05:52 < Giszmo1> Hi. Anybody around to get me some testnet coins? >10 would be appreciated. Mycelium Virtual Trader ran out of coins and I'm in charge of feeding it now. Not exactly sure how DanielW handled this while he was in charge. mivtBy3ahEJTekcjRvXR2WDe6BRUtFYUpD

07:18 < Giszmo1> thank you for the anonymous donations. that balance of 5BTC should be good for some time now.

15:36 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] pavlosantoniou opened pull request #10471: Denote function CNode::GetRecvVersion() as const (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10471

17:41 < warren> jonasschnelli: btw, what is the status of BIP150 and BIP151 for core? do folks want to wait for the network rewrite?

17:42 < jcorgan> that was the last i heard, yes

17:43 < jcorgan> though i'd be interested in seeing what can be done in anticipation without having to redo from scratch once that happens

17:45 < warren> I ask now because of BIP154 which does have a reference implementation for current bitcoin.

17:53 < jcorgan> yeah, i see that now. looks like it is almost entirely new code and the changes in net.cpp itself are relatively small.

17:54 < warren> He wants conceptual feedback on BIP154 now.

17:58 < Eliel_> urm... is it just me or does listsinceblock seem to do something rather different from what it's documentation says it does? The documentation makes it seem like it never returns 0-conf transactions, but it actually returns all of them every time. It doesn't seem to make any difference what you specify for target_confirmations parameter.

17:59 < Eliel_> (0.13.2)

18:04 < sipa> Eliel_: i believe there is an open issue for that

18:22 < Eliel_> then again, it's probably more useful if it lists all 0 conf transactions every time.