< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jbampton opened pull request #17064: Simplify statement. (master...20191006-simplify-statement) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17064
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #17064: Simplify statement. (master...20191006-simplify-statement) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17064
< luke-jr> emilengler: that would require an organization, but Bitcoin Core is just an open source project, not an organization
< luke-jr> also, actually getting freenode to even reply about cloaks is … difficult to say the least
< emilengler> luke-jr: No, you don't need an org I think
< emilengler> 'They are designed to demonstrate that the user is connected to a project in some way. ' https://freenode.net/kb/answer/cloaks
< emilengler> project, not org
< luke-jr> also, why bother?
< emilengler> +1, but getting an unaffilated cloak was a 1 minute job. Don't know how it is with cloaks though
< emilengler> project cloaks*
< luke-jr> much harder
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 commit to 0.19: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/913972944b4f...3a7b2a15e3dd
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.19 3a7b2a1 Wladimir J. van der Laan: qt: Periodic translations update
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #17061: GUI: remove old translation files for 0.19 (0.19...transl-fix-19) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17061
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] martinus closed pull request #17063: [RFC] Tests: use boost test framework for benchmarks (master...2019-10-refactor-benchmark-framework) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17063
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #17066: build: Remove workaround for ancient libtool (master...20191006-rpath-issue) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17066
< danger8994> Hey
< danger8994> So I tried: bitcoin-cli getreceivedbyaddress ""...
< danger8994> It says method not found
< danger89> so what now?
< danger89> does getreceivedbyaddress exists or not?
< danger89> according to the documentation it does!
< gwillen> are you sure you spelled it right? if you run "bitcoin-cli help" is getreceviedbyaddress listed?
< gwillen> ...see, I can't even spell it
< sipa> danger89: did you compile without wallet support?
< danger89> sipa: ah could that be it? I indeed set disablewallet=1
< danger89> I didn't know it was a wallet related API call
< danger89> sipa: No I didn't. I used the binary for Linux, given by github releases.
< danger89> but indeed the disablewallet was the issue ><
< danger89> sorry!
< sipa> danger89: it shows how much *your wallet* has received on a given address