[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #21041: log: Move "Pre-allocating up to position 0x[…] in […].dat" log message to debug category (master...pre-allocation-up-to-position-0xff-in-foo.dat) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21041
bitcoin/master 937dfa8 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #21041: log: Move "Pre-allocating up to position 0x[…] in […].dat" l...
bitcoin/master 25f899c practicalswift: log: Move "Pre-allocating up to position 0x[...] in [...].dat" log message...
MarcoFalke: You can most likely garbage collect and get some space back. One thing on my list is to pin the latest manifest output so that it doesn't get garbage collected, so that you can safely garbage collect everything else without affecting bitcoin builds
FWIW: All guix package builds are offline (enforced by network namespaces I think) and hermetic. The bitcoin build script I wrote also builds in a completely offline environment by default.
achow: For doing a build of Bitcoin Core, something like: env ADDITIONAL_GUIX_COMMON_FLAGS='--no-substitutes --keep-failed' ADDITIONAL_GUIX_ENVIRONMENT_FLAGS='--bootstrap' `./contrib/guix/guix-build.sh (which will build for all hosts)
wumpus: I think we were discussing about positives of Bitcoin Stackexchange few days back. Sad to see one of the moderators mentioning specific altcoins in answers when it could have been avoided. One of the altcoin mentioned in this answer has few people associated with it who spread misinformation about Bitcoin. And we have people with good reputation making these altcoins sound legit by mentioning in the answers.
To enter Bitcoin Core your PR must have this much <----------------->
I'll probably spend tomorrow looking at Erlay before the PR review club (on UK time so review club is evening for me). Will be on the bitcoin-core-pr-reviews channel trying to avoid the questions set for the review club session
I have a nano ledger s with some bitcoin. I have the 24 words and wallet in a safe place. I went to https://iancoleman.io/bip39/ using a Ubuntu live from USB. I put the 24 mnemonic words and could not find any bitcoin address ever used. I freaked. I thought. Oh my god! I ordered a second brand new nano ledger s. Put the 24 words, using ledger live in a brand new laptop and my coins were there in the brand new ledger nano s. I am safe. But I have
can someone with bitcoin-core rights enable cirrus CI for btcdeb repo? i can't find the option so I assume I'm not allowed
[bitcoin] amitiuttarwar opened pull request #21121: [test] Small unit test improvements, including helper to make mempool transaction (master...2021-01-unit-test-valid-tx) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21121
shesek: these kind of proposals are as old as bitcoin itself but i don't think anyone ever solved the 'who to trust' issue, how can you have infrastructure that gives you a reasonable confidence in that a certain validation is correct, like you can probably just copy a friend's node and trust them but yo udefinitely don't want to YOLO it off the internet
copumpkin: Sure, happy to chat, we can also go to #bitcoin-builds, where bitcoin build systems people hang out :-)
Hi copumpkin, the main (by a large margin) reason is because of Guix's commitment towards bootstrappability at the time I was investigating it as a possible build system for Bitcoin. At that time I had used Nix for a couple of years, and would have preferred to use Nix due to familiarity, but unfortunately there was less of an effort to make it
is there a writeup somewhere on guix vs. nix from a bitcoin dev perspective?
bitcoin/master 506e658 Jon Atack: gui: display plain "Inbound" in peer details
bitcoin/master 6c61408 Jonas Schnelli: Merge bitcoin-core/gui#203: Display plain "Inbound" in peer details