< wumpus>
I've updated the bitcoin/frequent-contributors bitcoin-core/frequent-contributors to have the same people in it, so if you get a seemingly spurious invite that's the reason
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #18298: build: Fix Qt processing of configure script for depends with DEBUG=1 (master...20200309-depends-debug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18298
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto reopened pull request #18298: build: Fix Qt processing of configure script for depends with DEBUG=1 (master...20200309-depends-debug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18298
< elichai2>
wumpus: FYI, why is there still bitcoin and bitcoin-core as different orgs? (I mistype sometimes when I move between secp and bitcoin)
< wumpus>
elichai2: because it seems better to keep bitcoin/bitcoin there for now
< wumpus>
there's no way to create a permanent redirect on github, all solutions to that basically suck
< wumpus>
but all new repositories are created under bitcoin-core, at some point, if enough things split off from the main codebase, at some point maybe only the consensus code (and bips) will be left under bitcoin
< wumpus>
that would be my personal preference at least, to have all active development happen under bitcoin-core and (lower traffic, but critical) "specs"/protocol work remain under bitcoin
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #19295: refactor: Use AbortError in FatalError (master...2006-refactorAbortError) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19295
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #19296: tests: Add fuzzing harness for AES{CBC,}256{Encrypt,Decrypt} (crypto/aes.h) (master...fuzzers-more-crypto) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19296
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] glowang opened pull request #19297: [test] WIP: rewrite generate() in test_node to gain determinism in test data (master...2020/05/21/rewrite_generate_in_testnode) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19297
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #19251: [Do Not Merge] ci: Temporary Test Case for negative capabilities in the Clang Thread Safety annotations (master...200611-dnm-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19251
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 968aaae fanquake: tests: run test-security-check.py in CI
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 9fe71a5 fanquake: test: use subprocess.run() in test-security-check.py
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master f658c15 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #18434: tests: add a test-security target and run it in CI
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #18434: tests: add a test-security target and run it in CI (master...run_security_check_ci) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18434
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 44cc75f Karl-Johan Alm: wallet: error if an explicit fee rate was given but the needed fee rate di...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 23b2a68 MarcoFalke: Merge #18275: wallet: error if an explicit fee rate was given but the need...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18275: wallet: error if an explicit fee rate was given but the needed fee rate differed (master...2003-wallet-error-on-feechange) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18275
< achow101>
<wumpus> there's no way to create a permanent redirect on github, all solutions to that basically suck <--- No? Moving a repo wil permanently redirect the old location to the new one. Even the git urls so existing contributors don't need to change anything
< achow101>
e.g. HWI used to be achow101/HWI and achow101/HWI now permanently redirects to bitcoin-core/HWI
< wumpus>
fairly sure that ends after a while
< achow101>
I don't think so
< wumpus>
in any case I still hope for a future separation between consensus code and the rest of the implementation makes sense, and maybe it fits this split