10:15 < GitHub108> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #8323: Add HD keypath to CKeyMetadata, report metadata in validateaddress (master...2016/07/hd_013) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8323

10:15 < jonasschnelli> I think we should consider #8323 (+37 −1) for 0.13

10:16 < GitHub29> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #8205: [Wallet] add HD keypath to CKeyMetadata, report over validateaddress (master...2016/06/hd_metadata) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8205

11:03 < GitHub121> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #8324: [Wallet] keep HD seed during salvagewallet (master...2016/07/hd_salvage) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8324

14:47 < GitHub68> [bitcoin] Pranit-Harekar opened pull request #8325: 0.12 (master...0.12) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8325

14:59 < GitHub44> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8325: 0.12 (master...0.12) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8325

15:49 < btcdrak> Happy Halving Countdown https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovXOZjxFB00

23:48 < sipa> http://bitcoin.sipa.be/utxo_size.png

23:55 < petertodd> sipa: what's the red represent/

23:55 < petertodd> ?

23:55 < petertodd> sipa: oh, under 1uBTC?

23:55 < sipa> yes

23:55 < petertodd> sipa: cool, thanks! mind if I link that from the blog post I'm writing?

23:55 < sipa> it is "what would the utxo set size be if we deleted all outputs below value X"

23:56 < petertodd> sipa: (as in, I'll make a copy of it today, and then link w/ a URL for the live version)

23:57 < sipa> the graph is not being automatically updated (yet)

23:57 < sipa> so feel free

23:57 < petertodd> sipa: thanks!

23:58 < sipa> i guess there is possible ambiguity: every vertical crosscut of the graph represents the entire UTXO set as it was at the date shown by the X axis

23:58 < sipa> it's not a breakdown of the current UTXO set by when the entries were created

23:59 < gmaxwell> I just suggested sipa create a breakdown one a little bit ago.