< GitHub164> [bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #8484: More granular debug (master...MoreGranularDebug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8484
< GitHub11> [bitcoin] mhughes30 opened pull request #8485: bitcoin_0.13 (0.13...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8485
< GitHub115> [bitcoin] mhughes30 closed pull request #8485: bitcoin_0.13 (0.13...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8485
< jonasschnelli> Adding something that could be called "detached signing" to bitcoin-core, would that require a BIP? Idea: during signing of a transaction, wallet can call/pipe a executable, send some transaction relevant information, wait for response, done.
< jonasschnelli> The same thing would work for smartphones (in case of a BIP) by using URL schemas (bitcointxsigning://<data>)
< btcdrak> jonasschnelli: I was also thinking about this problem, specially in relation to multi party signing.
< jonasschnelli> btcdrak: I was looking at it from a key/wallet separation point (hardware wallets). But I agree, you could also have some clever p2p network that could manage getting additional signatures in a ms
< btcdrak> With the exception of Copay which relies on a centralised server which stored xpubs, there doesnt really seem to be a p2p, privacy conscious solution.
< jonasschnelli> btcdrak: Right. Electrum also uses a centralized server...
< jonasschnelli> But I guess it's hard to cover this in a p2p network
< btcdrak> jonasschnelli: true, but multisig signing in any case is a total bear currently. It's no wonder that centralised services are able to sell themselves here.
< GitHub19> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8486: [wallet] Add high transaction fee warnings (master...Mf1607-walletHighFeeWarn) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8486
< btcdrak> There is a website PR for the release, please can you review it https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/199
< Chris_Stewart_5> What is the real world use case for putting things like digital signatures/pubkeys inside a scriptSig into a bloom fitler?
< sipa> Chris_Stewart_5: bip37
< GitHub104> [bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #8487: Persist the datadir after option reset (master...persist-datadir) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8487
< GitHub143> [bitcoin] maaku opened pull request #8488: Add deleteprivkey and forgetaddress RPC calls (master...forgetaddress-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8488
< achow101> cross compiling master for windows is throwing me a ton of errors for stuff in httpserver.cpp
< jonasschnelli> achow101: in case you want to compare the build log: https://bitcoin.jonasschnelli.ch/nightlybuilds/2016-08-08/build-win.log
< achow101> jonasschnelli: well the difference is that my build is failing
< achow101> i'll try rebuilding the depends
< GitHub3> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8489: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT) (master...bugfix_gbt_sigops_presegwit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8489
< GitHub37> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8490: [0.13] release notes: Mention new relevance of non-mining nodes on network policy; s/HD/D/; and misc fixes (0.13...relnotes_013_misc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8490
< GitHub63> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin closed pull request #8464: "Lockfree" Checkqueue Implementation (master...lockfree-checkqueue-squashed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8464
< GitHub30> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin reopened pull request #8464: "Lockfree" Checkqueue Implementation (master...lockfree-checkqueue-squashed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8464