2016-11-18

< rabidus> you would kill the "store of value" property of bitcoin
< dermoth> I think after a certain number of bitcoin cycles (210k blocks) we could scavenge all unspent coins from the oldest 210k block, put them in a pool and let miners siphon 1/210000th of that pool every block. At that point the older part of the chain could be completely dropped as it would no longer have any use, and pooling the fund would ensure miners get a predictable reward.
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9183: Final Preparation for main.cpp Split (master...net_processing_5) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9183
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt reopened pull request #8930: Move orphan processing to ActivateBestChain (master...net_processing_3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8930
< * jtimon> re-asks for review on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8855
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9014 | Fix block-connection performance regression by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9014 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

2016-11-17

< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] mruddy opened pull request #9180: WIP: remove script checking dependency on checkpoints v2 (master...isburied) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9180
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #9179: Set DEFAULT_LIMITFREERELAY = 0 kB/minute (master...Mf1611-blockFreeTxs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9179
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt reopened pull request #9014: Fix block-connection performance regression (master...2016-10-fix-tx-regression) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9014
< BlueMatt> jtimon/sipa do we care about https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9075/files#r88568772 ?
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/707 | Implement BIP 14 : separate protocol version from client version by gavinandresen · Pull Request #707 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< meownow> oops, this pull request: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/63
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9142 | Move -salvagewallet, -zap(wtx) to where they belong by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #9142 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #9075: Decouple peer-processing-logic from block-connection-logic (#3) (master...net_processing_4) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9075
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master ae22357 Matt Corallo: Replace CValidationState param in ProcessNewBlock with BlockChecked
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7c98ce5 Matt Corallo: Remove pfrom parameter from ProcessNewBlock...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e2e069d Matt Corallo: Revert "RPC: Give more details when "generate" fails"...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/a8b2a82618be...9346f8429957
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] mruddy closed pull request #9175: WIP: remove script checking dependency on checkpoints (master...script_check) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9175
< wumpus> many people only use their bitcoin wallet with wifi so could care less about bandwidth usage
< wumpus> we're just nopt using BIP37 for the light wallet mode in bitcoin core. If you want to use it in your wallet go ahead.
< gmaxwell> Chris_Stewart_5: besides, fetching blocks is 14kb/s ongoing (28kb/s perhaps soon)-- most people running bitcoin core can handle that without batting an eye.
< gmaxwell> jonasschnelli: political discussion to ##bitcoin.
< jonasschnelli> sipa: \o/ new navigation on http://bitcoin.sipa.be
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9171 | Introduce auxiliary block requests by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #9171 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9075 | Decouple peer-processing-logic from block-connection-logic (#3) by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9075 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9014 | Fix block-connection performance regression by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9014 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9075 | Decouple peer-processing-logic from block-connection-logic (#3) by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9075 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9171 | Introduce auxiliary block requests by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #9171 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7729 | An error has occurred and has been logged. Please contact this bot's administrator for more information.
< MarcoFalke_web> #action look at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729
< gmaxwell> "Bitcoin developers oppose accountability."
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7729 | An error has occurred and has been logged. Please contact this bot's administrator for more information.
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7729 | An error has occurred and has been logged. Please contact this bot's administrator for more information.
< wumpus> so I proposed a label API to replace accounts at the start of this year, it still hasn't had much review yet: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729
< jonasschnelli> sipa: have a look at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8745
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9125 | Make CBlock a vector of shared_ptr of CTransactions by sipa · Pull Request #9125 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8589 | Inline CTxInWitness inside CTxIn (on top of #8580) by sipa · Pull Request #8589 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8580 | Make CTransaction actually immutable by sipa · Pull Request #8580 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9125 | Make CBlock a vector of shared_ptr of CTransactions by sipa · Pull Request #9125 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gmaxwell> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr btcdrak sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier
< Chris_Stewart_5> I guess my real question is could 'F' in the examples be a LOW_S sig https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0146.mediawiki#examples
< Chris_Stewart_5> and if so, how can this fail immediately without checking the signature: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/35fe0393f216aa6020fc929272118eade5628636/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L880
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a8b2a82 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9156: Add compile and link options echo to configure...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9156: Add compile and link options echo to configure (master...2016/11/configure) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9156
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master d8274bc Jonas Schnelli: Add compile and link options echo to configure
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/aaca05c0dabd...a8b2a82618be
< Chris_Stewart_5> I get why we have all the other checks inside of CheckSignatureEncoding: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/35fe0393f216aa6020fc929272118eade5628636/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L185
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9178: Doxygen: Set PROJECT_NAME = "Bitcoin Core" (master...Mf1611-doc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9178
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa63ee8 MarcoFalke: Doxygen: Set PROJECT_NAME = "Bitcoin Core"
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master aaca05c Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9178: Doxygen: Set PROJECT_NAME = "Bitcoin Core"...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f6db48ad1c8f...aaca05c0dabd
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #9178: Doxygen: Set PROJECT_NAME = "Bitcoin Core" (master...Mf1611-doc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9178
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Christewart closed pull request #9174: Modifying incorrect comments from BIP66 -> BIP62 (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9174
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master f6db48a Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8838: Calculate size and weight of block correctly in CreateNewBlock()...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5f274a1 jnewbery: log block size and weight correctly.
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/cb2ed300a89e...f6db48ad1c8f
<@wumpus> what is the proper way to pass arguments to the secp256k1 configure script that is invoked by bitcoin's?
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #9177: NOMERGE: WIP: Support block signed custom testchains (master...0.13-blocksign) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9177
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #9176: Globals: Pass Consensus::Params through CBlockTreeDB::LoadBlockIndexGuts() (master...0.13-chainparams-loadblockindexguts) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9176
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] mruddy opened pull request #9175: remove script checking dependency on checkpoints (master...script_check) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9175
< luke-jr> #bitcoin is the support channel btw
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Christewart opened pull request #9174: Modifying incorrect comments from BIP66 -> BIP62 (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9174
< shangzhou> bitcoin.org's download link.
< shangzhou> gmaxwell: i did some search this morning at baidu. Searched "c1726ccc50635795c942c7d7e51d979c4f83a3d17f8982e9d02a114a15fef419" only one result (a thread http://8btc.com/thread-41510-1-5.html) someone use Avast complain that bitcoin 0.13.1 win exe downloaded from bitcoin.org was blocked by the avast. Search something like "bitcoin 0.13.1 win exe" top one is
< BlueMatt> -rw------- 1 matt matt 1.7T Nov 16 16:44 /home/matt/.bitcoin/debug.log

