Use portable #! in python scripts (/usr/bin/env)
< GitHub119> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/c50386315093...6e5e5abba6f8
< GitHub137> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #8192: [trivial] Remove URLs from About dialog translations (master...source-code-link) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8192
< GitHub161> bitcoin/master c503863 Jonas Schnelli: Merge #8192: [trivial] Remove URLs from About dialog translations...
< GitHub161> bitcoin/master 208d37f fanquake: [trivial] Remove URLs from About dialog translations
< GitHub161> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/1030fa718c59...c50386315093
< MarcoFalke> sipa: src/qt/bitcoin-qt -testnet -disablewallet -addnode=bitcoin.sipa.be -printtoconsole
< sipa> try -addnode=bitcoin.sipa.be ?
< GitHub11> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8128: Net: Turn net structures into dumb storage classes (master...split-resolve) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8128
< GitHub78> bitcoin/master b6c3ff3 Cory Fields: net: Split resolving out of CSubNet
< GitHub78> bitcoin/master f96c7c4 Cory Fields: net: Split resolving out of CService
< GitHub78> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 9 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d727f77e3904...1030fa718c59
< GitHub78> bitcoin/master 31d6b1d Cory Fields: net: Split resolving out of CNetAddr
< GitHub109> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8515: A few mempool removal optimizations (master...moresharedmem) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8515
< GitHub95> [bitcoin] jl2012 opened pull request #8514: Enforce LOW_S rules on all transactions with WITNESS BIP9 parameters (master...lows) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8514
< GitHub151> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #7946: Reduce cs_main locks during ConnectTip/SyncWithWallets (master...2016/04/cs_main_wallet) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7946
< GitHub92> bitcoin/master d727f77 Pieter Wuille: Merge #7946: Reduce cs_main locks during ConnectTip/SyncWithWallets...
< GitHub92> bitcoin/master b3b3c2a Jonas Schnelli: Reduce cs_main locks during ConnectTip/SyncWithWallets
< GitHub92> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/38590729631c...d727f77e3904
< GitHub134> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin opened pull request #8513: Fix a type error that would not compile on OSX. (master...fix-osx-break) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8513

2016-08-14

< GitHub85> [bitcoin] sevastos opened pull request #8512: Trivial: Corrected JSON typo on setban of net.cpp (master...setban) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8512
< GitHub143> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8509: Master (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8509
< GitHub5> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8510: Bitcoin 139 d4.9 (master...bitcoin-139-d4.9) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8510
< GitHub93> [bitcoin] PrinceofOrange opened pull request #8510: Bitcoin 139 d4.9 (master...bitcoin-139-d4.9) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8510
< GitHub125> [bitcoin] PrinceofOrange opened pull request #8509: Master (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8509

