< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #16991: qa: Fix service flag comparison check in rpc_net test (luke-jr) (master...2019_09_fix_servicenames_test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16991
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #16936: qa: Fix service flag comparison check in rpc_net test (master...fix_servicesnames_test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16936
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10615: RPC: Allow rpcauth configs to specify a 4th parameter naming a specific wallet (master...multiwallet_rpc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10615
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10823: Allow all mempool txs to be replaced after a configurable timeout (default 6h) (master...replace-by-fee-old-transactions) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10823
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master eb4c43e marcoagner: doc: documents how to calculate m_assumed_blockchain_size and m_assumed_ch...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 981ec9b Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #15459: doc: add how to calculate blockchain and chainstate size var...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #15459: doc: add how to calculate blockchain and chainstate size variables to release process (master...doc_blockchain_and_chainstate_size_calculation) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15459
< MarcoFalke>
heh, let me run my "close pull requests" DrahtBot script
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] DrahtBot closed pull request #15482: Implement BIPXXX's new softfork rules (The Great Consensus Cleanup) (master...2019-02-great-consensus-cleanup) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15482
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] DrahtBot closed pull request #13713: Ignore new blocks when -stopatheight target has been reached (master...2018/07/stopatheight) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13713
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] DrahtBot closed pull request #13674: Qt: Fix for bitcoin-qt becoming unresponsive during shutdown (issue #13217) (master...qt-shutdown-13217) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13674
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] DrahtBot closed pull request #12833: [qt] move QSettings to bitcoin_rw.conf where possible (master...2018/03/bitcoin-conf-rw) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12833
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 9c23ebd Luke Dashjr: qa: Fix service flag comparison check in rpc_net test
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master c3a8e09 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #16991: qa: Fix service flag comparison check in rpc_net test (luke-...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16991: qa: Fix service flag comparison check in rpc_net test (luke-jr) (master...2019_09_fix_servicenames_test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16991
< fanquake>
MarcoFalke: looks like you might need to address one of those PRs
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke reopened pull request #15482: Implement BIPXXX's new softfork rules (The Great Consensus Cleanup) (master...2019-02-great-consensus-cleanup) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15482
< promag>
MarcoFalke: you mean that all calls to GuessVerificationProgress without the lock happen at a point where nChainTx is already set?
< MarcoFalke>
promag: Yes, last time I checked they did
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #17000: tests: Add coverage test to verify that our fuzz harnesses reach different unique code paths when varying input (master...test_fuzzing_harnesses) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17000
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #17001: doc: Remove mention of renamed mapBlocksUnlinked (master...1909-docmapBlocksUnlinkedRenamed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17001
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #17004: validation: Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (master...2019-09-no-reject-validation-state) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17004
< elichai2>
I'm benchmarking a bunch of stuff. and I see something weird: `12.80% TxConfirmStats::UpdateMovingAverages `
< elichai2>
why does that function take so much time? especially in IBD when the fee data is pretty much irrelevant? (unless it already has the mempool and start calculating fees?)