< October 2024 >
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 123456789101112
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
2015-12-02
< Luke-Jr>
and at least my Bitcoin LJR wallet does (although I understand 0.12 won't)
< Luke-Jr>
gmaxwell: "Bitcoin only works for users with lots of bitcoins during spam attacks" is much better than "Bitcoin doesn't work during spam attacks period"
< GitHub39>
[bitcoin] pstratem opened pull request #7150: Print size of pcoinsTip cache in AcceptToMemoryPool (master...2015-12-1-printcachesize) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7150
< GitHub68>
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #7149: Bugfix: Correctly calculate priority when inputs are mined after dependent transactions enter the memory pool (master...bugfix_priority) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7149
< Luke-Jr>
anything else is harmful to Bitcoin
< sipa>
morcos: if everything in bitcoin was rational, nobody would have started using it
< GitHub151>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke reopened pull request #7084: mempool: Replace maxFeeRate of 10000*minRelayTxFee with maxTxFee (master...MarcoFalke-2015-mempoolMaxTxFee) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7084
< GitHub90>
bitcoin/master 7230187 Alex Morcos: Add TxPriority class and comparator
< GitHub54>
[bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #7146: Name union to prevent compiler warning (master...20151201_prevector_name_union) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7146
< GitHub181>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #7143: qt: use QMetaObject::invokeMethod for cross-thread signaling in clientmodel (master...2015_12_qt4_build) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7143
< rook520>
Why is it wrong to get involved in the bitcoin trade?? Wouldnt it be smart to buy some shares and just let it sit and not touch it...and just let it evolve with bitcoin itself??
< sipa>
jonasschnelli: opinion about asking on bitcoin-qt first startup how much RAM the user wants to make available for chainstate?
< jgarzik>
(picocoin thing just an anecdote noting Fedora people working on the overall ecosystem; Harald also works on bitcoin)
< jgarzik>
Vaguely related - Fedora keeps inching along towards shipping bitcoin - I got a patch from Harald Hoyer to picocoin, adding bitcoin's curve to an otherwise functional openssl lib. Once libsecp256k1 is packaged into Fedora, that makes a nice end run around the patent/copyright annoyances blocking Fedora deployment.
< GitHub22>
[bitcoin] sdaftuar opened pull request #7137: Tests: Explicitly set chain limits in replace-by-fee test (master...fix-rbf-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7137
< GitHub20>
[bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #7133: Replace setInventoryKnown with a rolling bloom filter (rebase of #7100) (master...known_bloom) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7133
< GitHub88>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7112: [Qt] reduce cs_main locks during tip update, more fluently update UI (master...2015/11/qt_tipupdate) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7112
< GitHub77>
bitcoin/master 947d20b Jonas Schnelli: [Qt] reduce cs_main in getVerificationProgress()
< GitHub77>
bitcoin/master e6d50fc Jonas Schnelli: [Qt] update block tip (height and date) without locking cs_main, update always (each block)
< GitHub77>
bitcoin/master 012fc91 Jonas Schnelli: NotifyBlockTip signal: switch from hash (uint256) to CBlockIndex*...
< wumpus>
bitcoin core's wallet makes the explicit assumption that we're the only one with the keys in this wallet.dat, they cannot be shared, so that should never happen
< btcdrak>
gmaxwell: I thoroughly agree with you. In fact, we sort of need a PR side to act as a communication bridge with the general public. The weekly IRC meetings have been really well received, but because they are posted on social media they get buried. This is why I discussed with harding to make a new section on bitcoin.org so we can collate these kind of
< wumpus>
gmaxwell: this is another example of how something only gains interest as soon as it is merged. RBF discussions have been going on for as long bitcoin exists, and still they manage to pose it as if this is something new and controversial instead of the compromise of years of argument
< GitHub118>
[bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #7127: Bugfix: Default -uiplatform is not actually the platform this build was compiled on (master...bugfix_uiplatform) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7127
< GitHub198>
bitcoin/master fa93174 Jonas Schnelli: Merge pull request #7127...