2016-08-13

< instagibbs> so I realized that Core on Windows has a "Verified Publisher" of "The Bitcoin Foundation Inc"
< btcdrak> Maybe we could host the RCs at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/releases/tag/v0.13.0rc3
< GitHub140> [bitcoin] leijurv closed pull request #8506: Trivial: Standardize spelling of "serialize" and "optimize" in mining.cpp and main.cpp (master...serialise-typo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8506
< GitHub47> [bitcoin] leijurv closed pull request #8507: Trivial: Standardize spelling of "optimization" vs "optimisation" in main.cpp (master...optimization-typo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8507
< GitHub93> [bitcoin] leijurv opened pull request #8507: Trivial: Standardize spelling of "optimization" vs "optimisation" in main.cpp (master...optimization-typo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8507
< GitHub107> [bitcoin] leijurv opened pull request #8506: Trivial: Fix typo in mining.cpp (master...serialise-typo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8506
< achow101> instagibbs: I have it up on github https://github.com/achow101/bitcoin/releases/tag/v0.13.0rc3
< GitHub16> [bitcoin] leijurv opened pull request #8505: Trivial: Fix typo in main.cpp (master...replacable-typo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8505
< instagibbs> bitcoin.org is down, someone have rc3 binary link
< GitHub138> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #8504: test: Remove java comparison tool (master...2016_08_jexit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8504
< GitHub41> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8353: Trivial: tiny c++11 refactors (master...cpp11) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8353
< GitHub32> bitcoin/master c784086 whythat: use std::map::emplace() instead of std::map::insert()
< GitHub32> bitcoin/master 5e187e7 whythat: use c++11 std::unique_ptr instead of boost::shared_ptr
< GitHub32> bitcoin/master 947913f whythat: use std::map::erase(const_iterator, const_iterator) to get non-constant iterator
< GitHub32> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/efce84d888a6...38590729631c
< GitHub52> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8293: Bugfix: Allow building libbitcoinconsensus without any univalue (master...sys_univalue_opt) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8293
< GitHub49> bitcoin/master efce84d Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8293: Bugfix: Allow building libbitcoinconsensus without any univalue...
< GitHub49> bitcoin/master 8a270b2 Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: Allow building libbitcoinconsensus without any univalue
< GitHub49> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/fe1780ed3eca...efce84d888a6
< GitHub130> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8492: configure: Allow building bench_bitcoin by itself (master...conf_only_bench) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8492
< GitHub117> bitcoin/master fe1780e Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8492: configure: Allow building bench_bitcoin by itself...
< GitHub117> bitcoin/master 216d796 Luke Dashjr: configure: Allow building bench_bitcoin by itself
< GitHub117> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/94368d643473...fe1780ed3eca
< GitHub142> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8503: [doc] typos, text errors (master...Test-branch) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8503
< GitHub166> bitcoin/master 94368d6 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8503: [doc] typos, text errors...
< GitHub166> bitcoin/master e11f9a2 Justin Camarena: [doc] typos, READMEs, comments...
< GitHub166> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0d0abcac1efe...94368d643473
< midnightmagic> cjcj: But this isn't the place for it. Please ask in #bitcoin.

2016-08-12

< GitHub137> [bitcoin] juscamarena opened pull request #8503: [doc] typos, text errors (master...Test-branch) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8503
< wumpus> to be clear I really like this funcitonality in the GUI, and possible in bitcoin-cli, but let's not conflate this with hypothetical JSON-RPC nested commanding
< jonasschnelli> Anyone interested in testing this: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7783?
< wumpus> but even more low-traffic. Most bitcoin developer don't like mailling lists a lot, it seems, most discussion happens on github and IRC
< jonasschnelli> There is also a bitcoin-core lf mailing list,... this would be for Bitcoin-Core topics
< jonasschnelli> JZA: bitcoin-dev is more for protocol discussion (must not be directly related to Bitcoin-Core)
< JZA> is the linux foundation bitcoin-dev the official mailing list for bitcoin-core development?
< GitHub4> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #8501: Add mempool statistics collector (master...2016/08/stats_rpc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8501
< murch> jonasschnelli: I'm currently working on a Master thesis on Coin Selection. You might recognize my nickname from Bitcoin.Stackexchange.com ;)
< jonasschnelli> which bitcoin definitively isn't
< sipa> that should be on bitcoin.org even
< Lightsword> sipa, so that won’t conflict with other messages unless something else used “sendcmpct” in NetMsgType here right? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/d612837814020ae832499d18e6ee5eb919a87907/src/protocol.cpp#L38

2016-08-11

< luke-jr> actually, tests could use review independently: https://github.com/bitcoin/libblkmaker/pull/7
< GitHub177> bitcoin/0.13 b52c67c Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Update changelog for rc3
< GitHub177> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/b52c67c4b188c274de60fbd5e26441e9a644dba6
< GitHub73> bitcoin/0.13 9058617 Wladimir J. van der Laan: qt: translations update pre-rc3
< GitHub73> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/9058617afb24594f09848d2a53403760bd64470a
< TD-Linux> they submitted a BIP draft to bitcoin-dev which only reserved the bit with no documentation of what it did
< murch> Lightsword: Don't let yourself quote like that. You'll face endless harrassment on Reddit. :p I'm having a hard time finding the Bitcoin Classic release notes.
< murch> By the way, while there are still lots of well-informed people reading this. Does anyone else have another list of realistic spending values for Bitcoin Nodes? I'd love to have a second scenario to test my coin selection simulation on.
< pigeons> i asked before too, got answers about gavin making changes for CIA, "only real bitcoin address starts with a 1", etc
< luke-jr> jtimon: to answer your earlier question best I can: I think they perceive 0.5.3 as the last release before the Bitcoin Foundation "got involved" (I know the BCF was never involved, but they're conspiracy nuts)
< gmaxwell> e.g. if you update your bitcoin node and then days/weeks later it starts doing thing with segwit commitments that breaks your miners or pooling software, that is preferable. You would prefer the break to happen at upgrade time.
< btcdrak> There's also a blog post being written about 0.13.0 if some eyes could review and comment https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/199
< wumpus> not seeing anything here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/milestone/20
< luke-jr> on the off-chance there's no objection, I'd like to PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/5a716a3bc6621e4d2e2c1de5b6b5596d6877d589 for 0.13.0 mostly just to make #8459 uncontroversial
< wumpus> they probably write raw transactions in their head instead of using the bitcoin core wallet
< wumpus> they're not really coupled the same way in other software than bitcoin core
< jl2012> this is a conceptual PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8499
< gmaxwell> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr btcdrak sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier
< GitHub118> [bitcoin] jl2012 opened pull request #8499: [Untested] Check bad witness (master...badwitnesscheck) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8499
< GitHub196> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8481: Qt: Fix minimize and close bugs (master...fix-minimize-and-close-bugs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8481
< GitHub65> bitcoin/master 0d0abca Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8481: Qt: Fix minimize and close bugs...
< GitHub65> bitcoin/master 05242e9 adlawren: Fix minimize and close bugs...
< GitHub65> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/edebf425a2df...0d0abcac1efe
< wumpus> the wallet utxo index may be helpful here, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7823
< GitHub104> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #8498: Optimization: Minimize the number of times it is checked that no money... (master...0.13-consensus-inputs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8498

2016-08-10

< jtimon> kanzure: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8493 looks like a long branch (because it has many tiny steps commits that could be squashed) but it's only +373 −94 , please check it out
< GitHub7> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8495: [0.13] Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT) (0.13...bugfix_gbt_sigops_presegwit-0.13.x) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8495
< GitHub52> bitcoin/0.13 8b0eee6 Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates...
< GitHub52> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/8b0eee66e9c9057b6e53bb1f4a0a3821083e5df0
< GitHub177> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8477: [qa] Temporarily disable ipv6 in rpcbind test (master...Mf1608-qaIpv6) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8477
< GitHub120> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8495: [0.13] Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT) (0.13...bugfix_gbt_sigops_presegwit-0.13.x) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8495
< GitHub185> bitcoin/0.13 45c656b Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8465: [0.13] Document reindexing changes...
< GitHub185> bitcoin/0.13 b49d963 Pieter Wuille: Document reindexing changes
< GitHub185> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/edc2c700a75c...45c656b914f0
< GitHub30> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8465: [0.13] Document reindexing changes (0.13...docreindex) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8465
< jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: So using tor hidden service over 443 would probably allow bypassing firewalls (assume some large company firewalls where only 80,443 is open) to connect to the bitcoin network?
< GitHub28> bitcoin/0.13 edc2c70 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8438: [0.13] backport: Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them...
< GitHub79> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8438: [0.13] backport: Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them (0.13...btc-13-sigops) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8438
< GitHub28> bitcoin/0.13 3f65ba2 Pieter Wuille: Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them
< GitHub28> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/114f7e944b1c...edc2c700a75c
< GitHub114> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8489: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT) (master...bugfix_gbt_sigops_presegwit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8489
< GitHub4> bitcoin/master edebf42 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8489: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT)...
< GitHub4> bitcoin/master 239cbd2 Luke Dashjr: qa/rpc-tests/segwit: Test GBT sigops before and after activation
< GitHub4> bitcoin/master 160f895 Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates
< GitHub4> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/484312bda2d4...edebf425a2df
< jonasschnelli> Would ICE works for Bitcoin? Or would that require UDP? (maybe off-topic here)
< jonasschnelli> Does bitcoin-cores UPNP (or UPNP in general) uses nat traversal or ICE? Or is the only way to get connection from the outside if your router supports uPNP and opens the port?
< GitHub189> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8494: [init, wallet] ParameterInteraction() iff wallet enabled (master...Mf1608-initWalletParamInt) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8494
< GitHub86> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8467: [Trivial] Do not shadow members in dbwrapper (master...20160805_Wshadow_dbwrapper) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8467
< GitHub128> bitcoin/master 484312b Pieter Wuille: Merge #8467: [Trivial] Do not shadow members in dbwrapper...
< GitHub128> bitcoin/master 4a35e0f Pavel Janík: Do not shadow members in dbwrapper
< GitHub128> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6e6ab2c32382...484312bda2d4

