00:33 < sdaftuar> Anyone know how to interpret this CI failure: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4642327564124160 ?

00:36 < fanquake> I seem to get a 404 for one of the logs, and the other doesn't download

00:40 < sdaftuar> i'm rerunning the job to try to get a passing CI suite for the related PR, but i can't tell if this is an error i should be opening an issue for so we can track, or if this is some known issue or what

00:40 < sdaftuar> (or maybe my pr is broken)

00:41 < sipa> this looks like it could just be the CI infrastructure machine failing or so

00:43 < fanquake> Maybe we'll be down to 1/3 CI's by the end of today

00:45 < sipa> obligatory xkcd 605 reference

00:45 < fanquake> up and to the right

02:40 < sipa> sdaftuar: seems ok now

05:20 < S3RK> Hello. Is there a command to list all descriptors imported into a wallet?

09:05 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Saibato opened pull request #20091: doc: reflect the current status of Tor support. (master...pr-351-doc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20091

11:01 < hebasto> are we going to keep compatibility with WSL 1 ? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/compare-versions

11:39 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #20092: util: Do not use gArgs global in ArgsManager::GetHelpMessage (master...201006-gargs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20092

11:55 < jnewbery> hi folks, it's an odd numbered week of the year, and it's a Tuesday, which means that there's a P2P meeting (in about 3 hours). No proposed topics yet. Feel free to update https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/P2P-IRC-meetings#06-oct-2020 if you want to discuss something.

11:55 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/06 | Treat wallet as a generic keystore · Issue #6 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

12:02 < fanquake> hebasto: what has changed that we'd need to worry about. I think we've already merged one compatibility related PR

12:05 < hebasto> fanquake: do you mean #18700 ?

12:05 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18700 | Fix locking on WSL using flock instead of fcntl by meshcollider · Pull Request #18700 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

12:06 < fanquake> Yea that's probably what I was thinking of given the WS2 discussion at the end of the thread

12:07 < hebasto> the initial bug is fixed (or not applied to) in WSL 2 -- https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/1927

13:38 < dr-orlovsky> Any plans to add pay-to-contract and sign-to-contract tweak information into PSBT key types?

15:00 < jnewbery> #startmeeting

15:00 < lightningbot> Meeting started Tue Oct 6 15:00:15 2020 UTC. The chair is jnewbery. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.

15:00 < lightningbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.

15:00 < jnewbery> #bitcoin-core-dev P2P Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier jl2012 achow101 meshcollider jnewbery maaku fanquake promag provoostenator aj Chris_Stewart_5 dongcarl gwillen jamesob ken281221 ryanofsky gleb moneyball kvaciral ariard digi_james

15:00 < hebasto> hi

15:00 < jnewbery> amiti fjahr jeremyrubin lightlike emilengler jonatack hebasto jb55 elichai2

15:00 < dhruvm> hi

15:00 < ariard> hi

15:00 < gleb> hi

15:01 < jnewbery> Hi folks. Welcome to the P2P party!

15:01 < nehan> hi

15:01 < jnewbery> No suggested topics today: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/P2P-IRC-meetings#06-oct-2020

15:01 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/06 | Treat wallet as a generic keystore · Issue #6 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

15:01 < luke-jr> party? where's the pizza?

15:01 < jnewbery> Couple of reminders/public announcements. 1. Feature freeze is in 9 (NINE) days: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18947

15:01 < sipa> hi

15:02 < jnewbery> 2. AJ has been maintaining a project board of p2p issues/PRs here: https://github.com/users/ajtowns/projects/1. It's a good overview of all the p2p activity in the repo.

15:02 < sdaftuar> hello

15:02 < amiti> hi

15:02 < jonatack> hi

15:02 < jnewbery> anyone have any topic suggestions? Anything they want to share?

15:03 < Murch> hello

15:03 < gleb> aj: the board looks great, I'll see if it helps my review process somehow :)

15:03 < nehan> is there a good way to extract hi priority for review for p2p?

15:04 < jonatack> pls test #19954

15:04 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19954 | tor: complete the TORv3 implementation by vasild · Pull Request #19954 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

15:04 < gleb> #19988 is probably the highest priority right now...

15:04 < vasild> hi

15:04 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19988 | Overhaul transaction request logic by sipa · Pull Request #19988 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

15:04 < jnewbery> nehan: you mean the intersection of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/8 and P2P PRs?

15:04 < jonatack> gleb: agree, along with taproot and tor v3

15:05 < jnewbery> or were you speaking more generally?

15:05 < nehan> jnewbery: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/8 doesn't have 19988 on it, for example, so i'm not sure i trust it for p2p

15:05 < hebasto> p2p roadmap?

15:06 < nehan> jnewbery: ignore me. I can't read :)

15:06 < jnewbery> nehan: I think it should! I've just added it

15:07 < jnewbery> I think general consensus is the high priority PRs right now are taproot, tx request overhaul and torv3. It'd be great if they could all land before feature freeze

15:08 < jnewbery> last call for suggested topics!

15:08 < jnewbery> great. short meetings are the best meetings. They leave more time for taproot review

15:09 < jonatack> ^

15:09 < jnewbery> #endmeeting

15:09 < lightningbot> Meeting ended Tue Oct 6 15:09:16 2020 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)

15:09 < lightningbot> Minutes: http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2020/bitcoin-core-dev.2020-10-06-15.00.html

15:09 < lightningbot> Minutes (text): http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2020/bitcoin-core-dev.2020-10-06-15.00.txt

15:09 < lightningbot> Log: http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2020/bitcoin-core-dev.2020-10-06-15.00.log.html

15:09 < sipa> bye

15:09 < sdaftuar> ack

16:47 < achow101> ryanofsky: would you like to have a dicussion about wallet.dat vs wallet.sqlite?

17:52 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #20094: wallet, log, qa: Unify wallet directory lock error message (master...201006-name) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20094

18:19 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipsorcery opened pull request #20095: CI: Bump vcpkg commit ID to get new msys mirror list (master...vcpkg_commitid_bump) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20095

19:01 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/875e1ccc9fe0...d8cd7b137fb0

19:01 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master c83155b Aaron Clauson: Bump vcpkg commit ID to get new msys mirror list

19:01 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master d8cd7b1 Pieter Wuille: Merge #20095: CI: Bump vcpkg commit ID to get new msys mirror list

19:01 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa merged pull request #20095: CI: Bump vcpkg commit ID to get new msys mirror list (master...vcpkg_commitid_bump) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20095

19:01 < hebasto> sipa: activate appveyor hook?

19:03 < hebasto> oh sorry, missed your comment in pr

19:05 < sipa> hebasto: already done

19:05 < sipa> if someone updates a PR without rebasing on master they may still see the issue, though

22:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #19988: Overhaul transaction request logic (master...202009_txrequest_rand_wtxid) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19988

22:06 < sipa> oops

22:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa reopened pull request #19988: Overhaul transaction request logic (master...202009_txrequest_rand_wtxid) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19988

22:31 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #20096: wallet: Remove WalletDatabase refcounting and enforce only one Batch access the database at a time (master...rm-bdb-refcount) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20096

22:59 < aj> sipa: should 20027 be mentioning 19988 in its description, rather than 19989?

23:06 < sipa> aj: of course!