01:44 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jbampton opened pull request #17064: Simplify statement. (master...20191006-simplify-statement) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17064

01:50 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #17064: Simplify statement. (master...20191006-simplify-statement) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17064

02:49 < luke-jr> emilengler: that would require an organization, but Bitcoin Core is just an open source project, not an organization

02:50 < luke-jr> also, actually getting freenode to even reply about cloaks is … difficult to say the least

02:50 < emilengler> luke-jr: No, you don't need an org I think

02:50 < emilengler> 'They are designed to demonstrate that the user is connected to a project in some way. ' https://freenode.net/kb/answer/cloaks

02:50 < emilengler> project, not org

02:51 < luke-jr> also, why bother?

02:52 < emilengler> +1, but getting an unaffilated cloak was a 1 minute job. Don't know how it is with cloaks though

02:53 < emilengler> project cloaks*

02:53 < luke-jr> much harder

08:56 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 commit to 0.19: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/913972944b4f...3a7b2a15e3dd

08:56 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.19 3a7b2a1 Wladimir J. van der Laan: qt: Periodic translations update

08:57 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #17061: GUI: remove old translation files for 0.19 (0.19...transl-fix-19) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17061

10:44 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] martinus closed pull request #17063: [RFC] Tests: use boost test framework for benchmarks (master...2019-10-refactor-benchmark-framework) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17063

12:25 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #17066: build: Remove workaround for ancient libtool (master...20191006-rpath-issue) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17066

21:07 < danger8994> Hey

21:07 < danger8994> https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-reference#getreceivedbyaddress

21:08 < danger8994> So I tried: bitcoin-cli getreceivedbyaddress ""...

21:08 < danger8994> It says method not found

21:09 < danger89> so what now?

21:09 < danger89> does getreceivedbyaddress exists or not?

21:09 < danger89> according to the documentation it does!

21:11 < gwillen> are you sure you spelled it right? if you run "bitcoin-cli help" is getreceviedbyaddress listed?

21:11 < gwillen> ...see, I can't even spell it

21:42 < sipa> danger89: did you compile without wallet support?

22:32 < danger89> sipa: ah could that be it? I indeed set disablewallet=1

22:33 < danger89> I didn't know it was a wallet related API call

22:35 < danger89> sipa: No I didn't. I used the binary for Linux, given by github releases.

22:36 < danger89> but indeed the disablewallet was the issue ><

22:36 < danger89> sorry!

22:59 < sipa> danger89: it shows how much *your wallet* has received on a given address