2016-11-16

< Chris_Stewart_5> Why does this test fail for EVAL_FALSE and not WITNESS_PROGRAM_MISMATCH? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/test/data/script_tests.json#L1257
< theymos> fyi, some apparently-popular antivirus is flagging Bitcoin Core 0.13.1: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/c1726ccc50635795c942c7d7e51d979c4f83a3d17f8982e9d02a114a15fef419/analysis/
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #9173: demo (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9173
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] demodun opened pull request #9173: demo (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9173
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj reopened pull request #8747: [rpc] Fix transaction size comments and RPC help text. (master...rpc_comments) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8747
<@wumpus> or original VT-100 terminals or whatnot :) bitcoin isn't that old
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9166 | listtransactions returns invalid JSON when comment contain non-UTF8 special chars · Issue #9166 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<@wumpus> and that is how everyone uses it. We're not going to support non-UTF-8 JSON in bitcoin core.
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7940 | [WIP] Fuzzing framework by pstratem · Pull Request #7940 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jonasschnelli> BLTS: maybe #bitcoin or #bitcoin-dev but not #bitcoin-core-dev I guess
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #9172: Resurrect pstratem's "Simple fuzzing framework" (master...2016_11_fuzzing_framework) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9172
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master cb2ed30 MarcoFalke: Merge #9155: [trivial] update comments for tx weight...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #9155: [trivial] update comments for tx weight (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9155
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 07ede5d Brian Deery: update comments for tx weight
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0a6d48d9ed60...cb2ed300a89e
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8747: [rpc] Fix transaction size comments and RPC help text. (master...rpc_comments) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8747
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #9168: [qa] add assert_raises_message to check specific error message (master...ba-assert-raises) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9168
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 307acdd mrbandrews: [qa] add assert_raises_message to check specific error message
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0a6d48d MarcoFalke: Merge #9168: [qa] add assert_raises_message to check specific error message...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/434e683f7be6...0a6d48d9ed60
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #9171: Introduce out-of-band block requests (master...2016/11/spv_step_1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9171
<@wumpus> CubicEarth: this is not a channel for general bitcoin related questions, please use #bitcoin
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9133: Unset fImporting for loading mempool (master...noImportLoadMempool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9133
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 79f755d Alex Morcos: Unset fImporting for loading mempool
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 434e683 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9133: Unset fImporting for loading mempool...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/62af16463833...434e683f7be6
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9131: fNetworkActive is not protected by a lock, use an atomic (master...2016/11/net_toggle) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9131
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 079142b Jonas Schnelli: fNetworkActive is not protected by a lock, use an atomic
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 62af164 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9131: fNetworkActive is not protected by a lock, use an atomic...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/4333b1c4ea74...62af16463833
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9151: [qa] proxy_test: Calculate hardcoded port numbers (master...Mf1611-qaPort) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9151
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 4333b1c Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9151: [qa] proxy_test: Calculate hardcoded port numbers...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa80ef8 MarcoFalke: [qa] proxy_test: Calculate hardcoded port numbers instead
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/918ea16dc08d...4333b1c4ea74
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9169: build: fix qt5.7 build under macOS (master...fix-objcxx-std) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9169
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 70266e9 Cory Fields: build: fix qt5.7 build under macOS...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 918ea16 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9169: build: fix qt5.7 build under macOS...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6eeac6e30d65...918ea16dc08d
< jonasschnelli> sipa: come one! s/hash rate</a></li>/hash rate</a></li><li class="hilight"><a accesskey="h" href="http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ver9-10k.png">ver9-10k</a></li>/
< sipa> gmaxwell: http://bitcoin.sipa.be
< gmaxwell> for bitcoin I do think we need DRD run on it more often, it's just a bit frustrating because its so slow.
<@wumpus> bitcoin: where even the configure scripts yell at you
< * luke-jr> cowers in fear of the new Bitcoin Core configure that yells at you :P

