< achow101> for rpc tests, how can I be sure that a transaction makes it into the next block mined?
< GitHub177> [bitcoin] domob1812 opened pull request #7983: Use std::unique_ptr instead of auto_ptr. (master...unique-ptr) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7983
< phantomcircuit> for come reason linking fails with a PIC error when trying to use if (!CheckBlock(block, state, false, false)) {return 0;}
< sipa> eh
< sipa> tried git clean, make clean, ccache -C, autogen, ...?
< phantomcircuit> sipa, yeah
< phantomcircuit> haven't tried ccache -C
< phantomcircuit> ccache is not installed
< sipa> ok, then no worries
< sipa> (though i suggest installing it)
< phantomcircuit> infinity core machine i dont think it matters very much
< sipa> you would be surprised
< phantomcircuit> https://0bin.net/paste/oShOvFiSUJkCibPo#ebHQhfyJP7giVT5-nf+r4XHn87VQDxZsp49zsJJ8XK0
< phantomcircuit> (i'll try again without afl)
< phantomcircuit> nope removing afl was useless
< GitHub27> [bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #7984: Optional parameter for rescans to start at a specified height (master...rescan-fromheight) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7984
< phantomcircuit> this repo hasn't been updated in a very long time
< phantomcircuit> and there's the qa and doc directories in bitcoin/bitcoin
< phantomcircuit> i think it should go bye bye
< phantomcircuit> opinions?
< phantomcircuit> on a completely unrelated note
< phantomcircuit> anybody know why this would fail like this?
< phantomcircuit> https://0bin.net/paste/oShOvFiSUJkCibPo#ebHQhfyJP7giVT5-nf+r4XHn87VQDxZsp49zsJJ8XK0
< phantomcircuit> specifically the issue is something to do with PIE vs PIC building bitcoin-fuzzy with a CheckBlock call