< MarcoFalke>
Basically https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7918 would conflict with segwit (on purpose) to get rid of the wildcard import and other cleanup. Should I submit this to the segwit branch instead?
< wumpus>
MarcoFalke: I've just enabled commit access to bitcoin/bitcoin for you - to get you started, can you try to merge #7912 using the github-merge.py script? If you need any help setting it up let me know
< GitHub128>
[bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #7868: net: Split DNS resolving functionality out of net structures (master...net-cleanup-resolve) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7868
< murch>
sipa: We've actually met once (very briefly) at Bitcoin 2014. :) I said hi, and told you that I'm a moderator on Bitcoin.SE. and you said, you love our work. Heh.
< murch>
Completely different topic: I'm going to have a meeting later today about a potential master thesis in the area of Bitcoin. I've proposed to do my master thesis on Coin Selection (which I've did some simulation work before, e.g. gmaxwell had commented then). I've seen that CoinSelection is scheduled to be "looked at" for 0.13. Do you think it would make sense to have a more systematic analysis of CoinSelection even though that's schedu
< murch>
My intent is to point out an easy improvement that could be made in the communication with the broader Bitcoin community. Unless I'm mistaken and the table is up-to-date. Then I'll rest my case of course. ;)
< murch>
btcdrak: E.g. adam3us has referred to the table 16 days ago (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4d3pdg/clearing_the_fud_around_segwit/d1nxxq6) as showing that secondary projects are working on SegWit. I've called him out on that, because the table doesn't actually show that. (I'm Xekyo on reddit). I would like to propose that development teams listed on that table get nudged to update their status, because it is my understanding
< GitHub192>
[bitcoin] yurizhykin opened pull request #7913: Fix for incorrect locking in GetPubKey() (keystore.cpp) (master...getpubkey-locking-fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7913
< GitHub79>
[bitcoin] sdaftuar opened pull request #7912: Tests: Fix deserialization of reject messages (master...fix-mininode-reject) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7912
< GitHub181>
[bitcoin] theuni opened pull request #7911: leveldb: integrate leveldb into our buildsystem (master...leveldb-integration) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7911
< sipa>
bitcoin.sipa.be is a node, and run with -segnet
< NicolasDorier>
morcos: there is this bug https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/issues/73, I'll find out what happen later, but the problem is that the transaction is rejected by mempool but still added to wallet transactions. Then after one block, the transaction is rebroadcasted but this time accepted to mempool. The caller of sendtoaddress got an error and thought the money
< GitHub76>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7762: [ZMQ] append a message sequence number to every ZMQ notification (master...2016/03/zmq_seq) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7762
< GitHub37>
bitcoin/master a1eb344 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7762: [ZMQ] append a message sequence number to every ZMQ notification...
< GitHub37>
bitcoin/master 0b25a9f Jonas Schnelli: [ZMQ] append a message sequence number to every ZMQ notification
< GitHub37>
bitcoin/master de821d5 Jonas Schnelli: [ZMQ] refactor message string
< GitHub199>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7625: Bugfix: Check for bench_bitcoin being enabled where needed, and skip UniValue dependency when unused (master...bugfix_bench_checks) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7625
< GitHub112>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7905: test: move accounting_tests and rpc_wallet_tests to wallet/test (master...2016_04_accounting_tests_to_wallet) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7905
< GitHub49>
bitcoin/master a25a4f5 Wladimir J. van der Laan: wallet_ismine.h → script/ismine.h...
< GitHub49>
bitcoin/master f4eae2d Wladimir J. van der Laan: test: Create test fixture for wallet...
< GitHub49>
bitcoin/master de39c95 Wladimir J. van der Laan: test: move accounting_tests and rpc_wallet_tests to wallet/test...
