< roasbeef> thanks to those that updated their DNS seeds! am able to bootstrap a new client now w/o having to give it a bootstrap peer manually
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b499d8576f30...b799ebcc17ea
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0481fa2 Karl-Johan Alm: util: refactor upper/lowercase functions
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b799ebc fanquake: Merge #16566: util: refactor upper/lowercase functions
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #16566: util: refactor upper/lowercase functions (master...2019-08-casefuns-refactor) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16566
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] mech12 opened pull request #16593: block mining time : 1 -> 3second. (master...test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16593
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #16593: sorry test (master...test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16593
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #16595: travis: Bump timeout from 50 minutes to 90 (master...1908-travisNoTimeout) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16595
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] emilengler opened pull request #16596: rpc: Fix getblocktemplate CLI example (#16594) (master...2019-08-helpexamplecli-fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16596
< provoostenator> Why did Travis make their interface more confusing? I can't figure out how to build my a branch in my own fork of the bitcoin repo.
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Sjors opened pull request #16597: Travis: run full test suite on native macOS (master...2019/08/travis-macos) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16597
< pinheadmz> There's a surprising number of nodes on testnet stuck on a fork off the inflation bug "bad block"... looks like about 20 additional blocks were mined on top of it. I wodner why those nodes haven't been re-orged by the MUCH longer testnet chain
< provoostenator> Oh it's because Travis split itself between .org and .com
< luke-jr> provoostenator: it's always had that split?
< luke-jr> pinheadmz: IIRC the bug was such that it couldn't be reorged out of
< provoostenator> Maybe, but it prompted me to connect to Github, without pointing out that I already had the .org version connected.
< provoostenator> And without explaining why "bitcoin" was missing from the list of repos.
< elichai2> Two freaking functions with the same name one reverses the hash and one doesn't arghhhh
< luke-jr> kallewoof: does your explicit-fee branch even build for you? I get a complaint of duplicate default specification..
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] elichai opened pull request #16598: Renaming confusing hash256 function name in the tests (master...2019-08-rename-hash256) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16598