< GitHub20>
[bitcoin] EthanHeilman opened pull request #8282: net: Feeler connections to increase online addrs in the tried table. (master...feelers3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8282
< GitHub142>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #8281: qt: Remove client name from debug window (master...2016_06_qt_remove_client_name) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8281
< GitHub17>
[bitcoin] sdaftuar opened pull request #8280: Tests: Increase sync_blocks() timeouts in pruning.py (master...fix-pruning-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8280
< GitHub152>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8261: The bit field is shown only when status is "started" (master...20160625_sw_getblockchaininfo_bit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8261
< GitHub19>
bitcoin/master 3685e0c Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8261: The bit field is shown only when status is "started"...
< GitHub19>
bitcoin/master 2129fce Pavel Janík: The bit field is shown only when status is "started"
< GitHub195>
[bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #8272: Make the dummy argument to getaddednodeinfo optional (master...optionaladdnodedummy) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8272
< GitHub49>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8240: doc: Mention Windows XP end of support in release notes (master...2016_06_windows_xp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8240
< GitHub121>
bitcoin/master 63fbdbc Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8240: doc: Mention Windows XP end of support in release notes...
< GitHub121>
bitcoin/master b0be3a0 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Mention Windows XP end of support in release notes...
< gmaxwell>
probably depends on the hardware, on my laptop I think it's IO. on systems with faster IO, I think its cpu inside leveldb code... at least with default dbcache. with dbcache cranked, its likely cpu elsewhere in bitcoin.
< GitHub136>
[bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8261: The bit field is shown only when status is "started" (master...20160625_sw_getblockchaininfo_bit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8261
< Lauda>
gmaxwell all that is required is "dbcache=3000" in bitcoin.conf right (since mine is practically empty) and I want to run another reindex over night?
< GitHub139>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #8252: [trivial] Add aarch64 to depends .gitignore (master...depends-aarch-gitignore) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8252
2016-06-23
< gmaxwell>
There is a cellphone game called spaceteam where you have to call out instructions for other people to punch in to jointly fly a fictional spacecraft. Manually setting consensus normative flags in bitcoin makes me think of spaceteam.
< gmaxwell>
I can tell you that a lot of bitcoin services have no reorg handling at all. :(
< gmaxwell>
jtimon: yes, and a seperate network that used just that and was otherwise the same as bitcoin testnet
< gmaxwell>
Bitcoin tx fees were too high for them, so they only use bitcoin for periodic commitments and they use testnet as a messaging flooding network.
< gmaxwell>
And the release cycle distinction we make for bitcoin is that consensus consistency changes are base, mandatory, functionality-- not software features (though sometimes some features must ride along with them)
<@wumpus>
re: launching testnet it would be useful if the windows installer created a Bitcoin Core (Testnet) link in the menu too, which does nothing but launch bitcoin-qt with -testnet flag. I have no idea how to do that though
<@wumpus>
it may be the windows machine I'm testing on is just crappy, I also had a strange issue with ldb files: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8250 .. possible that the disk is just very slow due to other processes interfering
< GitHub1>
[bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #8242: Check if the macro PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG was expanded. (master...20160622_check_pkg-config) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8242
< GitHub86>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #8240: doc: Mention Windows XP end of support in release notes (master...2016_06_windows_xp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8240
< GitHub183>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8233: Mention Linux ARM executables in release process and notes (master...2016_06_release_process_arm) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8233
< GitHub170>
bitcoin/master 06f40ef Wladimir J. van der Laan: depends: Mention aarch64 as common cross-compile target
< GitHub170>
bitcoin/master 05f64c9 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Mention Linux ARM builds in release notes
< GitHub170>
bitcoin/master b7bf037 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Mention ARM executables in release process...
< GitHub92>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8231: [Qt] fix a bug where the SplashScreen will not be hidden during startup (master...2016/06/qt_min_fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8231
< GitHub115>
bitcoin/master b3e1348 Jonas Schnelli: [Qt] fix a bug where the SplashScreen will not be hidden during startup
< GitHub115>
bitcoin/master 760a6c7 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8231: [Qt] fix a bug where the SplashScreen will not be hidden during startup...