< GitHub89>
[bitcoin] pstratem opened pull request #7907: Optimize and Cleanup CScript::FindAndDelete (master...2016-04-17-findanddelete) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7907
< phantomcircuit>
cfields: what's the best way to add a new binary to the auto tools stuff? i tried copying bitcoin-tx stuff and renaming it but things exploded
2016-04-18
< GitHub142>
[bitcoin] theuni opened pull request #7906: net: prerequisites for p2p encapsulation changes (master...net-refactor-prerequisites) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7906
< GitHub19>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #7904: txdb: Fix assert crash in new UTXO set cursor (master...2016_04_fix_utxo_iterator) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7904
< GitHub31>
[bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #7903: Fix help text around importaddress and rename it to importscript (master...16-04-importaddress-helptext) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7903
< GitHub32>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7756: Add cursor to iterate over utxo set, use this in `gettxoutsetinfo` (master...2016_03_utxo_cursor) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7756
< GitHub77>
bitcoin/master 9e47fce Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7756: Add cursor to iterate over utxo set, use this in `gettxoutsetinfo`...
< GitHub77>
bitcoin/master 509cb00 Wladimir J. van der Laan: txdb: Add Cursor() method to CCoinsView to iterate over UTXO set...
< Luke-Jr>
Thanks for subscribing to the Bitcoin Core announcements list. Please confirm your subscription by clicking the link below: <-- the irony that the email goes out of its way to make the link un-clickable.. btcdrak
< GitHub93>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7842: RPC: do not print minping time in getpeerinfo when no ping received yet (master...20160408_getpeerinfo_no_ping_yet) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7842
< GitHub48>
bitcoin/master d97101e Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7842: RPC: do not print minping time in getpeerinfo when no ping received yet...
< GitHub48>
bitcoin/master 62a6486 Pavel Janík: RPC: do not print ping info in getpeerinfo when no ping received yet, fix help
< GitHub62>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7850: Removed call to `TryCreateDirectory` from `GetDefaultDataDir` in `src/util.cpp`. (master...issue7845) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7850
< sipa>
maybe it would be interesting for me as well... whenever my laptop battaery dies while compiling bitcoin core (not surprisingly, that's the most common activity during which power fails), my git tree is corrupted
< wumpus>
could work I guess, but seems overkill, every project just supports out-of-tree builds except bitcoin core :)
< GitHub19>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7863: getblockchaininfo: make bip9_softforks an object, not an array. (master...bip9-status-as-object) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7863
< GitHub61>
bitcoin/master 72c54e3 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7863: getblockchaininfo: make bip9_softforks an object, not an array....
< wumpus>
jonasschnelli: interesting - so a reindex is slow with LMDB, but a sync from another node is fast? Greg did a benchmark with a sync from another node and LMDB came out much faster: https://github.com/laanwj/bitcoin/tree/2016_04_mdb#x86_64 . Also wonder where the bottleneck is, but will add it to the performance results
< shangzhou>
sipa:http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ data is not up to date
< GitHub91>
[bitcoin] theuni opened pull request #7868: net: Split DNS resolving functionality out of net structures (master...net-cleanup-resolve) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7868
< GitHub177>
[bitcoin] mrCertified opened pull request #7867: deleted Configure.ac restore bits to all networks(%master%masterCode[{rLi}]) (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7867
2016-04-12
< sipa>
fun fact: you can create an ifthen .... else .... else .... else .... endif branch in bitcoin script
< gmaxwell>
A test for bitcoin core slavishly enforcing exact behavior? It couldn't be!
< GitHub99>
[bitcoin] rustyrussell opened pull request #7863: getblockchaininfo: make bip9_softforks an object, not an array. (master...bip9-status-as-object) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7863
2016-04-11
< GitHub88>
[bitcoin] sdaftuar opened pull request #7862: Use txid as key in mapAlreadyAskedFor (master...inv-to-txid-mapalreadyaskedfor) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7862
< BlueMatt>
hmm, the sendheaders stuff is pretty bitcoin-core-specific
< BlueMatt>
we DoS a node for sending us a header that doesnt connect to our chain, because bitcoin core keeps track of what it thinks its peers have for headers (and assumes they never throw away headers)
< GitHub84>
[bitcoin] promag opened pull request #7857: Add fee to fundrawtransaction (master...enhancement/add-fee-to-fundrawtransaction) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7857