< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16439 | cli/gui: support "@height" in place of blockhash for getblock on client side by ajtowns · Pull Request #16439 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< sipa>
if you guix, presumably you got it in a way you're comfortable with, and if you have that - regardless of how you did so - you can build a reproducible bitcoin core release binary
< warren>
Should a goal of bitcoin's release reproduce the bootstrap of guix and challenge? Or you expect guix to be already somehow bootstrapped on your own?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #21041: log: Move "Pre-allocating up to position 0x[…] in […].dat" log message to debug category (master...pre-allocation-up-to-position-0xff-in-foo.dat) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21041
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 937dfa8 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #21041: log: Move "Pre-allocating up to position 0x[…] in […].dat" l...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 25f899c practicalswift: log: Move "Pre-allocating up to position 0x[...] in [...].dat" log message...
< dongcarl>
MarcoFalke: You can most likely garbage collect and get some space back. One thing on my list is to pin the latest manifest output so that it doesn't get garbage collected, so that you can safely garbage collect everything else without affecting bitcoin builds
< dongcarl>
FWIW: All guix package builds are offline (enforced by network namespaces I think) and hermetic. The bitcoin build script I wrote also builds in a completely offline environment by default.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #20211: Use -Wswitch for TxoutType where possible (master...2010-WswitchTxoutType) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20211
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master e498aef MarcoFalke: Merge #20211: Use -Wswitch for TxoutType where possible
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa650ca MarcoFalke: Use -Wswitch for TxoutType where possible
< prusnak>
dongcarl: is there a Guix Docker image or what's the preferred way to build bitcoin w/ guix on macos ?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #20915: fuzz: Fail if message type is not fuzzed (master...2101-fuzzFailMsgType) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20915
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master a59e7ed MarcoFalke: Merge #20915: fuzz: Fail if message type is not fuzzed
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa4bc89 MarcoFalke: fuzz: Fail if message type is not fuzzed
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master faefed8 MarcoFalke: fuzz: Count message type fuzzers before main()
< fanquake>
achow: For doing a build of Bitcoin Core, something like: env ADDITIONAL_GUIX_COMMON_FLAGS='--no-substitutes --keep-failed' ADDITIONAL_GUIX_ENVIRONMENT_FLAGS='--bootstrap' `./contrib/guix/guix-build.sh (which will build for all hosts)
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] maayank opened pull request #21141: Add new format string placeholders for walletnotify (master...walletnotify-blockhash) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21141
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21135: scripts: check for control flow instrumentation in security-check.py (master...security_check_cf_protection) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21135
< jonatack>
bitcoin conf : i2psam=127.0.0.1:7656 and i2pacceptincoming=1
< jonatack>
wumpus: idk, i2pd is the only one i've managed to have running with bitcoin
< jonatack>
wumpus: vasild: I've been using i2pd these past weeks, been working well for me. apt install i2pd / systemctl enable i2pd.service / systemctl start i2pd.service, update bitcoin.conf, done
< prayank>
luke-jr: sad but I will keep trying my best with my contribution and wumpus: Bitcoin Stackexchange is used as reference for lot of things/discussion including Bitcoin Core issues and PRs.
< michaelfolkson>
Right #bitcoin
< luke-jr>
prayank: Bitcoin's Stackexchange has a history of misinformation
< prayank>
wumpus: I think we were discussing about positives of Bitcoin Stackexchange few days back. Sad to see one of the moderators mentioning specific altcoins in answers when it could have been avoided. One of the altcoin mentioned in this answer has few people associated with it who spread misinformation about Bitcoin. And we have people with good reputation making these altcoins sound legit by mentioning in the answers.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] vasild opened pull request #21129: fuzz: check that ser+unser produces the same AddrMan (master...fuzz_addrman_serunser) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21129
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21121 | [test] Small unit test improvements, including helper to make mempool transaction by amitiuttarwar · Pull Request #21121 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jnewbery>
sipa: ok, so you think it still needs review before merging into Bitcoin Core? Would it therefore make sense to split it into a separate PR?
< jnewbery>
To enter Bitcoin Core your PR must have this much <----------------->
< michaelfolkson>
I'll probably spend tomorrow looking at Erlay before the PR review club (on UK time so review club is evening for me). Will be on the bitcoin-core-pr-reviews channel trying to avoid the questions set for the review club session
< bioverse>
Anyway, do you think bitcoin can be used in the future for time-lock encryption?
< sipa>
this channel is for development; you may get better help on https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com (but search for relevant questions first)
< bioverse>
I have a nano ledger s with some bitcoin. I have the 24 words and wallet in a safe place. I went to https://iancoleman.io/bip39/ using a Ubuntu live from USB. I put the 24 mnemonic words and could not find any bitcoin address ever used. I freaked. I thought. Oh my god! I ordered a second brand new nano ledger s. Put the 24 words, using ledger live in a brand new laptop and my coins were there in the brand new ledger nano s. I am safe. But I have
< kallewoof>
can someone with bitcoin-core rights enable cirrus CI for btcdeb repo? i can't find the option so I assume I'm not allowed
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] amitiuttarwar opened pull request #21121: [test] Small unit test improvements, including helper to make mempool transaction (master...2021-01-unit-test-valid-tx) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21121
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21112: ci: use Focal for macOS and Win cross builds (master...actually_use_focal_in_cirrus_ci) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21112
< wumpus>
shesek: these kind of proposals are as old as bitcoin itself but i don't think anyone ever solved the 'who to trust' issue, how can you have infrastructure that gives you a reasonable confidence in that a certain validation is correct, like you can probably just copy a friend's node and trust them but yo udefinitely don't want to YOLO it off the internet
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21107: test: remove type: comments in favour of actual annotations (master...just_use_typing_directly) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21107
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #21081: test: fix the unreachable code at feature_taproot (master...taproot-test-return) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21081
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master cf26ca3 fanquake: Merge #21081: test: fix the unreachable code at feature_taproot
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 5e0cd25 Bruno Garcia: fix the unreachable code at feature_taproot
< Bobby123>
does anyone by chance know of a bitcoin nonce dataset?
2021-02-05
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] dhruv opened pull request #21090: Default to NODE_WITNESS in nLocalServices (master...default-to-node-witness-2021) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21090
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] dongcarl opened pull request #21089: guix: Add support for powerpc64{,le} (master...2021-02-guix-ppc64-support) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21089
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] dongcarl opened pull request #21088: guix: Jump forwards in time-machine and adapt (master...2021-02-bump-time-machine) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21088
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] dongcarl opened pull request #21087: guix: Passthrough BASE_CACHE into container (master...2020-12-guix-base-cache) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21087
< dongcarl>
copumpkin: Sure, happy to chat, we can also go to #bitcoin-builds, where bitcoin build systems people hang out :-)
< dongcarl>
Hi copumpkin, the main (by a large margin) reason is because of Guix's commitment towards bootstrappability at the time I was investigating it as a possible build system for Bitcoin. At that time I had used Nix for a couple of years, and would have preferred to use Nix due to familiarity, but unfortunately there was less of an effort to make it
< copumpkin>
is there a writeup somewhere on guix vs. nix from a bitcoin dev perspective?
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 506e658 Jon Atack: gui: display plain "Inbound" in peer details
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 6c61408 Jonas Schnelli: Merge bitcoin-core/gui#203: Display plain "Inbound" in peer details