do you know if src/qt/res/bitcoin-qt-res.rc can use PRODUCT_NAME?
jonasschnelli: re isolating "Bitcoin Core" to fewer places.. there's 8 instances in the .ui files; I could move those to the equivalent .cpp, but it would look not-so-nice in Designer; thoughts?
let's rename to Nucleul Bitcoin in all languages. it sounds nicer.
nucleul sounded after a reasonable Bitcoin wallet name...:-)
jonasschnelli_: hehe in Dutch it's called "Bitcoin Kern"
Maybe my lol was inappropriate (I thought he is using a different wallet (Nucleul Bitcoin versiunea v0.11.0 (32-bit)), but looks like core. Could be that the user really face an issue/bug.
AFAIK bitcoin core is the only wallet thats ever supported priority on the send side, and it's never even optimized for using priority wisely.
gmaxwell, using this argument, this calls for a lot of NEW users to bitcoin to call for "restart" of the network...
Luke-Jr, either fees become a significant portion of the total block reward and miners acting in their own self interest ignore priority, or we have massively misjudged the economic rational for mining and bitcoin will fail
believe it or not, most miners *do* care to some degree about Bitcoin's success
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #7149: Bugfix: Correctly calculate priority when inputs are mined after dependent transactions enter the memory pool (master...bugfix_priority) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7149
anything else is harmful to Bitcoin
morcos: if everything in bitcoin was rational, nobody would have started using it