2016-08-09

< GitHub124> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #8493: Untested: libcosnensus: Expose VerifyHeader (master...0.13-consensus-header) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8493
< Chris_Stewart_5> What this documenation is describing is what really happens inside of `TraverseAndBuild` right? https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-reference#creating-a-merkleblock-message
< GitHub190> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #5916: add key generation type (master...2015/03/keygentype) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5916
< GitHub32> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8492: configure: Allow building bench_bitcoin by itself (master...conf_only_bench) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8492

2016-08-08

< GitHub30> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin reopened pull request #8464: "Lockfree" Checkqueue Implementation (master...lockfree-checkqueue-squashed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8464
< GitHub63> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin closed pull request #8464: "Lockfree" Checkqueue Implementation (master...lockfree-checkqueue-squashed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8464
< GitHub37> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8490: [0.13] release notes: Mention new relevance of non-mining nodes on network policy; s/HD/D/; and misc fixes (0.13...relnotes_013_misc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8490
< GitHub3> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8489: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT) (master...bugfix_gbt_sigops_presegwit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8489
< jonasschnelli> achow101: in case you want to compare the build log: https://bitcoin.jonasschnelli.ch/nightlybuilds/2016-08-08/build-win.log
< GitHub143> [bitcoin] maaku opened pull request #8488: Add deleteprivkey and forgetaddress RPC calls (master...forgetaddress-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8488
< GitHub104> [bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #8487: Persist the datadir after option reset (master...persist-datadir) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8487
< btcdrak> There is a website PR for the release, please can you review it https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/199
< GitHub19> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8486: [wallet] Add high transaction fee warnings (master...Mf1607-walletHighFeeWarn) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8486
< jonasschnelli> Adding something that could be called "detached signing" to bitcoin-core, would that require a BIP? Idea: during signing of a transaction, wallet can call/pipe a executable, send some transaction relevant information, wait for response, done.
< GitHub115> [bitcoin] mhughes30 closed pull request #8485: bitcoin_0.13 (0.13...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8485
< GitHub11> [bitcoin] mhughes30 opened pull request #8485: bitcoin_0.13 (0.13...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8485
< GitHub164> [bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #8484: More granular debug (master...MoreGranularDebug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8484

2016-08-07

< GitHub75> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8482: [qa] Use single cache dir for chains (master...Mf1608-qaCache) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8482
< GitHub173> [bitcoin] adlawren opened pull request #8481: Qt: Fix minimize and close bugs (master...fix-minimize-and-close-bugs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8481
< ebfull> cjd: probably more appropriate discussion for #bitcoin-wizards
< GitHub102> [bitcoin] unsystemizer opened pull request #8478: Ubuntu 14.04 server installs w/o curl (master...patch-3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8478