< gribble>
maaku was last seen in #bitcoin-core-dev 6 weeks, 4 days, 1 hour, 19 minutes, and 54 seconds ago: <maaku> yeah but still, we should try not to add to the noise
< GitHub127>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8229: [Doc] Update OS X build notes for 10.11 SDK (master...osx-build-notes-new) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8229
< GitHub30>
bitcoin/master 8ccdac1 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8229: [Doc] Update OS X build notes for 10.11 SDK...
< GitHub30>
bitcoin/master e5a680d fanquake: [Doc] Update OS X build notes for 10.11 SDK
< sipa>
wumpus: there is the abcore project, which uses the arch or debian built arm binaries for bitcoin core on android
< GitHub137>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #8233: Mention Linux ARM executables in release process and notes (master...2016_06_release_process_arm) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8233
< GitHub95>
[bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #8231: [Qt] fix a bug where the SplashScreen will not be hidden during startup (master...2016/06/qt_min_fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8231
< GitHub198>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8216: [qa] assert 'changePosition out of bounds' (master...Mf1606-qaFundrawtransaction) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8216
< jl2012>
so we could have a locked_in just with only standard Bitcoin Core 0.12.1 blocks
< jl2012>
I think it'd be better if they change it before 419328. Otherwise, if they keep signalling 0x20000001 after 419328, Bitcoin Core clients will think there is an unknown softfork
2016-06-20
< btcdrak>
prolly should be asking in #bitcoin or #bitcoin-dev
< gmaxwell>
rubensayshi: probably your time would be better spent helping to get counterparty onto it's own network instead of trying to steganographically hide data in Bitcoin transactions.
< gmaxwell>
rubensayshi: no version of bitcoin core will ever create bare multisig outputs.
< GitHub70>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8179: Evict orphans which are included or precluded by accepted blocks. (master...reap_orphans) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8179
< GitHub79>
bitcoin/master 11cc143 Gregory Maxwell: Adds an expiration time for orphan tx....
< GitHub79>
bitcoin/master db0ffe8 Gregory Maxwell: This eliminates the primary leak that causes the orphan map to...
< GitHub79>
bitcoin/master 1b0bcc5 Pieter Wuille: Track orphan by prev COutPoint rather than prev hash
<@wumpus>
Chris_Stewart_5: I have no experience with it either, if you can apply it to improve test coverage of bitcoin core, why not try it
< Chris_Stewart_5>
sipa: Do you have any thoughts on property based checking? I'm starting to integrate it into a library I'm writing and it seems it would be useful in Bitcoin Core. I was looking at this library for C++
< petertodd>
GreenIsMyPepper: yeah, the tl;dr: is Lightning means if Bitcoin breaks, we have deadlines to fix it or all hell breaks loose
< gmaxwell>
Chris_Stewart_5: going back to your earlier comments, per the lifecycle, changes for network consensus exist outside of the bitcoin core release cycle, the reason we're talking about segwit merge in master here is not so much related to deploying segwit in the network, but related to managing the code implementing segwit in core as part of master. This is important to us because of the overhead
< petertodd>
GreenIsMyPepper: it's ok for a bit, but given a sufficiently long period of empty blocks being mined eventually lightning users are really screwed over; that's not true for other ways of using Bitcoin
<@wumpus>
consensus changes are not on bitcoin core's major release schedule, the first release introducing segwit would ideally be 0.12.x
< petertodd>
so, I'd strongly suggest we at least get in my global optin setting, so that people who need RBF can easily use external scripts to do so: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7132
< GitHub171>
bitcoin/master 0a64777 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8208: Do not set extra flags for unfiltered DNS seed results...
< GitHub118>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8208: Do not set extra flags for unfiltered DNS seed results (master...simplerservices) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8208
< GitHub171>
bitcoin/master bc0a895 Pieter Wuille: Do not set extra flags for unfiltered DNS seed results
< GitHub19>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #8207: [trivial] Add a link to the Bitcoin-Core repository and website to the About Dialog (master...Mf1606-LicInfo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8207