< fanquake>
Is there going to be a 0.11.3 release at the same time as 0.12.1 ?
< cfields>
gitian builders: 0.12.1 sigs are up
< cfields>
gmaxwell: you might get your wish, we got 5 matches pretty quickly for this one :)
< fanquake1>
cfields What's the wish?
< cfields>
fanquake1: tag/release same day
< fanquake1>
cfields That'd be nice. Have pushed my signed sigs up, hopefully we get some matches.
< cfields>
fanquake1: matches mine :)
< achow101>
doing my builds right now
< cfields>
achow101: matched, thanks
< fanquake1>
cfields while your around, are we doing a 0.11.3 release?
< cfields>
fanquake1: i'm not sure what the resolution was there, it was debated because of the difficulty in safely backporting the new stuff. It was discussed in last week's meeting (or the week before?)
< cfields>
fanquake1: i suspect it'll depend on demand
< fanquake1>
cfields No worries. Was just curious as to wether I'd need to create any more sigs.
< btcdrak>
good grief that was the fastest round of gitian building I have ever witnessed. It's only been 12 hours.
< sipa>
damn
< sipa>
i feel left out
< jl2012>
just done gitian building and I'm already the 8th
< jl2012>
any conclusion for the sha256 vs sha256d for P2WSH?
< sipa>
jl2012: i prefer not changing it anymore at this point
< sipa>
.
< sipa>
it's an easy thing to vhange, but i also don't think it adds much
< jl2012>
I think so. And v0 witness program will be replaced by v1 with MAST and Schnorr. The economic incentive will push most people to adopt the v1
< jl2012>
v0 is just a transition
< sipa>
well, maybe
< sipa>
we never know how long things stick around
< jl2012>
that's also good: that means the tx fee is still too low
< GitHub60>
[bitcoin] dooglus opened pull request #7880: Optional parameter to fundrawtransaction: specify change address explicitly (master...fundrawtransaction-specify-change-address) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7880
< wumpus>
there are not supposed to be code changes between the last rc and final, otherwise they wouldn't have been tested in a rc :)
< cjcj>
Aha! TIL :)
< wumpus>
the binaries are recompiled, because the built-in tags/version/commit id is different, but that should be the only difference
< Ylbam>
\o/
< Luke-Jr>
Thanks for subscribing to the Bitcoin Core announcements list. Please confirm your subscription by clicking the link below: <-- the irony that the email goes out of its way to make the link un-clickable.. btcdrak
< btcdrak>
Luke-Jr: oh?
< btcdrak>
PM
< btcdrak>
luke-jr: fixed.
< btcdrak>
it only affected strict HTML clients, it seems some email clients auto render URLs even without hyperlink tags.
< sipa>
and still, every few weeks, someone subscribes to the sf list...
< sipa>
they get an automatic notification to go look elsewhere
< GitHub77>
bitcoin/master 509cb00 Wladimir J. van der Laan: txdb: Add Cursor() method to CCoinsView to iterate over UTXO set...
< GitHub77>
bitcoin/master 9e47fce Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7756: Add cursor to iterate over utxo set, use this in `gettxoutsetinfo`...
< GitHub32>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7756: Add cursor to iterate over utxo set, use this in `gettxoutsetinfo` (master...2016_03_utxo_cursor) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7756