<prayank>
ariard: re: new avatar - yes I thought about it considering the things. I would do it after deleting all my accounts because I still want to contribute to Bitcoin. I gave up after I wake up, saw after everything on websites, asked one reliable dev who sadi pls dont give up as we all tried to at some point. Me giving up would affect bitcoin and thats not what I want.
<prayank>
jonatack: I respect you but where does "censorship" comes here or is it only for social media or when it affects you. Bitcoin dev mailing list is not same as anything as anything in this world for me. It was used to settle things when they could not be done on github, reddit, twitter etc. if that is vulnerable to one person deciding what is good enoug for others to see its same as facebook, twitter etc. I have tried my best to
<prayank>
contribute to bitcoin and sometimes being in places where you never would want to be.
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #24485: [23.x] guix: use same commit for codesigning time-machine (23.x...backport_24484) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24485
<michaelfolkson>
Reminder that this channel is for Bitcoin Core development discussion. There is a #bitcoin-dev channel for discussion of mailing list, BIPs etc. prayank has been told that on multiple occasions now
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 merged pull request #24484: guix: use same commit for codesigning time-machine (master...sync_guix_time_machine) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24484
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 29862bd fanquake: guix: use same commit for codesigning time-machine
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #24484: guix: use same commit for codesigning time-machine (master...sync_guix_time_machine) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24484
2022-03-05
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #24479: Bugfix: util: Correctly handle Number value types in GetArg/GetBoolArg (master...bugfix_settings_numberval) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24479
<prayank>
I have bitcoin dev mailing list address in Cc for 2 emails. Don't see anything weird. Doing same thing for other emails.
<prayank>
Not here to build relationships. Expected minimum things form a mailing list used for bitcoin. If people can't do things I would ask questions and assume things as you do for others while censoring, communicating etc.
<prayank>
achow101: I have tried everything I could in last 2 days including reaching out Ruben Somsen and Bryan Bishop. There was nothing wrong in the email and it's been shared on Twitter: https://twitter.com/prayankgahlot/status/1499940485510864900 , Stackexchange:https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/112719/does-wasabi-wallet-2-0-have-coin-control and reddit. I don't care what people think about my behaviour, I am not he
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master bbbbeaf MarcoFalke: fuzz: Limit script_format to 100kB
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #22763: fuzz: execute each file in dir without fuzz engine (master...issue-21461-execute-file-without-fuzz-engine) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22763
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] ajtowns opened pull request #24472: fuzz: execute each file in dir without fuzz engine (master...202203-phuzztesting) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24472
2022-03-03
<dongcarl>
sidebar: anyone using emacs/spacemacs/doom emacs to work on bitcoin and have a nice config?
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master e0cb7b3 laanwj: build: Bump version to 23.99
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #24468: init, doc: improve -onlynet help and related tor/i2p documentation (master...onlynet-help-and-doc-improvements) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24468
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #20196: net: fix GetListenPort() to derive the proper port (master...fix_GetListenPort) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20196
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 60da1ea Vasil Dimov: timedata: make it possible to reset the state
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 43868ba Vasil Dimov: timedata: rename variables to match the coding style
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 3cb9d9c Vasil Dimov: net: make CaptureMessage() mockable
<prayank>
With current level of privacy in Bitcoin that we are trying to keep as is without CT because SUPPLY (no clue why range proof not possible) and things used by people in real life when you expect basics like no address reuse, nobody sharing tx/address info on social media etc. and BIP 47 is bad because creating payment code with this library can kill bitcoin: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bip47
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Empact opened pull request #24462: For descriptor pubkey parse errors, include context information (master...2022-03-descriptor-pubkey-context) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24462
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #24460: build: update ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx to serial 14 (master...2203-ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx-😈) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24460
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #24375: Do not use `LocalTestingSetup` in getarg_tests test file. (master...pr/fixt) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24375
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 5d7f225 Kiminuo: Do not use `LocalTestingSetup` in getarg_tests test file.
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 0652ee7 Rob Fielding: Add size check on meta.key_origin.path
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 961b9e4 Andrew Chow: wallet: Parse hdKeypath if key_origin is not available
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #23542: net: open p2p connections to nodes that listen on non-default ports (master...connect_to_any_port) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23542
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 2e38a0e Vasil Dimov: net: add CServiceHash constructor so the caller can provide the salts
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] dongcarl closed pull request #17602: net: Limit # of IPs learned from a DNS seed by family (master...2019-11-lower-nMaxIPs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17602
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Empact opened pull request #24455: refactor: Split ArgsManager out of util/system (master...2022-03-util-args-manager) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24455
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fc47181 eugene: fuzz: FuzzedFileProvider::write should not return negative value
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 292a841 MarcoFalke: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24449: fuzz: FuzzedFileProvider::write should not re...
2022-02-27
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] Crypt-iQ opened pull request #24449: fuzz: FuzzedFileProvider::write should not return negative value (master...fopencookie_write) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24449
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #24441: fuzz: Limit script_format to 100kB (master...2202-fuzzScriptFormat100k-🤙) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24441
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #24028: doc: Explain in the generate* RPC docs that they are only for testing (master...202201_rpcmining_lol_no) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24028
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa0819e MarcoFalke: doc: Move peer-review paragraph to right section
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa2b65b MarcoFalke: doc: Add link to release-process.md in CONTRIBUTING.md
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa694f6 MarcoFalke: doc: Explain that feedback needs to be addressed
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #24440: doc: update maintainer list in REVIEWERS (master...update_reviewers_maintainers) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24440
<prayank>
I have seen putin with vitalik in 2017 and bitcoin is obviously better so expecting your infosec team runs the software created in this repository. Please stop this nonsense. No communities or countries ever achieved anything good with such things in past. Humans like you get affected at ground level maybe some people that you consider collateral damage but they are same as you. Nobody would say anything to some extent for some
<jeremyrubin>
it'd also be good if 1 bitcoin.conf could configure >1 signet so i think the [signet.xyz] format is probably right
<jeremyrubin>
It would also be nice if bitcoin core could have multiple signets in the chain configs
<laanwj>
luke-jr: there was some discussion about it at the time and we moved it into bitcoin-core at some point https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-acks , but no one picked it up
<jeremyrubin>
or if bitcoin.conf could have multiple [signet.xyz]'s for configging different named signets
<MarcoFalke>
luke-jr: No one signs review comments, so a GitHub employee can hijack Bitcoin Core if maintainers blindly click the merge button without thinking
<laanwj>
one proposed meeting topic this week (you can propose meeting topics during the week with #proposedmeetingtopic): Bitcoin Core contributor survey (ajonas)