2016-11-15

< cfields> morcos: top two commits here: https://github.com/theuni/bitcoin/commits/prevector-move
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9125 | Make CBlock a vector of shared_ptr of CTransactions by sipa · Pull Request #9125 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< cfields> morcos: assuming bitcoin-qt build succeeds after that, then yes, that's enough
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] theuni opened pull request #9169: build: fix qt5.7 build under macOS (master...fix-objcxx-std) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9169
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] mrbandrews opened pull request #9168: [qa] add assert_raises_message to check specific error message (master...ba-assert-raises) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9168
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #9167: IsAllFromMe (master...IsAllFromMe) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9167
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8589 | Inline CTxInWitness inside CTxIn (on top of #8580) by sipa · Pull Request #8589 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< timothy> drizzt@liara ~ % bitcoin-cli listtransactions '*' 2
< thermoman> jonasschnelli, luke-jr: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9166
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] instagibbs opened pull request #9165: [trivial] SendMoney: use already-calculated balance (master...triv-curbal) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9165
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #9164: [trivial] credit values are CAmount (master...intcredit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9164
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 6eeac6e Pieter Wuille: Merge #9164: [trivial] credit values are CAmount...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 20c3215 Gregory Sanders: credit values are CAmount
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/018a4eb120dc...6eeac6e30d65
< jonasschnelli> Now testing bitcoin-cli
< thermoman> bitcoin-cli says can't parse reply
< jonasschnelli> This one is easy to review if someone has 2-3 minutes of boringness: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9142
< sdaftuar> thrasher`: i don't know where that test case came from, but i do recall this github comment that may be of help: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5620#issuecomment-69351549
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] instagibbs opened pull request #9164: [trivial] credit values are CAmount (master...intcredit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9164
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master f54e460 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9132: Make strWalletFile const...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9132: Make strWalletFile const (master...2016/11/strWalletFile_const) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9132
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master f734505 Jonas Schnelli: Make strWalletFile const
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/770364b8eaf7...f54e4605fc31
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9160: [trivial] Fix hungarian variable name (master...hungarian) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9160
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 770364b Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9160: [trivial] Fix hungarian variable name...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master ec34648 Russell Yanofsky: [trivial] Fix hungarian variable name...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b42291334651...770364b8eaf7
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8831 | Replace CWalletDB::ReadKeyValue with CWallet::LoadKeyValue by pstratem · Pull Request #8831 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< achow101> Squidicuz: yes, bitcoincore.org is Bitcoin Core's site
< shinyg> Maybe bitcoin is a software stack but Core is just software
< shinyg> makes sense, how about is Bitcoin Core a Solution stack or software as some describe it/
< achow101> they're trying to separate bitcoin core from bitcoin.org as bitcoin.org is for bitcoin in general whilst bitcoin core is a specific project
< sipa> but bitcoin core has its own project website now
< shinyg> so was there a specific reason why new releases stopped coming from bitcoin.org?
< achow101> well they're listed here: https://bitcoin.org/en/about-us#sponsorship

