00:19 < Luke-Jr> wumpus: FWIW, most of the base58 optimisation was already in practice in libbase58 (although implemented differently)

07:22 < la> http://oortr.com/ZjllYz

11:02 < GitHub34> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #7721: [qa] Use print() in rpc tests (master...Mf1603-qaPy3print) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7721

18:01 < GitHub187> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #7723: build: python 3 compatibility (master...2016_03_build_python_3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7723

22:13 < BCB> why isn't 8333 an iana registered port?

22:25 < Ylbam> simple question: will BIP9 be used for SW deployment?

22:32 < sipa> Ylbam: yes, that's next on the todo list: uodate the segwit code to be bip9 based

22:33 < sipa> *update

22:33 < Ylbam> ok thanx sipa

22:37 < Ylbam> sipa: it looks like BIP9 requires a 95% consensus for activation, are you feeling concerned about Classic mining currently being above the 5% veto threshold?

22:38 < Ylbam> SF activations I mean

22:40 < sipa> SW is a softfork, it's up to miners to choose to adopt it, not up to me

22:42 < Ylbam> sipa: ok, so nothing special planned here, hoping we won't get stalled

23:37 < sipa> wumpus, jonasschnelli: is there any way to check what datadir a Bitcoin-Qt was configured to use?

23:59 < morcos> sipa: you know there is a QT settings file somewhere right?