2016-08-06

< GitHub1> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8477: [qa] Temporarily disable ipv6 in rpcbind test (master...Mf1608-qaIpv6) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8477
< GitHub79> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8253: [TEST] [Travis] Remove hostname workaround (master...remove-travis-workaround) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8253
< GitHub58> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8474: 0 9 (master...0.9) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8474
< GitHub107> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #8475: 0 10 (master...0.10) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8475
< GitHub74> [bitcoin] clickkarog opened pull request #8475: 0 10 (master...0.10) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8475
< GitHub83> [bitcoin] clickkarog opened pull request #8474: 0 9 (master...0.9) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8474
< GitHub185> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #8473: 0 9 (master...0.9) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8473
< GitHub87> [bitcoin] clickkarog opened pull request #8473: 0 9 (master...0.9) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8473
< GitHub160> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8472: Do not shadow LOCK's criticalblock variable for LOCK inside LOCK (master...20160806_Wshadow_LOCK) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8472
< GitHub43> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8471: Key origin metadata, with HD wallet support (master...keyorigin_hd) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8471
< sipa> this channel is about development of bitcoin core
< sipa> i doubt many people involved with bitcoin core development are interested in this
< sipa> sonlin: people were trying to innovate long before bitcoin had any value. increased value brought economic interest in influencing development with all associated politics
< sipa> sonlin: as a developer, i believe it would strongly undermine trust in bitcoin as an independent decentralized currency
< sipa> if bitcoin core were to introduce such a rule, i hope the community would refuse to run it
< sipa> also, bitcoin developers don't set the rules
< sonlin> But i was told by the developers that are making dsd that basically all bitcoin devs would switch over at once.
< sipa> kanzure: now you give bitcoin developers an incentive to go pump those altcoins :p
< kanzure> sipa: what about altcoins distributing payments to bitcoin developers as part of their protocol definitions?
< kanzure> the funny thing is that altcoins should probably hard-code their developer subsidies to pay bitcoin developers, so that the bitcoin developers continue to work, since altcoins benefit mainly from that development activity, and that subsidy doesn't interfere with the bitcoin protocol definition. however, iirc, developers in the past have said they would not touch any of those subsidy payments anyway.
< sipa> and we all want bitcoin to progress, but i don't think you do that by radically changing its economics
< sonlin> I just want bitcoin to progress.
< sipa> how do bitcoin holders decide?
< sonlin> Bitcoin holders and a combination of other methods.
< GitHub6> [bitcoin] Christewart opened pull request #8469: [POC] Introducing property based testing to Core (master...rapidcheck) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8469

2016-08-05

< paveljanik> cfields, self-assing: good catch. Look like I do not even understand the original code 8) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/net.h#L289
< NicolasDorier> jtimon: I think we shoudl talk about that in ##libconsensus on my side I'm still not decided whther I prefer the one flag approach of my approach (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8339/commits/a59f79dfb7a996e9b309aa43d699499339b1a7c4)
< GitHub14> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8468: Do not shadow member variables in serialization (master...20160805_Wshadow_serialization) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8468
< GitHub153> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8467: [Trivial] Do not shadow members in dbwrapper (master...20160805_Wshadow_dbwrapper) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8467
< jtimon> thoughts on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/master...jtimon:0.13-consensus-flags?expand=1 NicolasDorier btcdrak sipa should I open a PR?
< GitHub185> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8466: [Trivial] Do not shadow variables in networking code (master...20160805_Wshadow_net) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8466
< GitHub178> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8465: [0.13] Document reindexing changes (0.13...docreindex) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8465
< bsm117532> wizkid057, the exploding bitcoin spammer, somehow got op permissions on #bitcoin-wizards and is banning people. Can someone here take care of him?
< GitHub47> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin opened pull request #8464: "Lockfree" Checkqueue Implementation (master...lockfree-checkqueue-squashed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8464
< GitHub149> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8463: [qt] Remove Priority from coincontrol dialog (master...Mf1608-qtPrio) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8463
< GitHub188> [bitcoin] Mirobit opened pull request #8462: Move AdvertiseLocal debug output to net category (master...advertiselocal) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8462
< GitHub89> [bitcoin] Mirobit closed pull request #8283: Move AdvertiseLocal debug output to net category (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8283
< GitHub83> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #7865: [RPC] Add bumpfee command. (master...2016/04/rbf_combined) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7865
< gmaxwell> luke-jr: nothing held back blocksizes from growing from 250k to 1mb... not even the defaults in bitcoin core-- or large increases in orphaning rates.
< luke-jr> if they care about Bitcoin (but not per se enough to research their own opinion on block size limits), they should follow recommendations to set it lower.

