00:14
<
cfields >
sipa: mmm, i've built all that before when working on toolchain stuff. If you're interested i can clean that up and push it somewhere
00:14
<
cfields >
(i've promised it to warren anyway)
00:17
<
cfields >
gmaxwell: that test doesn't need a separate libstdc++. Just some defines. There's a doc that describes the gcc magic that makes that work.
03:59
<
gmaxwell >
wtf importmulti gives you no way to just import a private key with a date and a bounded rescan horizon? :(
04:14
<
sipa >
gmaxwell: ?
04:16
<
gmaxwell >
importmulti can't actually import a bare private key, requires a redeemscript.
04:16
<
sipa >
or an address ,yes
04:21
<
sipa >
because we shouldn't just infer what addresses credit us based on what keys
04:21
<
sipa >
i think that's the biggest mistake in the design of the wallet
04:21
<
sipa >
that ownership of addresses and possession of orivate keys are not separated things
14:19
<
luke-jr >
qt/test/paymentservertests.cpp:65:6: warning: stack protector not protecting local variables: variable length buffer [-Wstack-protector]
14:19
<
luke-jr >
^ are we trying to change these?
14:22
<
gmaxwell >
thats a dumb warning.
14:23
<
gmaxwell >
otoh we probably should avoid vararrays.
14:24
<
gmaxwell >
why is our configure scritpt ignoring CXXFLAGS ? :(
14:24
<
gmaxwell >
ah nevermind because it's failing.
16:53
<
sipa >
my bitcoind crashed due to a buffer overflow
16:59
<
paveljanik >
sipa, what commit hash?
16:59
<
paveljanik >
and how?
18:10
<
sipa >
paveljanik: unclesr
18:51
<
jl2012 >
with master, I find that all tests with setup_clean_chain = False failed on my MAC OS 10.12.2
18:52
<
jl2012 >
same error: Error loading block database.
20:08
<
bitcoin-git >
bitcoin/master 003cd60 Matt Corallo: Add missing mempool lock for CalculateMemPoolAncestors
20:08
<
bitcoin-git >
bitcoin/master 923dc44 Pieter Wuille: Merge #9578: Add missing mempool lock for CalculateMemPoolAncestors...
21:39
<
MarcoFalke_ >
jl2012: Try deleting the qa cache dir
23:26
<
luke-jr >
wumpus: we should have taken advantage of the named arguments to switch amounts to satoshis..
23:27
<
* luke-jr >
wonders if we can get broad agreement that this would be okay to throw in now, considering if we don't, we'll be stuck supporting BTC values longer..