< bitcoin-git>
[gui] luke-jr opened pull request #368: Bugfix: GUI: When restoring table columns, still set their minimum column width and stretch on last section (master...bugfix_gui_restored_columns_stretch) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/368
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] S3RK opened pull request #22334: wallet: do not spam about non-existent spk managers (master...stop_non_existing_spkman_spam) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22334
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 177c15d Andrew Chow: Limit LegacyScriptPubKeyMan address types
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 0262536 Andrew Chow: Add OutputType::BECH32M
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 699dfcd Andrew Chow: Opportunistically use bech32m change addresses if available
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #22154: Add OutputType::BECH32M and related wallet support for fetching bech32m addresses (master...outputtype-bech32m) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22154
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] theStack opened pull request #22335: doc: recommend `--disable-external-signer` in OpenBSD build guide (master...202106-doc-openbsd_mention_missing_external_signer_support) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22335
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] kiminuo opened pull request #22336: [TESTBED][NO-MERGE][POC] Use std::filesystem. Remove Boost Filesystem & System (master...feature/use_std_filesystem_testbed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22336
< elichai2>
Is there any way in one of the interfaces(RPC/ZMQ etc.) to get either the fee of a mempool tx or the inputs values? (it should be possible because all mempool txs have their input's utxos)
< darosior>
elichai2: if you are sure it's in mempool then you can use 'getrawtransaction' without needing txindex
< darosior>
Then you can 'gettxout' each input i guess
< andytoshi>
MarcoFalke: just want to say thanks for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20560 ... i am merging (and build/test/fuzzing) all the 22.0 PRs from bitcoin into elements one-by-one, and the speedup building the fuzztests is *incredible*, i'm getting through PRs 25-30% faster
< sipa>
not needing to link 200 binaries does save some time yes :p
< sipa>
*150
< elichai2>
belcher: ohh thanks! idk how I missed that :)
< GIANTWORLDKEEPER>
anyone knows why ban on #bitcoin-core-dev at freenode?
< GIANTWORLDKEEPER>
i was silently reading and got banned
< GIANTWORLDKEEPER>
without explanations or rationales...
< GIANTWORLDKEEPER>
by the ChanServ.
< sipa>
we moved off freenode
< GIANTWORLDKEEPER>
that's ok
< GIANTWORLDKEEPER>
maybe a ban just to avoid splitting the community, who knows...
< GIANTWORLDKEEPER>
so that simply everyone has/have been banned
< laanwj>
the channel on freenode was taken over by the server admins there, no idea what they're doing to it, it's not us at least
< michaelfolkson>
Oh right feature freeze slipped a few days
< laanwj>
but yes it is a good week for some reviewing
< laanwj>
nevertheless :)
< sipa>
hey we're making progress
< jonatack>
always is
< laanwj>
#topic Super quick coredev update (ariard)
< core-meetingbot>
topic: Super quick coredev update (ariard)
< ariard>
hi
< ariard>
so a 1st feedback after last week, end of august is likely going to be too short to orga
< ariard>
october/november seem more realist, ideally around block 709632
< ariard>
and list of countries so far: south france/switzerland/portugal/praha/med country
< michaelfolkson>
I'm biased but Advancing Bitcoin might be a good candidate conference. Especially as it would want some Core devs to speak and is more technical
< laanwj>
agree, oct/nov is more realistic
< achow101>
michaelfolkson: when's that?
< ariard>
michaelfolkson: yes though date has been not fixed yet, afaict
< sipa>
where is advancing bitcoin?
< michaelfolkson>
Either later this year or early next year
< michaelfolkson>
I've contacted the organizer (Leon) and will hopefully hear back soon
< sipa>
well hard to plan things without knowing a date
< michaelfolkson>
Right, I'm chasing :)
< jonatack>
after oct we may see renewed restrictions if it's anything like last year
< jonasschnelli>
yes... probably
< jonasschnelli>
winter / cold / flu season
< sipa>
seems unlikely with the way vaccination is going in many places
< sipa>
on the other hand, who the hell knows
< ariard>
jonatack: that's a good point, thouhg if coredev is scheduled for nov, and restrictions happen beginning of oct
< jonasschnelli>
I wound't set it mandatory to organise it around an existing conf. Sure. would be better. But IMO works also standalone
< ariard>
we have enough time to work on fallback plan
< jonatack>
my guess is there's a semi-sure window in sept/oct, after all bets are off
< ariard>
one point to do it in standalone we can do it in nature (sea/mountain) instead of in a big city like london
< jonatack>
ariard: provided there is nearby international airport with decent connections
< michaelfolkson>
Yeah depends if you want a technical conference or not to organize around
< michaelfolkson>
I guess could organize an adhoc conference in nature
< ariard>
jonatack: yes international airport for sure!
< ariard>
anyway, moving forward on this and if we hit renewed restrictions at autumn, i'll try to figure out a fallback plan (in the limit of possible)
< laanwj>
thanks ariard
< michaelfolkson>
You're the self volunteered organizer ariard :) I'll let you know if I hear anything re London
< ariard>
michaelfolkson: thanks :)
< laanwj>
#topic 0.20.2 and 0.21.2 (achow101)
< core-meetingbot>
topic: 0.20.2 and 0.21.2 (achow101)
< achow101>
we should make 0.20.2 and 0.21.2 at some point
< achow101>
we already have 0.20.2rc2, I don't think anything has been added since?
< laanwj>
i don't think so
< achow101>
only change was updating signapple
< achow101>
which I don't think needs another rc
< laanwj>
nice, let's just tag 0.20.2 then, it's about time
< laanwj>
longest release cycle ever i think :)
< achow101>
0.21.2 would also be nice. 0.21.1 might have gotten less adoption due to the lack of windows cert
< laanwj>
and it would be good to get it out before 22.0 release, i think it's impossible to get anyone to care about it after that
< laanwj>
what's left to do for 0.21.2? any backport PRs?
< laanwj>
ok, so 0.20.2 final is basically ready, waiting for release notes (i'll do the authors and PR list), 0.21.2rc1 is waiting for a backport to be merged and a PR to be merged into master then backported
< Guest30>
Hi, I'm looking to contribute to this community and/or the bitcoin core codebase. What's the best way for me to get started? Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks!