<corebot>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/34269 | wallet: disallow creating new or restoring to an unnamed (default) wallet by achow101 · Pull Request #34269 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<fanquake>
Seems like this also missed the release notes
<sliv3r__>
yeah is #34269 it missed the release note :/
<corebot>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/34269 | wallet: disallow creating new or restoring to an unnamed (default) wallet by achow101 · Pull Request #34269 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<sliv3r__>
just curious can it be added afterwards or they are auto generated from the files in the dir?
enochazariah_ has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
brunoerg has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
brunoerg has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jonatack has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
jonatack has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<darosior>
Yes what broke BTCPay compatibility is #34269, cf X thread above
<corebot>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/34269 | wallet: disallow creating new or restoring to an unnamed (default) wallet by achow101 · Pull Request #34269 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
brunoerg has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
Holz has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
Holz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
l0rinc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jonatack has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
jonatack has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #35131: guix, refactor: Minor script cleanups and improvements (master...260421-guix-shell) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35131
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master ab58897 David Gumberg: refactor: torcontrol add connection checks to restart_with_mock
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 8b68287 David Gumberg: test: Make torcontrol max line length test stricter and test boundaries.
<bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 9fe5896 David Gumberg: tor: torcontrol disconnect on too many lines to avoid OOM
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sedited merged pull request #35087: tor: limit torcontrol line size that is processed to prevent OOM (master...2026-04-14-torcontrol-linelimit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35087
jonatack has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
timbo_xyz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
timbo_xyz has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
hacker4web3bitco has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
brunoerg has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoincore.org] darosior opened pull request #1240: 31.0 release: include missing EOL warning and security advisory pre-announcement (master...2604_31_pre_announcement) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/1240
apollodorus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
havochunter has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
* darosior
having the hubris of thinking he can write 3 sentences of English without screwing it up
<darosior>
Sorry for making you correct my typo in the era of LLMs Murch[m] and sipa
<sipa>
to be fair, it's not really a language optimized for human communication
brunoerg has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<sipa>
i'm sure it's a useful absurdity LLMs came up with to reason in, but for human-to-human communication there ought to be things with less rules and more consistency at the same time
<darosior>
sipa's about to reinvent Esperanto
<sipa>
(somewhat seriously... doesn't anyone think it's bewildering that LLMs think in English?!)
bugs_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
timbo_xyz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
hacker4web3bitco has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] darosior opened pull request #35132: doc: update release process to mention security advisories pre-announcements (master...2604_release_preannouncements) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/35132
timbo_xyz has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
hacker4web3bitco has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
<_aj_>
sipa: MiniMax M2.5 will think in french if prompted in french with opencode, fwiw
<_aj_>
sipa: (up until a point, at any rate... after injecting too many english comments from the codebase, seems like it switches back)
l0rinc has quit [Quit: l0rinc]
timbo_xyz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
enochazariah has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
<sipa>
_aj_: yes, but why human languages at all? obviously, that's because they're trained on it, but i still find it strange that that actually works at all, as opposed to some more logic-distilled or purely machine language instead (at least dropping the overhead of complying with english grammar on ever roundtrip)
<_aj_>
sipa: i mean, they're language models, if they're thinking at all, thinking in language makes sense. i think there's an argument that "latent states" might be more important though, and the language-based changes of thought are more window-dressing? dunno