< harding>
PRab: oh, I was looking for what to put on the release notes section of the Bitcoin.org website when 0.11.2 gets released. (We usually put up a draft PR when the RCs start getting built.)
< harding>
If there are no notes yet, maybe I'll try drafting them now (sounds kinda fun) and wumpus can give them a review when he gets a chance.
< jgarzik>
tagged univalue 1.0.1
< michagogo>
harding: I'd imagine it couldn't hurt
< michagogo>
Worst case, they don't get used :-)
< michagogo>
And yeah, I think there aren't release notes (at least not published ones) yet: 1:51:56 <wumpus> I don't think there's anything to be done there either (well apart from version bump and release notes)
< michagogo>
1:52:20 <wumpus> (and release notes don't necessarily have to wait before the tag)
< harding>
michagogo: that's what I figured too, worst case they don't get used. :-) I think I'm almost done; I'm just trying to figure out good wording for the BIP65 stuff.
< Luke-Jr>
hopefully this will be the last ISM hack
< btcdrak>
We probably want to mention something about the mempool median-past-locktime policy too so miners are aware of it.
< harding>
btcdrak: yes, I'm doing that now; it's harder to write than I thought. :-)
< harding>
(At least, keeping it concise is harder than I thought.)
< btcdrak>
well it's probably just better to point them to BIP113
< harding>
I'm doing that too, of course. :-)
< GitHub174>
[bitcoin] harding opened pull request #6968: [Docs] First-draft release notes for 0.11.2RC1 (0.11...release-notes-0.11.2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6968
< gmaxwell>
Has someone actually compared MTP to blocktime over the history of the bitcoin network to figure out what the median correction is precisely?