< wumpus>
i'm afraid as bitcoin gets more popular we're going to have to get used to a certain percentage of spam and nonsense PRs which are out of scopre of the project, let's leave it at that
< wumpus>
to engage with those at all is to attract more of it, we've made our point, close and move on
< aj>
yep
< sipa>
indeed
< fanquake>
Is the merge bot taking a break, or has it never posted gui merges to this channel? thought I'd seen them before.
< wumpus>
hm let me check, i upgraded the OS on the server running the merge bot yesterday and it seemed to be running again, but let me check
< bitcoin-git>
[gui] MarcoFalke merged pull request #206: Display fRelayTxes and bip152_highbandwidth_{to, from} in peer details (master...add-fields-to-peer-details) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/206
< hebasto>
^ it works :)
< wumpus>
yes ! it was stuck though (due to a missing python module) so had to redeliver the event, it should be working again from now on
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fa55159 MarcoFalke: net: Log to net debug in MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect except for noban and...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 4b6ca4a MarcoFalke: Merge #20845: net: Log to net debug in MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect except...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #20845: net: Log to net debug in MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect except for noban and manual peers (master...2101-netLogDisconnect) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20845
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master ad5f01b Amiti Uttarwar: [validation] Move the lock annotation from function definition to declarat...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 25c57d6 Amiti Uttarwar: [doc] Add a note about where lock annotations should go.
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 34d7030 MarcoFalke: Merge #21202: [validation] Two small clang lock annotation improvements
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21202: [validation] Two small clang lock annotation improvements (master...2021-02-locks) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21202
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21263: doc: Clarify that squashing should happen before review (master...2102-docSquash) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21263
< jnewbery>
can gribble be changed to only match on boundary-hash-number-boundary instead of any substring with hash-number? Is there somewhere I can open a PR?