< GitHub198>
bitcoin/master a6cbc02 Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: Default -uiplatform is not actually the platform this build was compiled on
< GitHub107>
[bitcoin] gmaxwell closed pull request #7123: [WIP] Make trickle logic useful again, delay trickle when past upload limit. (master...actually_trickle) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7123
2015-11-28
< GitHub170>
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #7128: Constrain rpcport default values to a single location in code (master...const_rpcport) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7128
< GitHub26>
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #7127: Bugfix: Default -uiplatform is not actually the platform this build was compiled on (master...bugfix_uiplatform) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7127
< GitHub101>
[bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #6349: Constrain constant values to a single location in code (master...opt_defaults) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6349
< GitHub170>
[bitcoin] gmaxwell opened pull request #7123: [WIP] Make trickle logic useful again, delay trickle when past upload limit. (master...actually_trickle) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7123
< GitHub62>
[bitcoin] robegan21 opened pull request #7122: simple fix to mask command line arguments after they are copied (master...MaskCommandLineArgs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7122
2015-11-27
< GitHub102>
[bitcoin] petertodd opened pull request #7119: Add option to opt into full-RBF when sending funds (master...2015-11-opt-into-full-rbf-option) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7119
< jtimon>
anyway, I'll rewrite my policy stuff on bitcoin jt 0.12, just like my consensus stuff and then decide, worse case I can just rebase a giant branch once per major release
< GitHub146>
[bitcoin] paveljanik opened pull request #7118: Describe maxmempool and mempoolminfee in the getmempoolinfo RPC help. (master...20151127_getmempoolinfo_fixes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7118
< GitHub1>
[bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #7116: Trivial: Fix warning introduced by #7053 by casting to uint64_t (master...fix-7053) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7116
< GitHub29>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7114: util: Don't set strMiscWarning on every exception (master...2015_11_exception_nomiscwarning) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7114
< GitHub43>
bitcoin/master d6454f6 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7090...
< GitHub43>
bitcoin/master cde857f Peter Todd: Connect to Tor hidden services by default...
< wumpus>
in the end could just as well have used our own, hand-rolled binary packet format, every language needs a special library to interface to bitcoin anyway ...
< GitHub6>
[bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #7105: Keep track of explicit wallet conflicts instead of using mempool (master...realconflicts) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7105
< jtimon>
cfields_: I can't undesrtand why these commits break the build, it would be great if you could explain. why does the order matter in bitcoind_LDADD? why crypto/libbitcoin_crypto.a works but consensus/libbitcoin_consensus.a doesn't (inside of the consensus dir)? https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/compare/consensus-build...jtimon:consensus-build-full
< GitHub0>
[bitcoin] pstratem opened pull request #7104: [Mining] Build empty block on when chainTip changes. (master...2015-11-26-gbt-latency) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7104
< jonasschnelli>
we could try to get https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7096 reviewed and merged, and backported.... then remove the absolute fee from master (which is trivial)
< gmaxwell>
jonasschnelli: AFAIK nothing about the bitcoin system uses absolute fees, and it would be irrational for miners to do so.
< wump>
so re: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7096 was this change in RPC settxfee behavior ever planned, or noticed before? I think it's strange that this is in 0.11, but no one reported the change from per-kB to absolute fee?
< GitHub92>
[bitcoin] gmaxwell opened pull request #7100: Replace setInventoryKnown with a rolling bloom filter. (master...known_bloom) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7100
< tulip>
dnsseed.bitcoin.DASHjr.org
< sipa>
cfields_: i think it's running github.com/sipa/bitcoin-seeder
< wumpus>
it never was; gitian-downloader was meant to be a downloader for bitcoin that checks the gitian signatures, but AFAIK it was never completed or used
< wumpus>
jonasschnelli: good call on closing #7089 - indeed, bitcoin's core github is not the place to request changes to consensus behavior
< GitHub54>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7092: build: Set osx permissions in the dmg to make Gatekeeper happy (master...osx-perm-fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7092
< GitHub102>
bitcoin/master 348b281 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7092...
< GitHub102>
bitcoin/master 392d3c5 Cory Fields: build: Set osx permissions in the dmg to make Gatekeeper happy