< GitHub37> [bitcoin] jtimon closed pull request #6625: BLOCKING: Consensus: Move blocksize and related parameters to consensusparams ...without removing consensus/consensus.h [#6526 alternative] (master...consensus-blocksize-0.12.99) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6625
< GitHub39> [bitcoin] jtimon closed pull request #6597: Chainparams: Don't check the genesis block (master...chainparams-genesis-no-check-0.12.99) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6597
< GitHub122> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 7 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/cd3f12c61ca5...8ea5ef1d3994
< GitHub122> bitcoin/master 9e940fa fanquake: [depends] Boost 1.59.0
< GitHub122> bitcoin/master 17ad964 fanquake: [depends] miniupnpc 1.9.20151026
< GitHub122> bitcoin/master 26f8ea5 fanquake: [depends] native ccache 3.2.4
< GitHub64> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6980: [Depends] Bump Boost, miniupnpc, ccache & zeromq (master...depends-bump-boost) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6980
< wumpus> sdaftuar: yes I thought about adding checking the rejectresult in some more tests, but postponed it to a later pull, thanks for adding some in #7226
< GitHub49> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.12: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/eccd67106d7ebfcb1d0913c2036848f57ba344fb
< GitHub49> bitcoin/0.12 eccd671 fanquake: [Depends] Bump Boost, miniupnpc, ccache & zeromq...
< GitHub123> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #7229: [qa] wallet: Check if maintenance changes the balance (master...MarcoFalke-2015-rpcWalletMaintenance) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7229
< GitHub105> [bitcoin] jgarzik opened pull request #7230: BIP 202: 2mb blocksize step (master...2015_2mb_blocksize_step) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7230
< JackH> hi wumpus how far is CSV from inclusion in core?
< morcos> JackH: one thing that would help is people reviewing #7184 as I think this is the preferred implementation approach but certainly hasn't gotten enough eyes
< JackH> can you link me morcos
< morcos> It seems resonable to me that within a month or two of releasing 0.12 we ought to be able to release a soft fork patch for BIP68
< morcos> Thats actually fro BIP 68
< morcos> we still need lots of eyes on the CSV code too
< morcos> not sure which pull number that is
< morcos> Basically the old up in all of this at this point is more review and other things taking attention
< morcos> hold up that is
< btcdrak> morcos: shall we close 6312 yet?
< morcos> btcdrak: i don't think yet, lets wait till we get a few more ACK's on the switch of approach
< btcdrak> paging sipa *duck*
< btcdrak> *ducks*
< btcdrak> JackH: #6564 is the CSV patch specifically, although we need BIP68 as well.
< btcdrak> (and BIP113 must be activated with BIP68)
< GitHub159> [bitcoin] instagibbs opened pull request #7232: Added help text for chainwork value (master...getblockhelp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7232
< GitHub39> [bitcoin] jtimon reopened pull request #6625: BLOCKING: Consensus: Move blocksize and related parameters to consensusparams ...without removing consensus/consensus.h [#6526 alternative] (master...consensus-blocksize-0.12.99) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6625
< GitHub169> [bitcoin] jtimon reopened pull request #6597: Chainparams: Don't check the genesis block (master...chainparams-genesis-no-check-0.12.99) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6597