< assder>
Are you planning to move from bitcoin to bitcoin-core on github?
< wumpus>
that's the plan, eventually, yes
< wumpus>
all the sub-repositories have been moved, just not the main one
< assder>
When is it planned to occur? Has it to do with the recent drama?
< wumpus>
no, it was planned for a long time, and I don't see it happening any time soon
< assder>
Can you move all PRs and activity from one repo to another?
< wumpus>
yes
< wumpus>
and it automatically creates a redirect
< wumpus>
(if you move the entire repository from one place to another, PRs and such move with it)
< assder>
Ok. Thanks for the answers.
< Chris_Stewart_5>
In tx_valid.json, is there a convention that assumes that the first outpoint corresponds to the first input in the serialized tx being tested?
< Guest7895>
see the comments at the top of the file
< GitHub30>
bitcoin/master d90351f Gregory Maxwell: More comments on the design of AttemptToEvictConnection....
< GitHub30>
bitcoin/master 8206835 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7974: More comments on the design of AttemptToEvictConnection....
< GitHub37>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7974: More comments on the design of AttemptToEvictConnection. (master...attempt_to_evict_comment) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7974
< Chris_Stewart_5>
Guest7895: Where does it indicate this is the case?
< Guest7895>
Chris_Stewart_5: sorry, i'm confusing it with script_test.json
< morcos>
BlueMatt: gmaxwell: do either of you have some more detailed stats on the 96% reduction based on txs that are already in your mempool. some earlier tests i was doing were finding closer to 91% of the bytes in a block were already in my mempool, so i'd like to understand the discrepancy.
< gmaxwell>
morcos: I assume the discrepency is just network behavior when measuring. I got roughly the same number on couple day averages seperated by a couple weeks; but some spam attack or change in miner software would no doubt change it.
< gmaxwell>
it's also uptime related, as I get much lower number for the first day or two after restart, which are excluded.
< morcos>
yeah thats possible, my tests were less recent than yours i think
< gmaxwell>
(I think my last two measurements were 96% and 97%)
< gmaxwell>
My numbers are actually higher in comparison than just 'in mempool' since the bytes to send the shortids (typically around 20k for a 1MB block) count against it.
< michagogo>
Has anyone by any chance tried to use gitian on Xenial?
< michagogo>
Or for that matter, anything newer than Trusty?
< Jimbo_>
Hi everyone. I'm getting a stable crash from bitcoin-qt.exe on WinXP. Is this platform still supported
< Jimbo_>
?
< Chris_Stewart_5>
Are these transactions treated the same for signatures because CScript::FindAndDelete removes the remaining operations in the script for when we run OP_CHECKSIG?
< Chris_Stewart_5>
also, can anyone point to an example that serializes a CScript to stdout?
< GitHub55>
[bitcoin] avar opened pull request #8003: Get rid of a compiler warning due to #if 0'd test (master...fix-unused-function-compiler-warning) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8003