2016-08-04

< GitHub92> [bitcoin] jlopp opened pull request #8461: document return value of networkhashps for getmininginfo RPC endpoint (master...rpcMiningHelp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8461
< GitHub193> [bitcoin] NicolasDorier opened pull request #8460: parametrize buried soft fork in regtest and refactor (master...buriedsf) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8460
< NicolasDorier> jtimon, I will soon make a PR similar to https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/6f98197634026e740a9172405386b15c3a79b5a5 along with another change to parametize buriedsf height for regtest
< jtimon> well, maybe the time for https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/6f98197634026e740a9172405386b15c3a79b5a5 is whenever bip113 activation is simplified from bip9 in the same way
< jtimon> if we knew we weren't doing it, we could have made https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/6f98197634026e740a9172405386b15c3a79b5a5 without bip34 directly in #8391...
< morcos> NicolasDorier: See this comment from sdaftuar: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8391#issuecomment-237584871
< NicolasDorier> I have a code question: I'm working on a commit similar to one from jtimon, he is removing one check here https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/compare/remove-ism...consensus-post-remove-ism#diff-7ec3c68a81efff79b6ca22ac1f1eabbaL2353 about BIP30, does somebody know if it is actually safe to do so ?
< luke-jr> #bitcoin-dev is also fairly quiet
< GitHub10> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8459: [0.13] release-notes: Do not encourage changing blockmaxsize to blockmaxweight (0.13...0.13_relnotes_remove_bad_advice) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8459
< GitHub168> [bitcoin] luke-jr closed pull request #8458: [0.13] release notes: remove bad advice to switch to blockmaxweight prematurely (master...0.13_relnotes_remove_bad_advice) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8458
< GitHub107> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8458: [0.13] release notes: remove bad advice to switch to blockmaxweight prematurely (master...0.13_relnotes_remove_bad_advice) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8458
< jonasschnelli> Yes. Maybe https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8438 + SW0.13 downgrade compatibility is worth a week delay
< * sipa> notes that we're only 3 days past the date in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7679
< jonasschnelli> ACK, I can live with https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8438 for 0.13.1 but don't know about others opinions.
< jonasschnelli> sipa: do you think https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8438 can wait for 0.13.1?
< kanzure> this isn't short-term development related but it's high signal-noise crypto content that a few developers recently participated in, http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/2016-july-bitcoin-developers-miners-meeting/dan-boneh/
< gmaxwell> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr btcdrak sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier
< wumpus> bitcoin is always without gmp
< GitHub127> bitcoin/0.13 114f7e9 MarcoFalke: Merge #8454: [0.13.1] Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior...
< GitHub182> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8454: [0.13.1] Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior (0.13...Mf1608-qaFeeFilter013) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8454
< GitHub127> bitcoin/0.13 cd0910b Suhas Daftuar: Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior...
< GitHub127> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d485a6c5a8d2...114f7e944b1c
< cfields> sipa: default passed down from bitcoin
< GitHub160> [bitcoin] pedrobranco opened pull request #8457: Add block height support in rpc call getblock (master...feature/add-get-block-by-number) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8457
< GitHub198> [bitcoin] mrbandrews opened pull request #8456: [RPC] Simplified bumpfee command. (master...ba-rpcbumpfee) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8456
< GitHub71> bitcoin/0.13 d485a6c Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Add list of new and removed RPC commands to release notes...
< GitHub71> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/d485a6c5a8d238cac5ad732ce9e744f4b121143c
< GitHub129> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8454: [0.13.1] Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior (0.13...Mf1608-qaFeeFilter013) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8454
< GitHub87> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8444: Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior (master...fix-feefilter-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8444
< GitHub189> bitcoin/master 6e6ab2c Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8444: Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior...
< GitHub189> bitcoin/master 2c517b3 Suhas Daftuar: Fix p2p-feefilter.py for changed tx relay behavior
< GitHub189> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f97d335942ae...6e6ab2c32382
< GitHub154> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8392: Fix several node initialization issues (master...fixactivatewait) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8392
< GitHub46> bitcoin/master 9d4eb9a Pieter Wuille: Do diskspace check before import thread is started
< GitHub46> bitcoin/master aa59f2e Pieter Wuille: Add extra message to avoid a long 'Loading banlist'
< GitHub46> bitcoin/master 0fd2a33 Pieter Wuille: Use a signal to continue init after genesis activation
< GitHub46> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/37d83bb0a980...f97d335942ae
< GitHub105> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8391: Consensus: Remove ISM (master...remove-ism) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8391
< GitHub18> bitcoin/master 37d83bb Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8391: Consensus: Remove ISM...
< GitHub18> bitcoin/master 122786d NicolasDorier: Consensus: Remove ISM
< GitHub18> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/5c7a5e1f66d8...37d83bb0a980
< GitHub30> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #8453: Bring secp256k1 subtree up to date with master (master...2016_08_update_secp256k1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8453
< sipa> there are certainly no regressions known that would make the current master less appropriate than the subtree in bitcoin currently
< GitHub106> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8452: Code simplification: inline CTxInWitness inside CTxIn (master...segwitinline) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8452
< GitHub184> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8451: Get rid of the const field in CTransaction (master...noconsttx) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8451

