07:17 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] tboy1337 opened pull request #34314: wallet: Fix MaxSatisfactionWeight calculation for Taproot descriptors (master...fix-tr-descriptor-weight) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34314

07:40 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] maximtea64 opened pull request #34315: Update README.CLIWONtea (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34315

07:40 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] DrahtBot closed pull request #34315: . (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34315

12:00 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] maflcko opened pull request #34317: fuzz: Exclude too expensive inputs in descriptor_parse targets (master...2601-fuzz-desc-parse) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34317

12:47 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin-maintainer-tools] sedited opened pull request #192: Update make-tag for cmake (main...patch_make-tag) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-maintainer-tools/pull/192

12:48 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin-maintainer-tools] sedited closed pull request #192: Update make-tag for cmake (main...patch_make-tag) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-maintainer-tools/pull/192

13:49 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] maflcko opened pull request #34318: contrib: Revert "verify-commits sha1 exceptions" (master...2601-contrib-verify-commits) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34318

13:50 <BlueMatt[m]> has anyone played around with radicale? we're (LDK) getting really tired of github being broken (unicorn/503s all the time) let alone flaky and their apparent increased desire to charge money. it seems something decentralized where things like comments are authenticated would be a big win in terms of removing third-party trust too, but curious if anyone has played with it/thinks its production-ready.

13:59 <sipa> radicle, you mean?

14:00 <sipa> i've heard the name, but never played with it

14:07 <dodo> c

14:16 <BlueMatt[m]> sorry yes lol

14:16 <BlueMatt[m]> radicale is great, but unrelated...

14:19 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #34319: Drop some `IWYU pragma: export` and document IWYU usage (master...260116-iwyu-export) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34319

14:20 <BlueMatt[m]> only real question i have is if they have any kind of ability to moderate comments, if they do (eg if we can just set up some automated "please go to this website and pass a captcha/deposit 10 sats to comment" thing) then istm very worth trying for a few months

14:20 <BlueMatt[m]> otherwise you're gonna get flooded by bots and garbage

14:20 <flooded> you rang?

14:23 <BlueMatt[m]> also i guess whether you can comment/open issues via the web ui or if you have to use the tui

14:30 <BlueMatt[m]> ah you cant allow randos to comment via the web interface, but you can run an instance locally and then comment via the web. bleh so close. nevermind

14:37 <darosior> cc laanwj

14:37 <darosior> i know she's been keeping track of radicle for a while

14:38 <BlueMatt[m]> yea, it seems like they've got most of the big pieces in place but are short a few major items (at least the above two) before its really something to switch to.

14:43 <BlueMatt[m]> looks like they have a draft spec for separating users and nodes but first have to do that then you could imagine a webui that is more traditional github-like for those who dont want to do cli tools

14:43 <BlueMatt[m]> so probably using it is blocked on that

14:43 <BlueMatt[m]> specifically https://radicle.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/369876-RIPs/topic/Agent.20Repository/with/561870858

14:58 <laanwj> <darosior> "i know she's been keeping..." <- there was a time i was actively watching radicle. at the time it was far from usable for any kind of real project with many contributors. it's been a while though

14:59 <laanwj> also they started using some kind of block chain token, which made me mostly lose interest

15:01 <laanwj> they do have a desktop version

15:01 <darosior> oh yikes

15:04 <laanwj> according to the faq (searching for "token") https://radicle.xyz/faq they say they only use it for financing development. there were times they wanted to integrate it into the software itself, i'm glad they reconsidered