03:25 < GitHub164> [bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #8484: More granular debug (master...MoreGranularDebug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8484

04:41 < GitHub11> [bitcoin] mhughes30 opened pull request #8485: bitcoin_0.13 (0.13...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8485

04:41 < GitHub115> [bitcoin] mhughes30 closed pull request #8485: bitcoin_0.13 (0.13...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8485

11:28 < jonasschnelli> Adding something that could be called "detached signing" to bitcoin-core, would that require a BIP? Idea: during signing of a transaction, wallet can call/pipe a executable, send some transaction relevant information, wait for response, done.

11:29 < jonasschnelli> The same thing would work for smartphones (in case of a BIP) by using URL schemas (bitcointxsigning://<data>)

11:33 < btcdrak> jonasschnelli: I was also thinking about this problem, specially in relation to multi party signing.

11:34 < jonasschnelli> btcdrak: I was looking at it from a key/wallet separation point (hardware wallets). But I agree, you could also have some clever p2p network that could manage getting additional signatures in a ms

11:35 < btcdrak> With the exception of Copay which relies on a centralised server which stored xpubs, there doesnt really seem to be a p2p, privacy conscious solution.

11:38 < jonasschnelli> btcdrak: Right. Electrum also uses a centralized server...

11:38 < jonasschnelli> But I guess it's hard to cover this in a p2p network

11:39 < btcdrak> jonasschnelli: true, but multisig signing in any case is a total bear currently. It's no wonder that centralised services are able to sell themselves here.

13:50 < GitHub19> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #8486: [wallet] Add high transaction fee warnings (master...Mf1607-walletHighFeeWarn) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8486

15:10 < btcdrak> There is a website PR for the release, please can you review it https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/199

17:23 < Chris_Stewart_5> What is the real world use case for putting things like digital signatures/pubkeys inside a scriptSig into a bloom fitler?

17:24 < Chris_Stewart_5> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/bloom.cpp#L198

17:43 < sipa> Chris_Stewart_5: bip37

18:27 < GitHub104> [bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #8487: Persist the datadir after option reset (master...persist-datadir) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8487

18:33 < GitHub143> [bitcoin] maaku opened pull request #8488: Add deleteprivkey and forgetaddress RPC calls (master...forgetaddress-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8488

19:06 < achow101> cross compiling master for windows is throwing me a ton of errors for stuff in httpserver.cpp

20:33 < jonasschnelli> achow101: in case you want to compare the build log: https://bitcoin.jonasschnelli.ch/nightlybuilds/2016-08-08/build-win.log

21:45 < achow101> jonasschnelli: well the difference is that my build is failing

21:45 < achow101> i'll try rebuilding the depends

22:01 < GitHub3> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8489: Bugfix: Use pre-BIP141 sigops until segwit activates (GBT) (master...bugfix_gbt_sigops_presegwit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8489

22:16 < GitHub37> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #8490: [0.13] release notes: Mention new relevance of non-mining nodes on network policy; s/HD/D/; and misc fixes (0.13...relnotes_013_misc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8490

22:29 < GitHub63> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin closed pull request #8464: "Lockfree" Checkqueue Implementation (master...lockfree-checkqueue-squashed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8464

22:29 < GitHub30> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin reopened pull request #8464: "Lockfree" Checkqueue Implementation (master...lockfree-checkqueue-squashed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8464