<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] theStack opened pull request #27653: test: add unit test coverage for Python ECDSA implementation (master...202305-test-add_ecdsa_signing_unittest) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27653
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27602 | net processing: avoid serving non-announced txs as a result of a MEMPOOL message by sr-gi · Pull Request #27602 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] glozow opened pull request #27609: rpc: allow submitpackage to be called outside of regtest (master...open-submitpackage) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27609
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sdaftuar opened pull request #27608: p2p: Avoid prematurely clearing download state for other peers (master...2023-05-download-bug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27608
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] furszy opened pull request #27607: init: verify blocks data existence only once for all the indexers (master...2023_index_decouple_has_data_checks) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27607
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #27491: refactor: Move chain constants to the util library (master...kernelChainType) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27491
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #27605: refactor: Replace global find_value function with UniValue::find_value method (master...2305-univalue-no-dangling-) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27605
<BlueMatt[m]>
huh, looks like if a transaction gets removed from the mempool bitcoin core just thinks your money disappeared? getbalance shows a reduction and listunspent shows neither the removed-from-mempool transaction nor the previous one.
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] kevkevinpal opened pull request #27603: test: added coverage to mining_basic.py (master...test/mining/emptyBlockVtx) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27603
2023-05-08
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sr-gi opened pull request #27602: net: avoid serving non-announced txs as a result of a MEMPOOL message (master...mempool-not-inved) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27602
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] furszy opened pull request #27601: wallet: don't duplicate change output if already exist (master...2023_wallet_double_change_output) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27601
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] pinheadmz opened pull request #27600: Make peer eviction slightly more aggresive to make room for whitelisted inbound connections (master...whitebind-evict) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27600
<fjahr>
ghost43: could it be that the server host or their providers are blocking bitcoin traffic? Or do you have other nodes on servers in the same infra that don't have the issue?
<jamesob>
hey, there's no way we can do Github access just to maintain a particular project is there? The assumeutxo board is out of date: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #27580: msvc: Cleanup after upgrading libsecp256k1 up to 0.3.0 (master...230505-cleanup) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27580
<harding_>
furszy: for #27195, was it previously possible to use bumpfee with a single output that was your own address from the specified wallet if it wasn't a change address? In particular, I'm curious whether your patch makes "cancelling" a transaction using Bitcoin Core's wallet practical for the first time, or whether it was practical before and this patch just fixes a broken edge case (cancelling to a change address).
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] st3b1t opened pull request #27588: rpc: append rpcauth.py hash in config and show pass (master...rpcauth-show-pass-writeless) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27588
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #27405: util: Use steady clock instead of system clock to measure durations (master...2304-steady-over-millis-) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27405
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa97621 MarcoFalke: qt: Use steady clock to throttle GUI notifications
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #27554: test: Treat `bitcoin-wallet` binary in the same way as others (master...230502-toolwallet) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27554
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26076 | Switch hardened derivation marker to h (in normalized descriptors and new wallets) by Sjors · Pull Request #26076 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #27580: msvc: Cleanup after upgrading libsecp256k1 up to 0.3.0 (master...230505-cleanup) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27580
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] benthecarman opened pull request #27578: Allow accepting non-standard transactions on mainnet (master...non-std-tx-mainnet) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27578
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] mzumsande opened pull request #27577: p2p: give seednodes time before falling back to fixed seeds (master...202304_seednode_fixedseed_interaction) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27577
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] TheCharlatan opened pull request #27576: kernel: Remove args, chainparams, chainparamsbase from kernel library (master...rmKernelArgs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27576
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #27570: refactor: Remove need to pass chainparams from BlockManager methods (master...2305-blockman-chain-params-) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27570
2023-05-03
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 merged pull request #24957: prune, import: allow pruning to work during loadblock import (master...issue_23852_import_prune) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24957
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 4581a68 0xb10c: clarify processing of mempool-msgs when NODE_BLOOM
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 8f5da89 glozow: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27559: doc: clarify processing of mempool-msgs when ...
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #27561: test: Explicitly specify directory where to search tests for (master...230503-path) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27561
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #26953: contrib: add ELF OS ABI check to symbol-check.py (master...symbol_check_elf_abi) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26953
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 65ba8a7 fanquake: contrib: add ELF ABI check to symbol-check.py
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 49d543d fanquake: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26953: contrib: add ELF OS ABI check to symbol-check...
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #25935: build: include example bitcoin.conf in build outputs under share/examples/ subdirectory (master...dist_bitcoinconf_as_example) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25935
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] furszy closed pull request #26644: wallet: bugfix, 'wallet_load_ckey' unit test fails with bdb (master...2022_walletdb_fix_bdb_deadlock) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26644
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] 0xB10C opened pull request #27559: doc: clarify processing of mempool-msgs when NODE_BLOOM (master...2023-05-clarify-mempool-bloom) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27559
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] pinheadmz closed pull request #27505: net: use interruptible async getaddrinfo wrapper from libevent for DNS (master...dns-libevent) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27505
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] pinheadmz opened pull request #27557: net: call getaddrinfo() in detachable thread to prevent stalling (master...async-getaddrinfo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27557
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] furszy opened pull request #27556: wallet: fix deadlock in bdb read write operation (master...2023_wallet_db_deadlock) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27556
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #27554: test: Treat `bitcoin-wallet` binary in the same way as others (master...230502-toolwallet) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27554
<josie>
furszy: sounds cool! so this would be bitcoin core node which asks for blocks on demand based on the wallet / rpc commands?
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #27552: Add support for "partial" fuzzers that indicate usefulness (master...202305_partial_fuzzers) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27552
<emzy>
FWIW I run 4 bitcoin core public nodes for Bisq, with peerbloomfilters=1. They are very busy but work fine.
<Murch>
<BlueMatt[m]> "is there a case where bitcoin..." <- Yes, generally the fee estimation can be unreliable if you were offline. We use only transactions that were in the mempool and then got included in a block, so I think if you e.g. went offline a bit before the mempool got cleared out, then started it later it would reload from the mempool file on startup, see that all these transactions have gotten confirmed, including ones that the node has just
<BlueMatt[m]>
is there a case where bitcoin core may return nonsense fees for estimatesmartfee if its been offline for a few hours? trying to figure out why some lightning nodes sometimes just use trash fees (1sat/vB) which is very insecure and can lead to unintended force-closes.
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] glozow closed pull request #27476: mempool: keep CPFP'd transactions when loading from mempool.dat (master...2023-04-persist-packages) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27476
<jon_atack>
An attack on the I2P network is ongoing since a day or so. Bitcoin nodes running using the i2pd router may not be able to create SAM sessions due to floodfills.
<michaelfolkson>
From https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25871#issuecomment-1382334059 "Maintainers inherently need to look at the things that everyone else has already looked at, if only to give it a final once over before merging (but hopefully, an actual review, not just looking it over)."
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] brunoerg opened pull request #27549: fuzz: addrman, add coverage for `network` field in `Select()` (master...2023-04-fuzz-addrman-select) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27549