2016-11-14

< achow101> also, IIRC bitcoin.org and the bitcoin foundation are no longer related
< achow101> shinyg: blockstream does not fund Bitcoin Core development at all. There are developers who work on Bitcoin Core who also have jobs at Blockstream. The people who actually partially fund development are the MIT DCI who actually pay some people to work on Core (wladimir, cory)
< shinyg> I have recently expanded the Wikipedia article for Bitcoin Core by a factor of 10. Could someone spend just a few minutes to see if there are any major ommission or errors?
< shinyg> Hi people, I was after a little assistance from those who know more about Bitcoin Core and those who support Wikipedia.
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #9136: sync_blocks cleanup (master...sync-clean) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9136
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7943b13 Russell Yanofsky: [qa] Avoid 2 list comprehensions in sync_blocks
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 05e57cc Russell Yanofsky: [qa] Fix sync_blocks timeout argument...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fd6bb70 Russell Yanofsky: [qa] Improve sync_blocks error messages.
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/924745dd6f5f...b42291334651
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #9160: [trivial] Fix hungarian variable name (master...hungarian) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9160
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #9159: [qa] Wait for specific block announcement in p2p-compactblocks (master...cmpct-announce-wait) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9159
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8580 | Make CTransaction actually immutable by sipa · Pull Request #8580 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9125 | Make CBlock a vector of shared_ptr of CTransactions by sipa · Pull Request #9125 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Leviathn closed pull request #9158: Removal of "free transaction" logic from codebase (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9158
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Leviathn opened pull request #9158: Removal of "free transaction" logic from codebase (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9158
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #9156: Add compile and link options echo to configure (master...2016/11/configure) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9156
< gmaxwell> okay, bitcoin's sha256 is 237.1 million bytes per second, openssl is 320.7 million bytes per second.. and the chacha is 358.6 million bytes per second. (openssl at slight disadvantage due to 8k vs 1m size, but it doesn't matter much)
< btcdrak> gmaxwell: no no, we're not allowed to sign that, because it's Roger Ver's attempt to snub Bitcoin Core. Looks like a more watered down version of the first leak http://pastebin.com/cgkqcWBS.
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa42e4a MarcoFalke: [qt] Make network disabled icon 50% opaque
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 924745d Jonas Schnelli: Merge #9145: [qt] Make network disabled icon 50% opaque...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #9145: [qt] Make network disabled icon 50% opaque (master...Mf1611-qtNetworkIcon) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9145
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/87ab49e4fe38...924745dd6f5f
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] carryforward opened pull request #9155: [trivial] update comments for tx weight (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9155
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #9154: Add recent checkpoints to remove CPU load during sync (master...f/new-checkpoints) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9154
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] XertroV opened pull request #9154: Add recent checkpoints to remove CPU load during sync (master...f/new-checkpoints) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9154

2016-11-13

< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #9152: Wallet/RPC: sweepprivkeys method to scan UTXO set and send to local wallet (master...sweepprivkeys) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9152
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr closed pull request #9150: Qt: Make network disabled icon larger and 50% opaque (master...gui_netdisabled_icon_enlarge) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9150
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #9151: [qa] proxy_test: Calculate hardcoded port numbers (master...Mf1611-qaPort) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9151
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #9150: Qt: Make network disabled icon larger and 50% opaque (master...gui_netdisabled_icon_enlarge) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9150
< fanquake> Sure, this list will show you the current "big" changes for the 0.14.0 release: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/milestone/21
< fanquake> Victorsueca If you'd just like to test stuff in general, start here : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AWindows . See if you can recreate/investigate issues. If so post some info about the system your using, how you tested it etc.

2016-11-12

< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9148 | Wallet RPCs can return stale info due to ProcessNewBlock Race · Issue #9148 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #9145: [qt] Make network disabled icon 50% opaque (master...Mf1611-qtNetworkIcon) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9145
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #9144: [Trivial] Correct waitforblockheight example help text (master...rpc-commands) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9144
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #9143: Refactor ZapWalletTxes to avoid layer vialotions (master...2016/11/wallet_db_refactoring_1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9143
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #9142: Move -salvagewallet, -zap(wtx) to where they belong (master...2016/11/wallet_init) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9142
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #9141: Remove unnecessary calls to CheckFinalTx (master...2016/11/istrusted) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9141
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr closed pull request #8388: [0.13] mining: Optimise for typical mining use with blockmaxsize (0.13...blockmaxsize_opti-0.13) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8388
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr closed pull request #7534: Minimal RPC & wallet support for CLTV-enabled multisig addresses (master...cltv_address) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7534
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #9140: Bugfix: Correctly replace generated headers and fail cleanly (master...bugfix_genheaders) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9140