2016-08-03

< GitHub42> [bitcoin] pstratem opened pull request #8450: Remove rpc_wallet_tests.cpp (master...2016-08-03-remove-rpc-wallet-tests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8450
< GitHub139> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8449: [Trivial] Do not shadow local variable, cleanup (master...20160803_shadow_blockencodings) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8449
< GitHub43> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8316: [qa] feefilter: Clear mempool after each check (master...Mf1607-qafeefilter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8316
< GitHub152> bitcoin/0.13 b8b97c9 fanquake: [doc] Increase recommended memory in gitian build guide...
< GitHub152> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/b8b97c98e86f81cd11a3c582dcea1c201139f187
< GitHub39> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8439: [doc] Increase recommended memory in gitian build guide (master...gitian-guide-3000) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8439
< GitHub177> bitcoin/master 5c7a5e1 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8439: [doc] Increase recommended memory in gitian build guide...
< GitHub177> bitcoin/master 7fdbce9 fanquake: [doc] Increase recommended memory in gitian build guide
< GitHub177> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/194110fb911d...5c7a5e1f66d8
< GitHub195> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7914: [qa] Add optional unique coinbase generation (master...coinbase) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7914
< GitHub12> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7886: QA test fix: ensure unique coinbase transactions (master...rpctest_unique_coinbases) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7886
< GitHub171> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7568: Corrections to bad-chain alert triggering (master...fix_bad_chain_alert_trigger) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7568
< GitHub180> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8189: rename mapAddrCount to mapNetGroupNodes (master...mapAddrCounts) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8189
< GitHub171> bitcoin/master 657fc19 instagibbs: rename mapAddrCount to mapNetGroupNodes
< GitHub171> bitcoin/master 194110f Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8189: rename mapAddrCount to mapNetGroupNodes...
< GitHub171> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ced2d5ef7c3b...194110fb911d