< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] schildbach opened pull request #10679: Document the non-DER-conformance of one test in tx_valid.json. (master...tx-valid-comment) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10679
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MeshCollider opened pull request #10680: Fix inconsistencies and grammar in various files (master...fix_typos_and_inconsistencies) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10680
< wumpus>
for a hardfork you certainly need a BIP first
< wumpus>
which needs to be discussed, and there needs to be wide agreement on it, only then it makes sense to PR it
< luke-jr>
right, I just mean whether it could get done, or would encounter politics for some reason
< wumpus>
i'm sure it will encounter politics, but that shouldn't affect whether to do a proposal
< luke-jr>
no point proposing something doomed to fail
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master c074752 Ricardo Velhote: [RPC] Add an uptime command that displays the amount of time that bitcoind has been running
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 1680ee0 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10400: [RPC] Add an uptime command that displays the amount of time (in seconds) bitcoind has been running...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master e7ba6c1 John Newbery: [tests] add example test
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 7c87a9c Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10612: The young person's guide to the test_framework...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10612: The young person's guide to the test_framework (master...templatefunctionaltest) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10612
< jnewbery>
jtimon: I've been away for the last week but it looks like no-one gave you the most obvious answer to your question
< jnewbery>
> what's the simplest way to find out whoch commit deleted a given variable, say, pwalletMain
< jnewbery>
git log -S<string>
< jnewbery>
wumpus jcorgan : I think this is easier than git bisect/grep ^^
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] esneider opened pull request #10682: Trivial: Move the AreInputsStandard documentation next to its implementation (master...move-doc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10682
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #10683: rpc: Move the `generate` RPC call to rpcwallet (master...2017_06_wallet_mining) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10683
< wumpus>
Chris_Stewart_5: no, the coinbase tx can have arbitrary outputs like any transaction
< wumpus>
(the amount just needs to be <= blockreward+fees)
< wumpus>
jnewbery: forgot about -S
< Chris_Stewart_5>
Is there any strong feelings on constraining the miner output to be at index 0? I'm working on a drivechain proposal BIP that would do this... and fix the witness commitment at index 1
< wumpus>
some mining pools pay out to multiple parties in the coinbase transaction, I think that would be broken then?