2016-11-11

< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #9139: Change sync_blocks to pick smarter maxheight (master...sync-height) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9139
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] morcos closed pull request #9123: Remove extraneous LogPrint from fee estimation (master...eliminateFeeWarning) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9123
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #9138: Improve fee estimation (master...refactorFeeEstimation) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9138
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #9137: WIP: Allow wallet key import RPCs to track TxOut amounts on -prune nodes (master...import-pruned) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9137
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #9136: sync_blocks cleanup (master...sync-clean) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9136
< GoogleHater> My Bitcoin Core does not finding *.onion peers.
< GoogleHater> Why speed limit isn't implemented in Bitcoin Core?
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #9133: Unset fImporting for loading mempool (master...noImportLoadMempool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9133
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #9131: fNetworkActive is not protected by a lock, use an atomic (master...2016/11/net_toggle) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9131
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8456 | [RPC] Simplified bumpfee command. by mrbandrews · Pull Request #8456 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< fanquake> One thing I wanted you to take a look at this this diff generated by your diff-tool -> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8808#issuecomment-259657066 , the bottom change seems to significant to be part of the PR.
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9100 | tx_valid: re-order inputs to how they are encoded by dcousens · Pull Request #9100 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #9130: Mention the new network toggle functionality in the tooltip. (master...20161111_disable_network_tooltip) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9130
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9100 | tx_valid: re-order inputs to how they are encoded by dcousens · Pull Request #9100 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9124: Use better name for local variable to prevent -Wshadow compiler warning (master...20161110_Wshadow_benchcheckblock) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9124
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 87ab49e Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9124: Use better name for local variable to prevent -Wshadow compiler warning...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/bfc7aad00884...87ab49e4fe38
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master bf49f10 Pavel Janík: Use better name for local variable to prevent -Wshadow compiler warning
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9101 | [Wallet] Do not parse ssValue in CWalletDB::Recover by pstratem · Pull Request #9101 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9124 | Use better name for local variable to prevent -Wshadow compiler warning by paveljanik · Pull Request #9124 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8983 | WIP: Log block height and size when received by rebroad · Pull Request #8983 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<@wumpus> ooh capitalizing Bitcoin just now that internet is no longer going to be capitalized :)
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9064 | unify capitalization of "bitcoin address" by s-matthew-english · Pull Request #9064 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9115: Mention reporting security issues responsibly (master...20161109_secissues) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9115
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master bfc7aad Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9115: Mention reporting security issues responsibly...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7d1de30 Pavel Janík: Mention reporting security issues responsibly
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ab914a65301b...bfc7aad00884
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9115 | Mention reporting security issues responsibly by paveljanik · Pull Request #9115 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr closed pull request #8889: Qt/ModalOverlay: Use theme tooltip colours (master...overlay_theme) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8889
< jonasschnelli> Luke-Jr: how do we continue with https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8889? Close?
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #8996: Network activity toggle (master...networkactive) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8996
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 32efa79 Jon Lund Steffensen: Qt: Add GUI feedback and control of network activity state....
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e38993b Jon Lund Steffensen: RPC: Add "togglenetwork" method to toggle network activity temporarily...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7c9a98a Jon Lund Steffensen: Allow network activity to be temporarily suspended....
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli pushed 7 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/7977a1157a3a...ab914a65301b
<@wumpus> (where "upstream" is the name of your remote for bitcoin/bitcoin, big chance it is "origin" for you)
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9058: Fixes for p2p-compactblocks.py test timeouts on travis (#8842) (master...fix-8842-sync-timeouts) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9058
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master dac53b5 Russell Yanofsky: Modify getblocktxn handler not to drop requests for old blocks...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 55bfddc Russell Yanofsky: [qa] Fix stale data bug in test_compactblocks_not_at_tip...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 47e9659 Russell Yanofsky: [qa] Fix bug in compactblocks v2 merge...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/46027e8668ec...7977a1157a3a
< fanquake> Have a look at the github-merge script in this dir https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/contrib/devtools
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9113: Return the type when it's unknown instead of throwing an exception (master...ReturnNotThrow) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9113
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9112: Avoid ugly exception in log on unknown inv type (master...2016_11_invtype_debugging) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9112
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 46027e8 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9112: Avoid ugly exception in log on unknown inv type...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e9f25dd Wladimir J. van der Laan: Avoid ugly exception in log on unknown inv type...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/21e6c6b569c5...46027e8668ec
<@wumpus> phantomcircuit: jonasschnelli made such a tool https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8745 - but yeah that's out of scope
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9112 | Avoid ugly exception in log on unknown inv type by laanwj · Pull Request #9112 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jonasschnelli> For multiwallet, this PR is large but simple to review: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8764
<@wumpus> bumpfee needs to be on RPC first e.g. see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8456
< Victorsueca> wumpus: you mean that bitcoin core should have it's own random service like, for example, OpenPGP that uses other computationally intensive processes running on your system?
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9114: [depends] Set OSX_MIN_VERSION to 10.8 (master...depends-min-osx-10-8) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9114
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 21e6c6b Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9114: [depends] Set OSX_MIN_VERSION to 10.8...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 617c96d fanquake: [depends] Set OSX_MIN_VERSION to 10.8
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/71bc39eb7483...21e6c6b569c5
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #9129: One fDisconnect to rule them all (master...OnefDisconnect) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9129
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #9129: One fDisconnect to rule them all (master...OnefDisconnect) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9129
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] theuni opened pull request #9128: net: Decouple CConnman and message serialization (master...connman-send) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9128
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #9125: Make CBlock a vector of shared_ptr of CTransactions (master...sharedblock) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9125

2016-11-10

< sipa> you're free to ask questions about Bitcoin and Bitcoin Core's development model here
< Lauda> Oops wrong chat, thought this was #bitcoin. Sorry.
< MarcoFalke> FreeUser: The "Bitcoin Core Developers" is just the short version of all the credits (which you can find in the release notes)
< FreeUser> I can see "Bitcoin Core Developers" while loading Bitcoin Core.
< Chris_Stewart_5> Damn! I paid that guy all my doge coin for a bitcoin core dev sticker..
< gmaxwell> Perhaps you're a Bitcoin Core dev, have you submitted a patch? :)
< FreeUser> Official means from Bitcoin Core devs
< gmaxwell> whats a Bitcoin Core devs? there is no such thing as membership.
< sipa> Knots is a fork of Bitcoin Core, maintained by different people
< FreeUser> Is Bitcoin Knots an official wallet?
< FreeUser> How to disable alerts in old Bitcoin Core versions?
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #9124: Use better name for local variable to prevent -Wshadow compiler warning (master...20161110_Wshadow_benchcheckblock) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9124
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9058 | Fixes for p2p-compactblocks.py test timeouts on travis (#8842) by ryanofsky · Pull Request #9058 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9058 | Fixes for p2p-compactblocks.py test timeouts on travis (#8842) by ryanofsky · Pull Request #9058 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8550 | [Qt] Add interactive mempool graph by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #8550 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8501 | Add mempool statistics collector by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #8501 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jonasschnelli> petertodd: yes. 8501 can work without 8550 and has the most bitcoin-core wide impact.
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8501 | Add mempool statistics collector by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #8501 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8501 | Add mempool statistics collector by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #8501 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jonasschnelli> BlueMatt: yeah! Bumpfee should get some review. Guys! https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8456
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8776 | Wallet refactoring leading up to multiwallet by luke-jr · Pull Request #8776 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jonasschnelli> So.. theres a project: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/2
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #9123: Remove extraneous LogPrint from fee estimation (master...eliminateFeeWarning) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9123
< NicolasDorier> well bitcoin core has a wallet part
< sipa> bitcoin core has a perfectly good wallet
< btcdrak> Yeah I also think purespv seems wrong for Bitcoin Core.
< BlueMatt> I'm not sure if its worth the effort to make bitcoin core a competitive spv wallet - they mostly all already support connecting to a trusted node (though need auth)
<@wumpus> being able to use bitcoin core as a full SPV node would be useful, especially with a local node that does validate
< BlueMatt> wumpus: because if you're not gonna be upgrading to full trust model why are you running bitcoin core as a wallet?
< jonasschnelli> For those who haven seen it, there a full working PR for the hybrid SPV: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9076
< sipa> ok, "client mode" as bitcoin's creator called it then
<@wumpus> I think the idea has always been to have some kind of SPV mode in bitcoin core, yes
< jonasschnelli> I wanted to ask if we'd like to see some form of "SPV" (wrong term, i agree) mode in Bitcoin-Core, if it's worth to continue the work
<@wumpus> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr btcdrak sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier jl2012