< michaelfolkson>
hugohn: They aren't really bundled with the Core project. It is true the BIPs repo is under the Bitcoin Core GitHub org but no Bitcoin Core maintainers merge BIP PRs afaik so I think it is fine under the Core org
< hugohn>
As the Bitcoin protocol slowly ossifies, the bulk of new specs will likely be in the Application layer. It does make less sense to bundle them with the Core project.
< michaelfolkson>
I think there will be future discussions on a revised BIP process once (hopefully) Taproot activation is completed hugohn if you'd like to engage with that https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1015
< wumpus>
in any case, this discussion is kind of off-topic here, the bitcoin core project is one implementation, that the current BIPs repository is in the same orginazation is a historical artifact, it does not mean BIPs 'belong' to bitcoin core or something like that
< wumpus>
yes, moving to names might make sense too, in any case please don't let bitcoin innovation be stuck on having to centrally assign numbers, this shouldn't be an issue
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21849: fuzz: Limit toxic test globals to their respective scope (master...2105-fuzzToxic) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21849
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21848: refactor: Make CFeeRate constructor arch-independent (master...2105-feerate) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21848
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21840: test: Misc refactor to get rid of &foo[0] raw pointers (master...2105-testRefactor) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21840
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9424 | Change LogAcceptCategory to use uint32_t rather than sets of strings. by gmaxwell · Pull Request #9424 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #21841: Send fewer feefilter messages (avoid the wobbling number issue) (master...SteadierFeefilter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21841
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] hebasto opened pull request #313: qt, build: Optimize string concatenation by default (master...210503-builder) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/313
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21840: test: Misc refactor to get rid of &foo[0] raw byte pointers (master...2105-testRefactor) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21840
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #20867: Support up to 20 keys for multisig under Segwit context (master...descriptor_multi_wsh) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20867
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master ae0429d Antoine Poinsot: script: allow up to 20 keys in wsh() descriptors
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 063df9e Antoine Poinsot: test/functional: standardness sanity checks for P2(W)SH multisig
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 9fc68fa Antoine Poinsot: script: match multisigs with up to MAX_PUBKEYS_PER_MULTISIG keys
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #21463: doc: Address feedback from Transifex translator community (master...210317-transifex) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21463
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #21836: scripted-diff: Replace three dots with ellipsis in the UI strings (master...210502-ellipsis) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21836
< gmaxwell>
https://bitcoin-takeover.com/why-the-taproot-activation-proves-bitcoins-decentralization/ "However, the beginning appears to be pretty rocky: at block height 681487, only one block (mined by Slush Pool) out of 80 has signalled the activation. If 201 blocks don’t include the Taproot activation data, then the miner activation gets suspended and the community is going to look for another way to
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Rspigler opened pull request #21828: doc: Add historical release notes for 0.21.1 (master...0.21.1-release_notes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21828
2021-05-01
< gmaxwell>
rebroad: bitcoin-dev channel was essentially abandoned long ago. I don't think it's for anything, I had heard it was going to get closed down.
< rebroad>
what is #bitcoin-dev channel for now?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #21827: Display progress of LoadBlockDB() on splash screen (master...SplashLoadBlockProgress) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21827
< jarthur>
* #bitcoin-mining
< jarthur>
I sent out a notice to #bitcoin-miners. Is there a guide to constructing a signaling block for operators who don't use Core's getblocktemplate or use an older version than today's?
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] rebroad closed pull request #308: Display progress of LoadBlockDB() on splash screen (master...SplashLoadBlockProgress) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/308
< robert_spigler>
hopefully making a full release announcement - bitcoin-core-dev, website, etc, will help. Maybe they just aren't fake signalling/running the RC1
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] hebasto opened pull request #309: gui: Add access to the Peers tab from the network icon (master...210501-network) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/309
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] hebasto opened pull request #307: Make row color alternating in the Peers Tab switchable (master...210501-stripes) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/307
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] hebasto closed pull request #38: Add ability to integrate the client with desktop environment on Linux (master...200720-desktop) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/38
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] rebroad opened pull request #305: Display send/recv in Bps instead of totals in the debug window (master...SendRecvSpeed-gui) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/305
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] rebroad closed pull request #21806: Display send/recv in Bps instead of totals in the debug window (master...SendRecvSpeed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21806
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #21806: Display send/recv in Bps instead of totals in the debug window (master...SendRecvSpeed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21806
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #21805: Send fewer feefilter messages (and avoid the wobbling issue) (master...SteadierFeefilter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21805
< michaelfolkson>
I guess this is a question for fanquake. What's the latest thinking/progress on supporting Bitcoin Core builds on ARM MacOS? He didn't sound enthusiastic or confident about the prospect in July last year
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #21688: doc: note on SDK for macOS depends cross-compile (master...depends-note-sdk) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21688
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 16d0051 fanquake: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21688: doc: note on SDK for macOS depends cross-comp...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 5e7d199 Jarol Rodriguez: doc: note on SDK for macOS depends cross-compile
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] hebasto closed pull request #264: Add "Copy address" item to the context menu in the Peers table (master...210330-copy) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/264
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] glozow opened pull request #21800: [WIP] mempool/validation: mempool ancestor/descendant limits for packages (master...package-mempool-ancestors) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21800
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #21795: fuzz: Terminate immediately if a fuzzing input ever causes a DNS lookup (belts and suspenders) (master...fuzz-terminate-on-dns-lookup) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21795
< promag>
libtool: warning: remember to run 'libtool --finish /Users/joao/Projects/bitcoin/depends/arm-apple-darwin20.3.0/lib'
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21793: build: use `-isysroot` over `--sysroot` on macOS (master...macos_use_isysroot) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21793