< achow101>
what do you all think of the release notes so far? Is there anything else to add?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9674: Lock cs_vSend and cs_inventory in a consistent order even in TRY (master...2017-02-inv-send-lockorder) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9674
< luke-jr>
hm, I guess rawtx ought not use -walletrbf as a default
< ossifrage>
So I was just trying to do a send and bitcoin-qt crashed: 2017-02-03 04:32:10 GUI: QXcbConnection: XCB error: 3 (BadWindow), sequence: 15464, resource id: 64026419, major code: 40 (TranslateCoords), minor code: 0
< ossifrage>
2017-02-03 04:32:23 GUI: Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (version 0x50700) with this library (version 0x50701)
< ossifrage>
When I restarted the send did not show up as pending, but it very much was not a 'warm and fuzzy'
< ossifrage>
I'm using v0.13.2 built from the github git tree
< luke-jr>
ossifrage: sounds like you built it on another machine?
< ossifrage>
Nope, I built it on the same machine it was running
< ossifrage>
I'm not so worried that it crashed, but instead that the transaction was in limbo. When I restarted it did not show up as pending, so no harm done.
< ossifrage>
The client seemed to be just fine, it downloaded the full block chain and has run on and off for a few weeks, it didn't expire until I tried to do a send
< luke-jr>
I would assume it is still pending
< ossifrage>
luke-jr, when I restarted the client it did not show up in the transactions list and it did not show up as a negative pending value
< ossifrage>
I also didn't see anything in debug.log about a transaction. Is there a confirm dialog after clicking 'send'?
< luke-jr>
there usually is, yes; if you didn't confirm, you're safe
< ossifrage>
Yeah, I'd be a bit annoyed if I lost $570 to bitpay
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] kokifpen opened pull request #9675: Fix typo and spelling inconsistency in CONTRIBUTING.md (master...fix_typo_in_contributing) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9675
< luke-jr>
achow101: 8751 just got complex to rebase, but I'll have one you can pull in a sec
< luke-jr>
8704*
< achow101>
what's complex about it?
< luke-jr>
achow101: named params
< achow101>
oh
< luke-jr>
achow101: ok, pushed getblock-extraverbose to my repo; you can update your PR with: git checkout getblock-extraverbose && git fetch git://github.com/luke-jr/bitcoin getblock-extraverbose && git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD && git push …
< achow101>
done
< achow101>
the only thing that was complex about that was that there could be two named args?
< achow101>
(for the same thing)
< luke-jr>
yes
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9679: Access WorkQueue::running only within the cs lock (master...2017-02-workqueue-running-race) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9679