< wumpus>
someone is trying to extort me, let it be clear that this is not an accepable email: "Hi all. I have the possibility of dos attacks, resistant to scoring ban, sending coins is not required. Can I get some coins? In particular, I would like 1 btc after demonstrating this, 1 btc after e
< wumpus>
xplaining how to do it and how to how to protect from this, and 1 btc to anyone else not to talk about. Reply to this email if you are interested."
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master ad04d1c Pieter Wuille: Always add default_witness_commitment with GBT client support
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 95f4a03 Suhas Daftuar: [qa] Test getblocktemplate default_witness_commitment
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master d932159 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9189: Always add default_witness_commitment with GBT client support...
< luke-jr>
wumpus: just ignore it IMO
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9189: Always add default_witness_commitment with GBT client support (master...alwayscommit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9189
< wumpus>
luke-jr: yea I won't waste any time on it, but want to be public about it
< sipa>
wumpus: i got the same ma
< sipa>
ma
< sipa>
maIL
< sipa>
and i haven't responded
< rabidus>
wow
< jonasschnelli>
wumpus: got the same mail..
< jonasschnelli>
won't reply to such "threats"...
< wumpus>
happy it was not targeted specifically at least
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #9219: doc: Improve windows build instructions using Linux subsystem (master...2016_11_windows_build_update) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9219
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #8983: WIP: Log block height and size when received (master...ShowBlockHeightAndSizeWhenReceived) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8983
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 5262a15 Daniel Cousens: tx_valid: re-order inputs to how they are encoded
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 97ec6e5 MarcoFalke: Merge #9100: tx_valid: re-order inputs to how they are encoded...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #9100: tx_valid: re-order inputs to how they are encoded (master...testorder) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9100
< MarcoFalke>
#9220 has same binaries, so fine to merge right now.
< jonasschnelli>
9143 leads to CWallet* free CWalletDB which allows compiling CWalletDB without circular dependencies which would allow writing a tool that could create / manipulate wallets
< jonasschnelli>
(next to a better class design)
< jonasschnelli>
MarcoFalke: Yes. 8776 should go in as well.. maybe wait for a final (ut)ACK from wumpus
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #8859: WIP: [qa] Add script to check for datadir compatibility between versions (master...Mf1610-qaCompat) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8859
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #9221: [qa] maxuploadtarget: Get rid of duplicate code (master...Mf1611-qaMaxUploadDuplCode) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9221
< Chris_Stewart_5>
So if you use the 'createrawtransactino' rpc, does this circumvent other flags you had set when starting bitcoind just as -walletrbf
< arubi>
Chris_Stewart_5, if you're specifying the inputs, then you should also specify the sequence. afaik createrawtransaction is not a wallet function. you could createrawtransaction with just the outputs, then fundrawtransaction, and you'll get the inputs with opt-in rbf sequence
< Chris_Stewart_5>
arubi: Thanks, yeah I was getting all maxed sequence numbers when using 'createrawtransaction' with -walletrbf set
< arubi>
well if you're already specifying the inputs verbatim, just use "<txid>:<index>:<sequence>" sequence is base 10..
< arubi>
or I guess, it takes json, add the "sequence" field. I just use bitcoin-tx :)
< Chris_Stewart_5>
arubi: I'm using sendtoaddress rpc command with rbf and creates a tx with sequence number 4294967294 which is 0xffffffff - 1. This seems to be contradictory to BIP 125 which says the seqeuence number needs to be < 0xffffffff -1
< Chris_Stewart_5>
with -walletrbf I should say
< arubi>
Chris_Stewart_5, right, I use 2^32-3. I think that's what core does too
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] dooglus opened pull request #9222: Add 'subtractFeeFromAmount' option to 'fundrawtransaction'. (master...subtractFeeFromAmount-in-fundraw) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9222