< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8969 | Decouple peer-processing-logic from block-connection-logic (#2) by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #8969 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< GitHub2>
[bitcoin] instagibbs opened pull request #9073: Trivial: Add common failure cases for rpc server connection failure (master...rpcnoconnectstring) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9073
< GitHub52>
bitcoin/master fcf61b8 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9050: net: make a few values immutable, and use deterministic randomness for the localnonce...
< GitHub54>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9050: net: make a few values immutable, and use deterministic randomness for the localnonce (master...connman-const) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9050
< GitHub52>
bitcoin/master aff6584 Cory Fields: net: constify a few CNode vars to indicate that they're threadsafe
< GitHub52>
bitcoin/master 59ac5c5 Cory Fields: net: Use deterministic randomness for CNode's nonce, and make it const
< GitHub156>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9061: Ignore getheaders prior to passing all checkpoints. (master...FixGetheadersResponseWhenSyncing) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9061
< GitHub127>
[bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #9053: IBD using chainwork instead of height and not using header timestamps (master...no_checkpoint_for_ibd) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9053
< GitHub151>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #9069: Clean up bctest.py and bitcoin-util-test.py (master...btutiltestcleanup) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9069
< GitHub86>
bitcoin/master bae81b8 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8674: tools for analyzing, updating and adding copyright headers in source files...
< GitHub54>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8674: tools for analyzing, updating and adding copyright headers in source files (master...copyright-scripts) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8674
< GitHub86>
bitcoin/master 159597a isle2983: [devtools] script support for managing source file copyright headers...
< BlueMatt>
yes, wouldve been hilarious if that ended up in bitcoin
< GitHub77>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9063: Do not shadow variable, use deprecated MAP_ANON if MAP_ANONYMOUS is not defined (master...20161102_fix_lockedpool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9063
< GitHub68>
bitcoin/master f2a6e82 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9063: Do not shadow variable, use deprecated MAP_ANON if MAP_ANONYMOUS is not defined...
< GitHub68>
bitcoin/master 4a9f3c5 Pavel Janík: Do not shadow variable, use deprecated MAP_ANON if MAP_ANONYMOUS is not defined.
< GitHub123>
[bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #9063: Do not shadow variable, use deprecated MAP_ANON if MAP_ANONYMOUS is not defined (master...20161102_fix_lockedpool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9063
< gmaxwell>
achow101: using software bitcoin's creator wrote which has never been publically distributed.
< gmaxwell>
achow101: sounds fine to me more or less.. Perhaps "Warning: This is outdated and network-inconsistent software. Also, the alert system has been deprecated. Upgrade is strongly recommended. See https://bitcoin.org/alert-retirement"
< achow101>
so, how about "Warning: Network rules in this version are out of date. Additionally the Alert System has been deprecated. Upgrade is strongly recommended. See https://bitcoin.org/alert-retirement"
< achow101>
gmaxwell: so just make the message "Warning: This version is obsolete. The Alert System has been deprecated. Upgrade is strongly recommended. See: https://bitcoin.org/alert-retirement"
< BlueMatt>
bitcoin 0.10.4 released
< morcos>
theuni/bitcoin/copy-move
< GitHub45>
[bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #9058: Fixes for p2p-compactblocks.py test timeouts on travis (#8842) (master...fix-8842-sync-timeouts) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9058
< gmaxwell>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9053 < can someone trigger a rerun here? I'm pretty sure this change couldn't make test_bitcoin fail (and it passes locally.)
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9053 | IBD using chainwork instead of height and not using header timestamps by gmaxwell · Pull Request #9053 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< GitHub58>
[bitcoin] gmaxwell opened pull request #9053: IBD using chainwork instead of height and not using header timestamps (master...no_checkpoint_for_ibd) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9053
< GitHub141>
[bitcoin] gmaxwell opened pull request #9052: Use RelevantServices instead of node_network in AttemptToEvict. (master...prefer_relevant2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9052
2016-10-31
< BlueMatt>
I mean its easy...4 digit number starting with a # and link to github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issue/#
< GitHub106>
[bitcoin] theuni opened pull request #9050: net: make a few values immutible, and use deterministic randomness for the localnonce (master...connman-const) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9050
< GitHub112>
[bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9049: Remove duplicatble duplicate-input check from CheckTransaction (master...2016-10-bench-checkblock) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9049
< GitHub178>
[bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9045: Hash P2P messages as they are received instead of at process-time (master...2016-10-p2p-hash) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9045
< GitHub139>
[bitcoin] paveljanik closed pull request #8468: Do not shadow member variables in serialization (master...20160805_Wshadow_serialization) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8468
< GitHub107>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #9043: [qt] Return useful error message on ATMP failure (master...Mf1611-qtATMPerror) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9043
< GitHub141>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #9042: [rpc] ParseHash: Fail when length is not 64 (master...Mf1611-rpcParseHash64) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9042
< Victorsueca>
does bitcoin core support 64-bit POSIX time?
< GitHub115>
[bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #9039: Various serialization simplifcations and optimizations (master...simpleserial) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9039
2016-10-28
< GitHub166>
[bitcoin] EthanHeilman opened pull request #9037: net: Add test-before-evict discipline to addrman (master...test-before-evict) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9037
< ArtGravity>
Just the logo covering the "Bit" in Bitcoin Core
< ArtGravity>
in the 8043 screenshot, where it says Bitcoin Core - Wallet at the top left of the screen is where it should have the usual menus
< ArtGravity>
my icon appears where the B in Bitcoin Core is in the image on 8043
< BlueMatt>
I'd like to nominate https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9026 (well, a variant of it, because that is gonna end up adapting to some reorgs that are in-progress) for 0.13.2
< petertodd>
morcos: again, this is a scenario where bitcoin as you know it is horribly insecure - anyone with >10 machines could attack your min-diff chain. I had a high enough credit limit as a student to buy more machines than that. :)
< petertodd>
Chris_Stewart_5: yes, removiing is a hard fork, but remember we're talking about a situation where bitcoin as you know it is useless, so tha'ts irrelevant IMO
< petertodd>
jeremyrubin: yes, and at that point your idea of what bitcoin is is so insecure as to be useless
< petertodd>
wumpus: right, I mean, w/o the minimum diff thing, the effect would be no different than ensuring bitcoin core shipped with blockchain data
< petertodd>
note that from the point of view of consensus this is technically speaking no different than making bitcoin core come with a set of blockchain data
< BlueMatt>
Frederic94500: we're in the middle of a meeting, please go to #bitcoin
< Frederic94500>
#bitcoin If segwit doesn't activate, he will be activate to the next 2016 blocks?
< jtimon>
I'm still trying to test the blocksigning stuff, but the "custom chain" code that preceeds it is pretty much ready I think (feel free to test it and give suggestions), see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8994
<@wumpus>
or magnet:?xt=urn:btih:dbe48c446b1113890644bbef03e361269f69c49a&dn=bitcoin-core-0.13.1&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.publicbt.com%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.ccc.de%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org%3A6969&ws=https%3A%2F%2Fbitcoin.org%2Fbin%2F
< btcdrak>
achow101_: looks like everything has been done barring release notes and upload to bitcoin.org
< andytoshi>
kanzure: no, i have a rust json parsing library for bitcoin purposes, a low-priority TODO is for me to aggressively compare its behaviour to that of univalue
< GitHub174>
[bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #9030: Don't process blocktxns when we have the block already. (master...BlocktxnExits) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9030
< btcdrak>
wumpus: well we have tests that compare the json output of "./bitcoin-tx -json ..." with a json file. trailing white space can get trimmed by IDE/editor settings. Trailing white space has no place in a json file. If it wasnt for that nice "log errors as diff" patch to bitcoin-unit-test.py submitted yesterday I would have lost my mind.
< GitHub7>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9022: Update release notes to mention dropping OS X 10.7 support (0.13...0-13-1-osx-notes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9022
< gmaxwell>
here is the max from that data, BitClub -0.00042054 HaoBTC 0.03818631 BitFury 0.05457683 BTC.com 0.07372295 SlushPool 0.09595818 BTCC 0.09886828 ViaBTC 0.11170776 F2Pool 0.12080682 Bitcoin.com 0.12846755 AntPool 0.14341536 Unknown 0.16687057 BW.COM 0.18705609 GBMiners 0.24633568 Telco 0.709605 Eligius 1.03414
< GitHub114>
[bitcoin] sdaftuar opened pull request #9026: Fix handling of invalid compact blocks (master...fix-invalidcb-handling) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9026
< wumpus>
btcdrak: upstream to jgarzik/univalue, and we can merge it to bitcoin-core/univalue if that takes too long / is urgent
< GitHub151>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #9025: getrawtransaction should take a bool for verbose (master...getrawtransbool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9025
< wumpus>
that's slightly curious, maybe getrawtransaction author expected an 'even more verbose' format at some point and pass '2'? it'd have made sense for `getblock` and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8704
< GitHub197>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #9022: Update release notes to mention dropping OS X 10.7 support (0.13...0-13-1-osx-notes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9022
< GitHub119>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #9020: rpc: Remove invalid explanation from wallet fee message (master...2016_10_wallet_message) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9020
< blur3d>
Hey Core. Just a thank you message for your all your work. Keep doing what you guys are doing. Ignore the outside pressures, and keep bitcoin from becoming centeralised. All of the fear mongering ignores the simple fact that the bitcoin network would be near impossible to replicate from scratch. Any transitional periods may have some discomfort, but compromising the network for short term bandaides is for fools.
< GitHub60>
bitcoin/0.13 a32d7c2 Cory Fields: release: bump required osx version to 10.8. Credit jonasschnelli....